Prev: 4th ed. book, preface #1; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory
Next: The origin of sexually transmitted diseases
From: Transition Zone on 7 May 2010 10:58 On Apr 16, 7:18 am, troll <trolid...(a)go.com> wrote: > > Gradually, I have started getting the idea that goodness > has no real meaning at all. And if you have enough money on your mind, that can only be the beginning.
From: Transition Zone on 7 May 2010 10:59 On Apr 16, 8:41 am, Ludovicus <luir...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 7:18 am, troll <trolid...(a)go.com> wrote: > > >What is truth? > > If Christ was unable to answer when > Pilate questioned him, how you dare > to inquire that? Its all in asking and answering.
From: Bradley K. Sherman on 7 May 2010 11:04 Set your wristwatch to a random time. Ask the person next to you to tell you what time your watch displays. If the time that person says matches the time you read it as saying, you've experienced objective reality to the maximum extent possible. --bks
From: rods on 7 May 2010 11:10 On 7 maio, 12:04, b...(a)panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote: > Set your wristwatch to a random time. Ask the person > next to you to tell you what time your watch displays. > If the time that person says matches the time you > read it as saying, you've experienced objective reality > to the maximum extent possible. > > --bks Giving this kind of "objective reality" how do you see the uncertainty principle. I seems that there is a clear limit on this "maximum extent possible", and what is above (or bellow) this limit? Isn't this reality? Rodrigo
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 7 May 2010 11:15
On 07/05/2010 16:10, rods wrote: > On 7 maio, 12:04, b...(a)panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman) wrote: >> Set your wristwatch to a random time. Ask the person >> next to you to tell you what time your watch displays. >> If the time that person says matches the time you >> read it as saying, you've experienced objective reality >> to the maximum extent possible. >> >> --bks > > Giving this kind of "objective reality" how do you see the uncertainty > principle. > I seems that there is a clear limit on this "maximum extent possible", > and what is above (or bellow) this limit? Isn't this reality? > Rodrigo http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627596.500-quantum-wonders-spooky-action-at-a-distance.html "He calculated a mathematical inequality that encapsulated the maximum correlation between the states of remote particles in experiments in which three "reasonable" conditions hold: that experimenters have free will in setting things up as they want; that the particle properties being measured are real and pre-existing, not just popping up at the time of measurement; and that no influence travels faster than the speed of light, the cosmic speed limit." If you opt for the latter being false then you also get effects preceding causes. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show |