From: SpaceMarine on
so a common request by the non-diehard mac user is, "How do I enable
password authentication on Mail?" to which the dedicated chime in,
"Simple: Log off and don't let anybody ever touch your Mac without
direct adult supervision!"

while that may be a fine technical solution, sadly it is not a
practical one.

as we enter the era of appliance computing and coffee-table devices, i
am curious: how do you think Apple will solution security? email holds
private personal information. i believe multiple users logging off/on
is not supported on a device like the iPad. but clearly there is Mail
on the iPad. unlike the iPhone, clearly also this device is meant to
be left unsupervised in the household, where guests may be flipping
thru photos or whatnot. so then, how will Mail be updated to support
this security risk scenario?

will they finally enable mailbox authentication? or stick to the naive
notion that the account-owner will be always be overseeing his toys?

whatcha think.
From: Davoud on
SpaceMarine wrote:

> how do you think Apple will solution security?

Now that's funny. Definitely dumb enough to get you a job at CNN, which
is "efforting" to get additional details.

Davoud

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
From: SpaceMarine on
On Mar 17, 11:57 am, Davoud <s...(a)sky.net> wrote:
> SpaceMarine wrote:
> > how do you think Apple will solution security?
>
> Now that's funny. Definitely dumb enough to get you a job at CNN, which
> is "efforting" to get additional details.

why be a prick about it, troll? oh yeah, cuz youre one of those dolts
who can only scream "Log off!" yeah. thanks for playing.

btw i never said "efforting", nor would i, but i work in a fortune 100
tech firm and we use "solution" in that manner all the time.

sorry if you hate yourself.


sm
From: Davoud on
SpaceMarine:
> > > how do you think Apple will solution security?

Davoud:
> > Now that's funny. Definitely dumb enough to get you a job at CNN, which
> > is "efforting" to get additional details.

Space Marine:
> btw i never said "efforting", nor would i, but i work in a fortune 100
> tech firm and we use "solution" in that manner all the time.

Try using "solve." People will be slower to pick up on your illiteracy.

Davoud

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm
From: Warren Oates on
In article <170320101420140146%star(a)sky.net>, Davoud <star(a)sky.net>
wrote:

> Space Marine:
> > btw i never said "efforting", nor would i, but i work in a fortune 100
> > tech firm and we use "solution" in that manner all the time.
>
> Try using "solve." People will be slower to pick up on your illiteracy.

I like "gifted" as in "he gifted me with a small amount of extremely
powerful weed." These things are invented by the lower middle classes to
make themselves feel better educated. Going forward, 365/24/7, we need
to actualize some broad-based methods of empowerment.

Or mothers of invention, I guess.
--
Very old woody beets will never cook tender.
-- Fannie Farmer