From: Woody on
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2010-01-28, Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> I was thinking about the lack of camera aspect, and I think they may be
> >> right. Video chatting sounds good, but you'd have to hold it at a
> >> _very_ precise angle to keep yourself in view. That would become
> >> tiresome, I think.
> >
> > Not if you see yourself in the own window. For their intended audience
> > of people who don't need a computer, I think video chatting is very
> > important.
>
> Hmmm. Could be. I guess it's not that important to me as I've only had about
> 5 video chats in my life.

Same here - a video chat is the worst of all forms of communications as
far as I see, but for a lot of people they seem very important,
espcially the target audience of this device.


--
Woody
From: James Jolley on
On 2010-01-28 11:02:55 +0000, usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk (Woody) said:

> Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2010-01-28, Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking about the lack of camera aspect, and I think they may be
>>>> right. Video chatting sounds good, but you'd have to hold it at a
>>>> _very_ precise angle to keep yourself in view. That would become
>>>> tiresome, I think.
>>>
>>> Not if you see yourself in the own window. For their intended audience
>>> of people who don't need a computer, I think video chatting is very
>>> important.
>>
>> Hmmm. Could be. I guess it's not that important to me as I've only had about
>> 5 video chats in my life.
>
> Same here - a video chat is the worst of all forms of communications as
> far as I see, but for a lot of people they seem very important,
> espcially the target audience of this device.

I've used video chat when giving technical support. It's not great but
better than nothing.

From: Ian McCall on
On 2010-01-28 10:17:10 +0000, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> said:

> On 2010-01-28, James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was thinking about the lack of camera aspect, and I think they may be
>>> right. Video chatting sounds good, but you'd have to hold it at a _very_
>>> precise angle to keep yourself in view. That would become tiresome, I think.
>>
>> I think they may do a camera dock thing. PErhaps the iSee as they've
>> already had iSight? IT'll just be a camera in a case.
>
> Maybe. This is one area where I'm really on the fence about how useful it
> would actually be.

I would have given one to my mum who lives 160 miles away. Would have
been perfect for seeing the grandchildren.

Cheers,
Ian

From: Duncan Kennedy on
In message <7sd9dvFrssU1(a)mid.individual.net>, Ian McCall
<ian(a)eruvia.org> writes
>On 2010-01-28 10:17:10 +0000, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> said:
>
>> On 2010-01-28, James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote:
>>>> I was thinking about the lack of camera aspect, and I think they
>>>>may be
>>>> right. Video chatting sounds good, but you'd have to hold it at a _very_
>>>> precise angle to keep yourself in view. That would become tiresome,
>>>>think.
>>> I think they may do a camera dock thing. PErhaps the iSee as
>>>they've
>>> already had iSight? IT'll just be a camera in a case.
>> Maybe. This is one area where I'm really on the fence about how
>>useful it
>> would actually be.
>
>I would have given one to my mum who lives 160 miles away. Would have
>been perfect for seeing the grandchildren.
>
I got one hell of a fright the very first time I booted my new MBP and
this fat old codger's face appeared on my screen!

--
Duncan K
Downtown Dalgety Bay
From: Jochem Huhmann on
richard(a)cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) writes:

> In article <tj11m5tno0u8atd9pc6bnvnjmk4mesa5p2(a)4ax.com>,
> Geoff Berrow <blthecat(a)ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>!0 hours. In use? If true, that's really impressive.
>
> "Over a month of standby". What does *that* mean? Why would you
> leave it in standby instead of having it turn on instantly. Is it
> expecting to receive phone calls or data?

Because it's there in a second or out of standby. How do you have
something "instant on" if you have to boot an OS and everything?
Including the last app you had open?

I have an iPod touch and I never switch it really off. This is one of
major things for such devices, I think. Click on, use, click off. No
waiting required.


Jochem

--
"A designer knows he has arrived at perfection not when there is no
longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away."
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Prev: Apple's new baby is...
Next: Stephen Fry on the iPad