Prev: How to produce this kind of animation?
Next: Trusteer Rapport - any bugs?
From: Jim on 26 Mar 2010 04:39
On 2010-03-26, Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote:
> Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> omprem <omprem(a)magma.ca> wrote:
>> > I know this is a very elementary question to most of you but how does
>> > one download and make DVD copies of movies on a Mac? What software is
>> > required, such as Toast? And what is a good web site for acquiring
>> > movies?
>>
>> Are you asking us to assist you in copyright violation? Or are we talking
>> about freely distributable content?
>
> My god you're a self-righteous pompous prick at times, aren't you Jim?

Sorry, I can't quite tell - is this one of those occasions where you want me
to reply to you?

Or did you just want to take your usual unjustified moral highground whilst
hurling your usual insults?

Jim
--
Twitter:@GreyAreaUK
"[The MP4-12C] will be fitted with all manner of pointlessly shiny
buttons that light up and a switch that says 'sport mode' that isn't
connected to anything." The Daily Mash.
From: Woody on 26 Mar 2010 05:14
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2010-03-26, Rowland McDonnell
> <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > Jim
> <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: >
> >> omprem <omprem(a)magma.ca> wrote:
> >> > I know this is a very elementary question to most of you but how does
> >> > one download and make DVD copies of movies on a Mac? What software is
> >> > required, such as Toast? And what is a good web site for acquiring
> >> > movies?
> >>
> >> Are you asking us to assist you in copyright violation? Or are we talking
> >> about freely distributable content?
> >
> > My god you're a self-righteous pompous prick at times, aren't you Jim?
>
> Sorry, I can't quite tell - is this one of those occasions where you want me
> to reply to you?
>
> Or did you just want to take your usual unjustified moral highground whilst
> hurling your usual insults?

I am thinking the latter.

--
Woody

www.alienrat.com
From: D.M. Procida on 26 Mar 2010 05:42
Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:

> Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
> > On 2010-03-26, Rowland McDonnell
> > <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > Jim
> > <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: >

> > >> Are you asking us to assist you in copyright violation? Or are we talking
> > >> about freely distributable content?
> > >
> > > My god you're a self-righteous pompous prick at times, aren't you Jim?
> >
> > Sorry, I can't quite tell - is this one of those occasions where you want me
> > to reply to you?
> >
> > Or did you just want to take your usual unjustified moral highground whilst
> > hurling your usual insults?
>
> I am thinking the latter.

If you don't enjoy reading Rowland's angry accusations - and I expect
you don't; I certainly don't - may I respectfully suggest not responding
to them, as doing so only and inevitably provokes more of them.

As for the substance of accusations like that - they need not be
rebutted, because the opinion of anyone who'd make a judgement based on
them is not one worth considering.

Daniele
From: Paul Womar on 26 Mar 2010 16:02
D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote:

> If you don't enjoy reading Rowland's angry accusations - and I expect
> you don't; I certainly don't - may I respectfully suggest not responding
> to them, as doing so only and inevitably provokes more of them.

I suppose a flurry of "Why are all you ignorant fucks persecuting me by
ignoring me" posts would make something of a refreshing change.
--
-> The email address used in this message *IS* valid <-
From: Rowland McDonnell on 27 Mar 2010 06:39
Paul Womar <{$PW$}@womar.co.uk> wrote:

> D.M. Procida <real-not-anti-spam-address(a)apple-juice.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > If you don't enjoy reading Rowland's angry accusations - and I expect
> > you don't; I certainly don't - may I respectfully suggest not responding
> > to them, as doing so only and inevitably provokes more of them.
>
> I suppose a flurry of "Why are all you ignorant fucks persecuting me by
> ignoring me" posts would make something of a refreshing change.

You shits just can't lay off, can you?

Just got to jump in with some personal abuse directed at me, haven't
you?

And of course you all reject on spec my allegations against you - great,
isn't it?

while thinking that it's perfectly okay for you to abuse me - why is
this?

All I have to do is show some evidence of people being nasty and
hypocritical, and I get attacked as a nutter.

I do think your behaviour - all of you, pretty much - is deeply shitty.

What I mean is the barrage of personal abuse that I get, and the further
personal abuse I get when I point out that I've been abused.

Will no-one attempt to understand the world as I see it?

Nope, all you want to do is - well, I don't know, provoke further
nastiness?

I'm particularly surprised at Daniele's recent remarks - he's capable of
thinking clearly, and I'm surprised at his recent error.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: How to produce this kind of animation?
Next: Trusteer Rapport - any bugs?