Would you buy a P&S because Ashton Kutcher says you should?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Dpreview, not just whores, but CHEAP whores to boot! (Rich's hate)
Next: Would you buy a SLR because Rich says you should?
From: Mxsmanic on 27 May 2010 14:04 Bruce writes: > When might that be? When digital doesn't.
From: John Navas on 27 May 2010 14:11 On Thu, 27 May 2010 20:02:29 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote in <vsctv5dtt5fggvu4tkknd6qpi0rd2s35fg(a)4ax.com>: >John Navas writes: > >> The oil business is actually very complex and difficult. > >It certainly seems to have been that way for BNP. Or perhaps BNP is just too >greedy. Evidence is mounting that BP cut corners in haste to move the rig to another drill site. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John Navas on 27 May 2010 14:13 On Thu, 27 May 2010 20:03:30 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote in <8uctv5lfmodh6oki7p5q28g66hm83b2ifd(a)4ax.com>: >John McWilliams writes: > >> Did IBM crash after Tom Watson retired? > >It has never recaptured the glory deads of Watson. IBM has actually been doing quite well, and it's certainly not clear that Watson would have done any better. >> H-P after Messr's Hewlett and Packard? > >Carly Fiorina pretty much destroyed HP. HP has rebounded nicely now that she's gone, recently passing IBM as server king. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: Bruce on 27 May 2010 16:43 On Thu, 27 May 2010 20:03:59 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Bruce writes: > >> Yours being a few years ago ... > >I'm still waiting for my fifteen minutes. You never stop trying, do you. (no reply sought or required)
From: Bruce on 27 May 2010 16:43
On Thu, 27 May 2010 20:04:19 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Bruce writes: > >> When might that be? > >When digital doesn't. When might that be? |