Why was the Haiti Earthquake was not predictable?
in [Relativity]
|
From: jmfbahciv on 14 Jan 2010 08:48 Sanny wrote: > On Jan 14, 1:56 pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: >> Sanny wrote: >>>> i am sure that QM can solve it >>>> (as it could solve anything in our physical life......(:-) >>> May be but at the moment Quantum Mechanics is in Child Stage. It will >>> need atleast 10-15 yrs to mature and give strong applications. >> Uh, QM has been around for about a hundred years now. Why does everybody >> think that it's something new? > > Sorry, we were talking about Quantum Computers that will replace > todays transistors based computers. > > Quantum computers will be 100-1000 times faster than todays computers > as per the predictions by scientists. But they are one of the most > complex things to design. And they still won't be able to add. /BAH
From: BradGuth on 14 Jan 2010 09:43 On Jan 13, 11:38 pm, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > How much is your hourly undivided attention worth? > > Depends on the nature of the work, my health status and work > requirements. > > For small works, I do not take any money But for complex jobs I take > as per the complexity of the Job. > > I do not work, If the Client shows signs of not funding the project on > time. Only when the client agrees to pay me in advance I takeup the > Job. I try my best to give as much attention as possible to get good > results. > > I usually take those works which no one in the world can do. As my > prices are high and people only consult me when they cannot find > anyone else, who can do their job. > > When the task is impossible, I say it is possible. > > If you have a big Project/Job > > Submit your Project:http://www.getclub.com/Forms/add.php?add=Projects > > Incase I am not confident of doing a project I tell it in the > beginning itself. I have 80-90% success rate with the projects I do. I > know my limits, So the client is always satisfied as I do not give > false details. > > Sometimes errors happens, Then I keep updating the clients, So the > Client is satisfied 80-90% of the time. > > If you are a Expoert in your field, You can Join and work for us: > > Work on our Projects:http://www.getclub.com/Experts.phpand get paid. > > Bye > Sanny > > Computer has become Human > > See how:http://www.GetClub.com > > Now you can chat with it. To start with, you need to clean up your "getclub" pages, by getting rid of those silly graphics, advertisements and assorted spamware, because to most of us it looks exactly like something a 3rd or 4th grader might have. You're not dysfunctional or otherwise weird, are you? ~ BG
From: BradGuth on 14 Jan 2010 09:47 On Jan 14, 5:48 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > Sanny wrote: > > On Jan 14, 1:56 pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: > >> Sanny wrote: > >>>> i am sure that QM can solve it > >>>> (as it could solve anything in our physical life......(:-) > >>> May be but at the moment Quantum Mechanics is in Child Stage. It will > >>> need atleast 10-15 yrs to mature and give strong applications. > >> Uh, QM has been around for about a hundred years now. Why does everybody > >> think that it's something new? > > > Sorry, we were talking about Quantum Computers that will replace > > todays transistors based computers. > > > Quantum computers will be 100-1000 times faster than todays computers > > as per the predictions by scientists. But they are one of the most > > complex things to design. > > And they still won't be able to add. > > /BAH or multi-language cope. Sanny needs something something better, such as just about everything. ~ BG
From: dlzc on 14 Jan 2010 10:02 Hello Androcles: On Jan 13, 12:59 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_r> wrote: > "dlzc" <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote in message > news:68237eef-ff6a-47f4-a5f0-5bf0b70b7685(a)c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > On Jan 13, 11:29 am, Sanny <softtank...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Why did you think this was suitable fare for > > > an astronomy newsgroup, or one related to > > > relativity? > > > Earthquake is caused due to collision of earth > > crusts. Since Its a Planet related topic, > > astronomy can say a bit about earth quakes and > > volcanos. > > No. Astronomy is about observations of distant > stars, groupings, and EXOplanets. > > ========================================= > By royal proclamation of Smiffy: Thanks for the slap. We get really excited about detecting lunar quakes, and apparent water flows (floods) on Mars too. David A. Smith
From: BradGuth on 14 Jan 2010 10:05
On Jan 13, 3:57 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BradGuth <bradg...(a)gmail.com> writes: > >> Why do you say that? The calculations are public record. > >And yet you never mention the 2e20 N/sec or any other tidal or energy > >transfer related matters. > > I've corrected you regarding this a couple of times before. "N/sec" > (newtons per second) isn't a unit of energy or force. It would be > a rate of change in force, which can go by the unofficial unit called > "yank". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yank_(physics) > > What do you intend this 2E20 number to mean, if not "yanks"? Or is it > just something you made up, meaningless to everyone else? The moon(Selene) isn't standing still, and that 2e20 N binding force is therefore continuously on the move (like the second hand on a the clock), whereas each and every second that force is causing the crust and interior of Earth to morph, as well as causing oceans to ebb and tide (by one account 3.5 TW worth). The amount of transferred force that becomes thermal energy is what's up in the air, so to speak. However 0.1% or 55.5 TW doesn't seem to be asking too much. That lunar tidal force is obviously causing the iron core of Earth to move, and you can't do that without transferring force into energy and thereby creating heat. ~ BG |