From: Uncle Al on
Salmon Egg wrote:
>
> In article <4B11844D.7BFFB013(a)hate.spam.net>,
> Uncle Al <UncleAl0(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:
>
> > idiot
>
> C'mon Uncle Al. I used to think of you as Cyrano de Bererac with sharper
> rapiers than a mere "idiot."

Don't use a thermonuke when a whooppee cushion will suffice. Recycle!

Uncle Al, which is to say "CURRENT RESIDENT," received a vital missive
from the Irvine Unified School District. Massive renovation of
woefully obsolete middle school facilities would be borne upon a
deluge of taxpayer wallets. Perhaps a City Councilcritter wanted a
new Cadillac SUV Cumshaw with extra bloat. Adjacent residents' brief
inconvenience - forty years of construction traffic, smoke by day,
fire by night, and window-cracking recorded salsa on weekends
commencing at 0600 hrs - was granted a special variance by the City of
Irvine. The letter said it was all OK. A thousand or three peripheral
residents could complain by letter if it were not OK.

Dear Sir:

I received IUSD's 24 November "CURRENT RESIDENT" letter bearing $0.44
postage, an envelope, two sheets of paper, and a staple plus labor
costs and amortized overhead (cc: 33 congenitally inconsequential
poobahs and the "Irvine World News" requiring that second page). IUSD
burned my tax money. Send postcards.

IUSD is a politicized excrescence. IUSD hemorrhages bureaucratic
process and bloated cynosure employment while disgorging product
scarcely fit to flip burgers. IUSD prattles equal opportunity and
diversity, sparing no taxpayer expense to coddle genetic, somatic, and
behavioral garbage. The Severely and Profoundly Gifted are crushed,
disseminated amidst bovine confreres, and dissipated.

Rather than foster brilliance, IUSD allocates for its suppression.
IUSD is a confluence of overwhelming ignorance with overweening
arrogance. I am intolerant of those who proudly perpetuate rigorous
characterization of the topology and function of cluelessness.

"...creating the best possible learning environment for our
students..." My expectations for fresh tiger striping, Braille water
fountains, and Web-interfaced hydraulic wheelchair lifts with
quarterly statistical other-ablement compliance reportage are very
high.

IUSD process fluid is chiefly Caucasian, Asian, and East Indian. Do
something useful with it other than warehousing potential organ
donors.

Cordially,



1) East Indians are obviously porcine not bovine. Cultural
sensitivity matters!
2) USPS adhesive undergoes cryogenic failure, Tg and all that. It
was worth sending via the uncancelled stamp from another letter.
3) idiots

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: Mark Thorson on
Uncle Al wrote:
>
> IUSD process fluid is chiefly Caucasian, Asian, and East Indian. Do
> something useful with it other than warehousing potential organ
> donors.

You're losing your edge in your old age.
Time was when you'd give them a devastating reply.

> 2) USPS adhesive undergoes cryogenic failure, Tg and all that. It
> was worth sending via the uncancelled stamp from another letter.

Did you examine it under UV? For reasons that escape me,
stamps are often marked with a UV-fluorescent ink.
I suppose to catch people who re-use seemingly
uncancelled stamps.

Now that they've got you on the hook for 15 years
in federal prison, maybe you'll be more pliable.
From: Salmon Egg on
In a snippet from <4B11BBCC.CF043615(a)hate.spam.net>,
Uncle Al <UncleAl0(a)hate.spam.net> wrote:

> IUSD is a politicized excrescence. IUSD hemorrhages bureaucratic
> process and bloated cynosure employment while disgorging product
> scarcely fit to flip burgers. IUSD prattles equal opportunity and
> diversity, sparing no taxpayer expense to coddle genetic, somatic, and
> behavioral garbage. The Severely and Profoundly Gifted are crushed,
> disseminated amidst bovine confreres, and dissipated.

We have our Uncle Al back! I sure miss the old Al Bundy.

Bill

--
An old man would be better off never having been born.
From: Igor on
On Nov 28, 11:50 am, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Igor
>
> In your attempts to sound intelligent you sound so dumb?  I don’t
> know, maybe that’s not the right word.
>
> So what, if this was an “ad hoc”, model for the hydrogen atom, which
> was superseded by
> “Schroedinger's wave mechanics and Heisenberg's matrix mechanics”,
> which
> essentially form the basis for modern quantum theory.
>
> Still the Bohr model  provided the foundation, and some lasting
> aspects, as is evident by “h/2pi”, which includes “pi, a circle
> constant”.
>
> The Schroedinger's wave mechanics and Heisenberg's matrix mechanics,
> are somewhat “ad hoc” too, as they have not solved the “quantum
> gravity, ruining coupling constants, or the renormalization problem,
> while the model of the wavelength of electron, being equal to
> circumference of circle, with angular momentum of a multiple integer
> of “h/2pi”, coupled with my geometrical interpretation of “E=mc^2”
> does.
>
> My theory, which uses Bohr's model as collaboration, brings “sqrt-1”,
> out of imaginary real, into the real realm of natural unite, and
> reveals “h/2pi/2”, as limit on uncertainty, to actually be the limit
> on the “certainty of the existence of the particle”, bringing
> certainty to the uncertainty principle.
>
>  And its in part because, you and your colleagues could not see the
> geometrical reality of Einstein’s, “E=mc^2”, or Bohr’s “wavelength =
> circle = multiple integer of h/2pi”
>
> As to
>
> > So yes, accelerate a photon, like letting it fall into a strong enough
> > gravity well, and it should gain enough energy to attain rest mass,
> > and yes -1 charge.
>
> And all this time, people have been seriously searching for where
> mass
> comes from.  So it's not the Higgs.  It's a photon falling through a
> gravity well.  That's just too stupid for words.  Learn some simple
> basic physics. You might want to start with conservations laws.
>
> Isn’t that something,  all this time, people have been seriously
> searching for where mass
> comes from and no, it is not the Higg’s it is Rest mass comes from the
> kinetic energy of energy in circular and or spherical motion just as
> described in my theory.
> And as for
>
> > We already know that photons gain energy and higher frequency as they
> > inter a gravity field. I am suggesting that, if this gravity field is
> > strong enough, it will produce electrons from those photons.
>
> That's called the gravitational Doppler effect.  And unlike your
> ridiculous idea, it doesn't violate conservation laws.
>
> If their “gravitational Doppler effect”, doesn’t violate conservation
> laws, than my idea of photons gaining enough energy to attain rest
> mass, by entering strong enough gravity field, doesn’t either, because
> they are essentially saying the same thing.
>
> P.S. But if it does violate "the laws of conservation", as presently
> written, than they are written wrong, because the theory is correct.
>
> Conrad J Countess

Your response is an incoherent mess. Good luck in your ignorance.

From: cjcountess on



Planck discovered E=hf, for photons
Einstein discovered E=mc^2, for electrons / matter
deBroglie discovered E=hf=mc^2, at level of electron, which has -1
charge and that electron is also a wave. This indicates a smooth
transition from energy to matter, along the same EM spectrum, which
can also be considered the energy/matter spectrum, as well as the
electromagnetic spectrum.
Bohr discovered that wavelength of electron is equal to circumference
of circle, with an angular momentum of a multiple integer of h/2pi.
Therefore it follows from this and geometrical evidence that I
presented that, (E=mc^2) = (E=mc^circled) and c = (sqrt -1)
c^2 or c in linear direction x c in 90 degree angular direction
creates a 90 degree arc trajectory, which if constant creates a circle
of energy, with an angular momentum = (h/2pi, and wavelength being
inversely proportional, = (hx2pi).

Furthermore, if the amplitude is constant along the EM spectrum, for
single waves, than the wave would make 2 rotations (spin1/2), at 90
degree angle to each other, in order to complete 1 wave cycle,
creating a standing spherical wave of angular momentum( h/2pi/2) whose
spherical diameter = radius of circle = c = h = sqrt-1 = reduced
Compton wavelength = Swartzchild radius.
Sense wave cease to propagate at wavelength equal to or smaller than
inter granular space of material of medium, this also agrees with
Einstein and Minkowskie’s (c x sqrt-1) and /or (ct x sqrt-1), as
measurement of quantum of space-time.

Again I say, the way all this evidence fits together so seamlessly, to
give emergence to such a clear geometrical picture, cannot be
coincidence. It would be statistically very improbable, or perhaps
even impossible for this theory not to be correct

I am tempted to rest my case as I do know that my evidence is
sufficient.

I do not particularly enjoy beating up on bitter old washed up
fighters like Al. I am not that young myself but at least I discovered
something. Al is bitter and angry because I beat him

“Al” you say calculate Newtons G to six SIGNIFIGANT figures. That is
really easy, why don’t you try, and if you cannot, I will show you.

Remember now, it should be as simple and efficient as possible,
without leaving anything significant out. This is because, just as
with computers and the human mind, efficiency saves storage space,
memory space, and speeds up processing time, so don’t just try to show
off your mathematical agility or you may make yourself continue to
look stupid.

And on top of that, you seem to have a few stupid followers you you
may lead down the wrong path. That is, unless that poster   Mark
Thorson, was joking. A better class of adversaries!! You got to be
joking!! This clown may have you fooled, but I know and he knows, hes
about as dumb as they come.

Conrad J Countess