From: John Navas on
On Thu, 27 May 2010 12:29:27 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote
in <vaisv5p7lgmqqfuodtanar2dbgu9p3j3sb(a)4ax.com>:

>John Navas writes:
>
>> Some are; others are not. There are many very successful companies
>> without a single superstar, rather a team and a culture.
>
>Examples? General Electric is often cited, but it's the exception rather than
>the rule.

I disagree, and we're getting way off topic here, so I'm just going to
give a few examples (in alphabetical order) and then drop the subthread:
Aetna, Allstate, Altria Group, American Express, AT&T, Bank of New York
Mellon, Best Buy, BMW, Caterpillar, Cisco Systems, Coca-Cola, Corning,
Costco Wholesale, Deere, DuPont, Exxon Mobil, FedEx, Genentech, General
Mills, Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Home Depot, Ingram Micro, International
Paper, Johnson & Johnson, Juniper Networks, Marriott International,
Nestle, New York Life, Nike, Nokia, PepsiCo, Procter & Gamble, Safeway,
Singapore Airlines, Schlumberger, Southwest Airlines, Staples, State
Farm Insurance, Sysco, Target, Texas Instruments, 3M, UPS, Walgreen,
Wells Fargo, Weyerhaeuser.

>And some companies, such as Exxon, are successful mainly because
>it's so easy to make money in their fields.

The oil business is actually very complex and difficult.

--
Best regards,
John

"Those who have knowledge, don't predict.
Those who predict, don't have knowledge." [Lao-Tzu]
From: John McWilliams on
Mxsmanic wrote:
> John Navas writes:
>
>> Some are; others are not. There are many very successful companies
>> without a single superstar, rather a team and a culture.
>
> Examples? General Electric is often cited, but it's the exception rather than
> the rule. And some companies, such as Exxon, are successful mainly because
> it's so easy to make money in their fields.

Easy? Oh, yeah, that's so easy.

John is right: There are more companies that don't rely on a single man
or woman than do. Don't forget, both MS and APPL are very young
companies. Did IBM crash after Tom Watson retired? H-P after Messr's
Hewlett and Packard? Std. Oil after the Rockefellers? Northern RR after
JJ Hill? And on and on.

Sure, some small companies fell by the wayside after their founders died
or left. Graveyards full.

--
john mcwilliams
From: Mxsmanic on
John Navas writes:

> The oil business is actually very complex and difficult.

It certainly seems to have been that way for BNP. Or perhaps BNP is just too
greedy.
From: Mxsmanic on
John McWilliams writes:

> Did IBM crash after Tom Watson retired?

It has never recaptured the glory deads of Watson.

> H-P after Messr's Hewlett and Packard?

Carly Fiorina pretty much destroyed HP.
From: Mxsmanic on
Bruce writes:

> Yours being a few years ago ...

I'm still waiting for my fifteen minutes.