Prev: 4th ed. book, preface #1; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory
Next: The origin of sexually transmitted diseases
From: Frederick Williams on 27 Jun 2010 07:57 Frederick Williams wrote: > > Aatu Koskensilta wrote: > > > > Frederick Williams <frederick.williams2(a)tesco.net> writes: > > > > > The problem is: how does one classify truths as being empirical or > > > logical? It is a matter of arbitrary convention. > > > > More nonsense. > > Not at all. One's choice of logical constants will affect what logical > truth is, and one's choice of logical constants is a matter of arbitrary > convention. Ho, ho, ho, look what I've just discovered. Already in 1837 Bolzano (Wissenschaftslehre \S 148) made just the observation that I am making. So _you_, my little Viola wittrockiana blossom, are way out of date. Of course I could have appealed to Tarski, no less, in my original post; but though I know that his view of logical constants and thus logical truth had at one time been the Bolzanoan one, I do not know that he always held such a view and it may be that the last view he held was not the one I sketched. (Nor do I mean to imply that he got his view from Bolzano's Wissenschaftslehre.) Well, that has cheered me up enormously! -- I can't go on, I'll go on. |