What is sci.research seeking if not the truth?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The set of all SUBSETS that don't contain themself -> PARADISE
Next: Quantum Gravity 399.98: The Independence Operator, P(A-->B), and the Dependence Operator
From: NoEinstein on 7 Jul 2010 23:39 On Jul 7, 1:31 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > Androcles: I didn't know you had a sense of humor. Keep it up! NoEinstein > > "Benj" <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote in message > > news:8dea86d9-0e68-4066-beb3-6a1391409765(a)5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! > > No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be > banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns > who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can > prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you > thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook > (that they keep recommending I read). > > For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new > ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual > thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley > can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he > forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from > being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already > been taken care of by others! > > So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in > professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" > or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is > "insane" do you? > > So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go > to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm > banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a > "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers > "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they > were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal > who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And > that takes some serious science to accomplish! > > ========================================== > Huh! That's nothing, I've been thrown out of some of the worst pubs > in town. > Groucho Marx - Wikiquote > I sent the club a wire stating, "PLEASE ACCEPT MY RESIGNATION. I DON'T WANT > TO BELONG TO ANY CLUB THAT WILL ACCEPT PEOPLE LIKE ME AS A MEMBER".
From: NoEinstein on 7 Jul 2010 23:45 On Jul 7, 11:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > CORRECTION: Make that won't, instead of... 'want'! I've always been "ear minded", meaning that I mispelled words, but got the SOUND correct. NE > > On Jul 7, 1:14 pm, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: > > Dear Benj: Thanks for such a candid reply! I'm 'choosing up sides'. > You're selected for the team! The only good thing about PD and... > Sam, is that some of the readers probably enjoy seeing how unaffected > I am by either of those... teachers. (Ha, ha, HA!) I'm giving you > five stars. Talk some science. I want assume that you're a > crackpot. NoEinstein > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying onsci.research > > > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! > > > No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be > > banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns > > who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can > > prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you > > thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook > > (that they keep recommending I read). > > > For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new > > ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual > > thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley > > can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he > > forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from > > being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already > > been taken care of by others! > > > So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in > > professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" > > or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is > > "insane" do you? > > > So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go > > to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm > > banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a > > "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers > > "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they > > were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal > > who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And > > that takes some serious science to accomplish!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: PD on 8 Jul 2010 10:59 On Jul 7, 10:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jul 7, 1:14 pm, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: > > Dear Benj: Thanks for such a candid reply! I'm 'choosing up sides'. > You're selected for the team! The only good thing about PD and... > Sam, is that some of the readers probably enjoy seeing how unaffected > I am by either of those... teachers. (Ha, ha, HA!) I'm giving you > five stars. Talk some science. I want assume that you're a > crackpot. NoEinstein I'm glad you're so thrilled at being unaffected by teaching. This puts you in the same category as pumpkins, pillows, and pigs, which are also completely unaffected by teaching. > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! > > > No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be > > banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns > > who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can > > prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you > > thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook > > (that they keep recommending I read). > > > For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new > > ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual > > thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley > > can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he > > forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from > > being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already > > been taken care of by others! > > > So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in > > professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" > > or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is > > "insane" do you? > > > So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go > > to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm > > banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a > > "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers > > "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they > > were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal > > who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And > > that takes some serious science to accomplish!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: PD on 8 Jul 2010 11:04 On Jul 7, 10:29 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jul 7, 12:29 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > In your DREAMS, PD! The only person who's inadequate, here, is you, > the couch potato ex teacher. NE > I always find it remarkable how many people come to this newsgroup with the loudly pronounced battle cry: "I dare you to try to teach me this so-called physics! I'll bet you will not succeed! You see? I'm not convinced of your so-called truths. You have failed to change my mind, and therefore I have *won* because I have resisted all attempts to teach me." Anyone who would find themselves victorious in willful ignorance is a little mentally maladjusted. PD
From: Uncle Ben on 8 Jul 2010 16:14
On Jul 8, 10:59 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 7, 10:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Jul 7, 1:14 pm, Benj <bjac...(a)iwaynet.net> wrote: > > > Dear Benj: Thanks for such a candid reply! I'm 'choosing up sides'. > > You're selected for the team! The only good thing about PD and... > > Sam, is that some of the readers probably enjoy seeing how unaffected > > I am by either of those... teachers. (Ha, ha, HA!) I'm giving you > > five stars. Talk some science. I want assume that you're a > > crackpot. NoEinstein > > I'm glad you're so thrilled at being unaffected by teaching. > This puts you in the same category as pumpkins, pillows, and pigs, > which are also completely unaffected by teaching. > > > > > > > > On Jul 2, 12:42 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 7/2/10 10:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > Dear Readers: For a while now, I have been replying on sci.research > > > > > because the subjects were of interest. Suddenly from out of nowhere, > > > > > a "moderator" notifies me that I've got the physics wrong. > > > > > This is no big surprise, as you get the physics wrong here too! > > > > No question that "Sam" and his popular science magazines won't be > > > banned from sci.physics.research. It's "moderated" by the same clowns > > > who run Physics Forums. In religion it doesn't matter what you can > > > prove, the only thing that matters can be found in the bible you > > > thump. With these guys, that bible is a freshman physics textbook > > > (that they keep recommending I read). > > > > For these incompetents and so-called "teachers" like "wormley" new > > > ideas are simply frightening as is any action that hints at actual > > > thinking. Luckily, I can insult the pants off these idiots and Wormley > > > can't ruin my life by flunking me the way he can all the students he > > > forces to worship him, nor can "Hendrik" keep any of my papers from > > > being published or get me fired from my job. Heh, THAT has already > > > been taken care of by others! > > > > So all they can do is sit there asserting that being "high up" in > > > professional organizations makes you "right" and that I am "nothing" > > > or worse, "insane". Hey, you don't need to listen to anyone who is > > > "insane" do you? > > > > So NoEinstein, You are making good progress, but you have a ways to go > > > to get up here in the rarefied air of kook-dom where I am. Hey, I'm > > > banned for life by those Physics Forums idiots for being a > > > "crackpot". Yawn. And they are still amateurs. Hey, I've had papers > > > "banned" from being published by the likes of Bell Labs back when they > > > were the envy of science. (And we even knew the editor of the journal > > > who said they applied so much pressure he couldn't resist it!) And > > > that takes some serious science to accomplish!- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Pimpkins and pillows -- OK. But pigs learn quickly. Uncle Ben |