From: Transition Zone on
On Apr 16, 7:18 am, troll <trolid...(a)go.com> wrote:
>
> Gradually, I have started getting the idea that goodness
> has no real meaning at all.

And if you have enough money on your mind, that can only be the
beginning.
From: Transition Zone on
On Apr 16, 8:41 am, Ludovicus <luir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 7:18 am, troll <trolid...(a)go.com> wrote:
>
> >What is truth?
>
> If Christ was unable to answer when
> Pilate questioned him, how you dare
> to inquire that?

Its all in asking and answering.
From: Bradley K. Sherman on

Set your wristwatch to a random time. Ask the person
next to you to tell you what time your watch displays.
If the time that person says matches the time you
read it as saying, you've experienced objective reality
to the maximum extent possible.

--bks

From: rods on
On 7 maio, 12:04, b...(a)panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
> Set your wristwatch to a random time.  Ask the person
> next to you to tell you what time your watch displays.
> If the time that person says matches the time you
> read it as saying, you've experienced objective reality
> to the maximum extent possible.
>
>     --bks

Giving this kind of "objective reality" how do you see the uncertainty
principle.
I seems that there is a clear limit on this "maximum extent possible",
and what is above (or bellow) this limit? Isn't this reality?
Rodrigo
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on
On 07/05/2010 16:10, rods wrote:
> On 7 maio, 12:04, b...(a)panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote:
>> Set your wristwatch to a random time. Ask the person
>> next to you to tell you what time your watch displays.
>> If the time that person says matches the time you
>> read it as saying, you've experienced objective reality
>> to the maximum extent possible.
>>
>> --bks
>
> Giving this kind of "objective reality" how do you see the uncertainty
> principle.
> I seems that there is a clear limit on this "maximum extent possible",
> and what is above (or bellow) this limit? Isn't this reality?
> Rodrigo

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627596.500-quantum-wonders-spooky-action-at-a-distance.html


"He calculated a mathematical inequality that encapsulated the maximum
correlation between the states of remote particles in experiments in
which three "reasonable" conditions hold: that experimenters have free
will in setting things up as they want; that the particle properties
being measured are real and pre-existing, not just popping up at the
time of measurement; and that no influence travels faster than the speed
of light, the cosmic speed limit."

If you opt for the latter being false then you also get effects
preceding causes.

--
Dirk

http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show