Would you buy a P&S because Ashton Kutcher says you should?
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Dpreview, not just whores, but CHEAP whores to boot! (Rich's hate)
Next: Would you buy a SLR because Rich says you should?
From: John Navas on 26 May 2010 22:29 On Wed, 26 May 2010 17:18:41 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote in <4bfdba66$0$1652$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>: >On 26/05/10 5:05 PM, George Kerby wrote: > ><snip> > >> You have my explicit permission to reveal yourself as the true buffoon that >> you are: Carry on, fool! > >With all due respect George, you're the one responding to, rather than >kill-filing, both of our favorite trolls. Those would of course be you and George. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John Navas on 26 May 2010 22:31 On Wed, 26 May 2010 16:15:06 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote in <4bfdab7f$0$1632$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>: >Market cap is pretty meaningless without the P/E ratio. ... P/E ratio and all other relevant factors are subsumed in market cap. That's how the market works. To claim otherwise is, well, ignorant. You clearly know as much about finance as you do about cellular. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John Navas on 26 May 2010 22:33 On Thu, 27 May 2010 01:41:05 +0200, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote in <f9crv55qrj0f4bckhvjqfug8n0bc8uamqr(a)4ax.com>: >John Navas writes: > >> Many people, but not all people. For example, there were quite a few of >> us saying the AOL-Time Warner deal was stupid from the very beginning. >> Google is in a different class entirely, as is Steve Jobs (not Apple), >> not perfect, but very very good, and able to learn from mistakes. > >The most successful companies are always built around people, and often around >a single person. ... Some are; others are not. There are many very successful companies without a single superstar, rather a team and a culture. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: David J Taylor on 27 May 2010 02:23 "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:f9crv55qrj0f4bckhvjqfug8n0bc8uamqr(a)4ax.com... [] > The most successful companies are always built around people, and often > around > a single person. When that single person leaves, the companies often > collapse, > or at least they settle into a kind of long-term mediocrity until the > replacement management finally screws up enough to bury them. Mr Canon? Mr Nikon? But perhaps true about Mr Sony. David
From: Mxsmanic on 27 May 2010 06:29
John Navas writes: > Some are; others are not. There are many very successful companies > without a single superstar, rather a team and a culture. Examples? General Electric is often cited, but it's the exception rather than the rule. And some companies, such as Exxon, are successful mainly because it's so easy to make money in their fields. |