iPad advertising "misleading"
in [Mac Systems]
|
From: nospam on 1 Apr 2010 10:11 In article <hp1q1m$8gr$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter K�hlmann <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: > >> >> > your son bought a mac, he too must be a cretin and a cult member. > >> >> > >> >> I bought it. And no, he does not belong to your idiotic cargo cult > >> > > >> > you're even more of a hypocrite. > >> > >> What for? > > > > because on one hand you slam apple and on the other hand, you bought > > one. > > I don't slap apple. I slap apple for nonsense hardware and ridiculous > prices yet you paid that so called ridiculous price for nonsense hardware. that makes you a hypocrite.
From: owl on 1 Apr 2010 10:30 In comp.os.linux.advocacy Fa-groon <fa-groon(a)mad.com> wrote: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:07:02 -0700, Peter Köhlmann wrote > (in article <hov6s6$cii$03$1(a)news.t-online.com>): > >> Fa-groon wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:19:06 -0700, Wes Groleau wrote >>> (in article <houm0a$qdf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>): >>> >>>> Mocassin joe wrote: >>>>> "Keynote on iPad is the most powerful presentation application ever >>>>> made . for a mobile device." (Ellipses added.) Without those last four >>>>> words, you would think Apple had never heard of Microsoft (MSFT) >>>>> PowerPoint. >>>> >>>> I don't know anything about Keynote, but there's GOT TO be something >>>> better than powerpoint out there! >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Yes there is and it IS Keynote. It's MUCH better than Powerpoint. >> >> Because a cargo cult member says so? >> The translation of your tripe reads as "Keynote is shitty beyond belief, >> but as it comes with OSX it is apple shite. Delicious" >> >> > > Look jerk, I've used everything: Powerpoint, Keynote, OO, even Aldus > Persuasion. Keynote is BY FAR the best. It just happens to be a Mac program, > but it would be superior to Powerpoint (and every other alternative) even if > it were a piece of perpetually unfinished Linux freeware! Are you taking the position that some unfinished Linux freeware might be better than anything else in its class?
From: Peter Köhlmann on 1 Apr 2010 10:36 nospam wrote: > In article <hp1q1m$8gr$02$1(a)news.t-online.com>, Peter Köhlmann > <peter-koehlmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: > >> >> >> > your son bought a mac, he too must be a cretin and a cult >> >> >> > member. >> >> >> >> >> >> I bought it. And no, he does not belong to your idiotic cargo >> >> >> cult >> >> > >> >> > you're even more of a hypocrite. >> >> >> >> What for? >> > >> > because on one hand you slam apple and on the other hand, you bought >> > one. >> >> I don't slap apple. I slap apple for nonsense hardware and ridiculous >> prices > > yet you paid that so called ridiculous price for nonsense hardware. > that makes you a hypocrite. You are so incredibly stupid (after all, you are a worshipping cargo cult member) that you can't even understand very simply contexts -- Just out of curiosity does this actually mean something or have some of the few remaining bits of your brain just evaporated?
From: -hh on 1 Apr 2010 13:39 nospam <nos...(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: > Peter K hlmann <peter-koehlm...(a)t-online.de> wrote: > > > > No. This is posted in COLA > > Look up up the newsgroups list. COLA is the first one > > the list of newsgroups is order independent. Its mostly hard to prove intent of which newsgroup was 'first', unless there's clearly groups that were added to an already existing thread. Plus, wouldn't suprise me at all if servers shuffle the newsgroup list to put it in alphabetical order. As a simple test of the latter, the newsgroup distribution for this post is now listed in reverse-alphabetical order. -hh
From: Fa-groon on 1 Apr 2010 14:14
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:30:36 -0700, owl wrote (in article <sxbv7SR.g0(a)rooftop.invalid>): > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Fa-groon <fa-groon(a)mad.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:07:02 -0700, Peter Köhlmann wrote >> (in article <hov6s6$cii$03$1(a)news.t-online.com>): >> >>> Fa-groon wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:19:06 -0700, Wes Groleau wrote >>>> (in article <houm0a$qdf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>): >>>> >>>>> Mocassin joe wrote: >>>>>> "Keynote on iPad is the most powerful presentation application ever >>>>>> made . for a mobile device." (Ellipses added.) Without those last four >>>>>> words, you would think Apple had never heard of Microsoft (MSFT) >>>>>> PowerPoint. >>>>> >>>>> I don't know anything about Keynote, but there's GOT TO be something >>>>> better than powerpoint out there! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes there is and it IS Keynote. It's MUCH better than Powerpoint. >>> >>> Because a cargo cult member says so? >>> The translation of your tripe reads as "Keynote is shitty beyond belief, >>> but as it comes with OSX it is apple shite. Delicious" >>> >>> >> >> Look jerk, I've used everything: Powerpoint, Keynote, OO, even Aldus >> Persuasion. Keynote is BY FAR the best. It just happens to be a Mac >> program, >> but it would be superior to Powerpoint (and every other alternative) even >> if >> it were a piece of perpetually unfinished Linux freeware! > > > Are you taking the position that some unfinished Linux freeware might > be better than anything else in its class? > My point is that it is irrelevant that the best presentation software is made by Apple and Keynote would the best out there EVEN if it were a piece of unfinished Linux freeware. |