From: SpaceMarine on 17 Mar 2010 12:41 so a common request by the non-diehard mac user is, "How do I enable password authentication on Mail?" to which the dedicated chime in, "Simple: Log off and don't let anybody ever touch your Mac without direct adult supervision!" while that may be a fine technical solution, sadly it is not a practical one. as we enter the era of appliance computing and coffee-table devices, i am curious: how do you think Apple will solution security? email holds private personal information. i believe multiple users logging off/on is not supported on a device like the iPad. but clearly there is Mail on the iPad. unlike the iPhone, clearly also this device is meant to be left unsupervised in the household, where guests may be flipping thru photos or whatnot. so then, how will Mail be updated to support this security risk scenario? will they finally enable mailbox authentication? or stick to the naive notion that the account-owner will be always be overseeing his toys? whatcha think.
From: Davoud on 17 Mar 2010 12:57 SpaceMarine wrote: > how do you think Apple will solution security? Now that's funny. Definitely dumb enough to get you a job at CNN, which is "efforting" to get additional details. Davoud -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
From: SpaceMarine on 17 Mar 2010 13:19 On Mar 17, 11:57 am, Davoud <s...(a)sky.net> wrote: > SpaceMarine wrote: > > how do you think Apple will solution security? > > Now that's funny. Definitely dumb enough to get you a job at CNN, which > is "efforting" to get additional details. why be a prick about it, troll? oh yeah, cuz youre one of those dolts who can only scream "Log off!" yeah. thanks for playing. btw i never said "efforting", nor would i, but i work in a fortune 100 tech firm and we use "solution" in that manner all the time. sorry if you hate yourself. sm
From: Davoud on 17 Mar 2010 14:20 SpaceMarine: > > > how do you think Apple will solution security? Davoud: > > Now that's funny. Definitely dumb enough to get you a job at CNN, which > > is "efforting" to get additional details. Space Marine: > btw i never said "efforting", nor would i, but i work in a fortune 100 > tech firm and we use "solution" in that manner all the time. Try using "solve." People will be slower to pick up on your illiteracy. Davoud -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
From: Warren Oates on 17 Mar 2010 15:06
In article <170320101420140146%star(a)sky.net>, Davoud <star(a)sky.net> wrote: > Space Marine: > > btw i never said "efforting", nor would i, but i work in a fortune 100 > > tech firm and we use "solution" in that manner all the time. > > Try using "solve." People will be slower to pick up on your illiteracy. I like "gifted" as in "he gifted me with a small amount of extremely powerful weed." These things are invented by the lower middle classes to make themselves feel better educated. Going forward, 365/24/7, we need to actualize some broad-based methods of empowerment. Or mothers of invention, I guess. -- Very old woody beets will never cook tender. -- Fannie Farmer |