iPad - no HDMI out???!!!
in [Mac Systems]
|
Prev: iPads - SOLD OUT!!!!
Next: I miss Classic
From: Moshe on 5 Apr 2010 18:40 On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:38:14 -0700 (PDT), Rex Ballard wrote: > On Mar 31, 11:39�am, James Hopone <nospanjames.hop...(a)yahoo.com> > wrote: >> On 2010-03-31 08:43:58 -0500, "Mocassin joe" <joemocasa...(a)aol.com> said: > >>> The more you look, the more useless it becomes. > >> So you can't afford one why tell us? > > It's not a question of being able to afford it. It's a question of > comparing the value of an iPad, for it's purchase price, to the value > and functionality of a Netbook priced at or below the same price. Applications Rex. Think applications.
From: nospam on 5 Apr 2010 21:39 In article <804b3a47-31ab-437e-94ee-59b9da1b76ac(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, Rex Ballard <rex.ballard(a)gmail.com> wrote: > It's not a question of being able to afford it. It's a question of > comparing the value of an iPad, for it's purchase price, to the value > and functionality of a Netbook priced at or below the same price. the value and functionality will vary depending on what the user wants to do.
From: Hadron on 6 Apr 2010 03:11 nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> writes: > In article > <804b3a47-31ab-437e-94ee-59b9da1b76ac(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, Rex > Ballard <rex.ballard(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> It's not a question of being able to afford it. It's a question of >> comparing the value of an iPad, for it's purchase price, to the value >> and functionality of a Netbook priced at or below the same price. > > the value and functionality will vary depending on what the user wants > to do. And can you point out to me which netbook is as thin as an iPad with the same screen v case size ration and the same battery life with the same touch screen and the same rather awesome control SW? The COLA "advocates" remain, as always, totally ignorant.
From: Peter Köhlmann on 6 Apr 2010 03:33 Hadron wrote: > nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> writes: > >> In article >> <804b3a47-31ab-437e-94ee-59b9da1b76ac(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, Rex >> Ballard <rex.ballard(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> It's not a question of being able to afford it. It's a question of >>> comparing the value of an iPad, for it's purchase price, to the value >>> and functionality of a Netbook priced at or below the same price. >> >> the value and functionality will vary depending on what the user wants >> to do. > > And can you point out to me which netbook is as thin as an iPad with the > same screen v case size ration and the same battery life with the same > touch screen and the same rather awesome control SW? I am certain he will, just after you told him where the iPad user finds the many different real applications outside of the confinement of the apple store. While you are at it, you will certainly tell him how to connect his USB peripherals to that overpriced piece of junk. Lets start with something simple, let him connect a USB-drive to get some content off and on the iPad > The COLA "advocates" remain, as always, totally ignorant. While you, Hadron Snot Larry Quark, are "in the know". Just like the dumbest CSMA poster ever, OxRetard -- Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons, For thou art crunchy, and good with ketchup!
From: Peter Köhlmann on 6 Apr 2010 05:13
ZnU wrote: > In article > <804b3a47-31ab-437e-94ee-59b9da1b76ac(a)r1g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, > Rex Ballard <rex.ballard(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 31, 11:39�am, James Hopone <nospanjames.hop...(a)yahoo.com> >> wrote: > > [snip] > >> The gamble apple has taken, is that people will be willing to pay as >> much as $700 for a touch-screen with multi-touch interface rather than >> a $250 SmartBook with some of the features described above. > > Netbooks work on the same paradigm as traditional desktop computers; > they're basically the desktop user experience, but slower, smaller, and > cheaper. > > If you're not playing the meaningless "Apple vs. The World" game, and > you're looking at things purely in terms of Apple's own unit sales (and > profits), Apple's approach is obviously better. No. It is different. And for me it is obviously *not* better, but way off the mark for my needs. And so it is for lots of people < snip fanboi drivel explaining why apples coffers are much more important than customers purses > -- Tact, n.: The unsaid part of what you're thinking. |