Why was the Haiti Earthquake was not predictable?
in [Relativity]
|
From: Y.Porat on 14 Jan 2010 03:15 On Jan 13, 6:32 pm, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Why was todays, Haiti Earthquake not predictable? > > It was ~ 7.0 scale. Why cant we model or simulate the complete earth > structure on a Super Computer. That may help predict such earth > quakes. > > Say, If we know that some earthquake is going to hit someplace in 1-2 > days. People can travel away from the place and take their important > thing with them. > > That way Economical Losses and Deaths can be lowered. > > Why do the scientists unable to simulate Earth Quake predictions, Just > like they do the Weather Forecasts. > > If I get enough funding I can create such sotware with 50-60% accurate > forecasts. > > Will need Funds & enough information to start the project & Research. > > This Earth Quake cost $2 Billions of loss. If I get even $100 million, > I may create a software that predicts EarthQuakes in advance. That > could save Billions of Dollars every year and 1000s of lives. > > I think United Nations/ Some BIG Org should donate me $100 million to > work on a reliable EarthQuake forecasting program. > > I will need costly Super Computer and other things to do the > research. > > I find every year EarthQuake kills 1000sof people and a 2 Billions > Dollar looses./ year. So creating a EarthQuake predicting program will > be good for mankind. > > I have the brains to create it. But looking for people who can fund > it. > > Bye > Sanny > > Computer has become Human, > > See how:http://www.GetClub.com > > Now you can chat with it. --------------------- i am sure that QM can solve it (as it could solve anything in our physical life......(:-) Y.Porat -------------------------------
From: Sanny on 14 Jan 2010 03:29 > i am sure that QM can solve it > (as it could solve anything in our physical life......(:-) May be but at the moment Quantum Mechanics is in Child Stage. It will need atleast 10-15 yrs to mature and give strong applications. Bye Sanny Work on our Projects: http://www.getclub.com/Experts.php and get paid.
From: J. Clarke on 14 Jan 2010 03:56 Sanny wrote: >> i am sure that QM can solve it >> (as it could solve anything in our physical life......(:-) > > > May be but at the moment Quantum Mechanics is in Child Stage. It will > need atleast 10-15 yrs to mature and give strong applications. Uh, QM has been around for about a hundred years now. Why does everybody think that it's something new?
From: Sanny on 14 Jan 2010 04:39 On Jan 14, 1:56 pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: > Sanny wrote: > >> i am sure that QM can solve it > >> (as it could solve anything in our physical life......(:-) > > > May be but at the moment Quantum Mechanics is in Child Stage. It will > > need atleast 10-15 yrs to mature and give strong applications. > > Uh, QM has been around for about a hundred years now. Why does everybody > think that it's something new? Sorry, we were talking about Quantum Computers that will replace todays transistors based computers. Quantum computers will be 100-1000 times faster than todays computers as per the predictions by scientists. But they are one of the most complex things to design. Bye Sanny Work on our Projects: http://www.getclub.com/Experts.php and get paid.
From: Y.Porat on 14 Jan 2010 07:09
On Jan 14, 11:39 am, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 14, 1:56 pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > > Sanny wrote: > > >> i am sure that QM can solve it > > >> (as it could solve anything in our physical life......(:-) > > > > May be but at the moment Quantum Mechanics is in Child Stage. It will > > > need atleast 10-15 yrs to mature and give strong applications. > > > Uh, QM has been around for about a hundred years now. Why does everybody > > think that it's something new? > > Sorry, we were talking about Quantum Computers that will replace > todays transistors based computers. > > Quantum computers will be 100-1000 times faster than todays computers > as per the predictions by scientists. But they are one of the most > complex things to design. > > Bye > Sanny > > Work on our Projects:http://www.getclub.com/Experts.phpand get > paid. ----------------- very nice yet remains the question who is really developing **now**those QM computers ??!!! Y.P -------------------------- |