Prev: Clearing up music tags
Next: IE8 daftness...
From: Graeme on 10 Apr 2010 10:46
In message <1jgqj0z.1wfdil01rfvuu3N%me9(a)privacy.net>
me9(a)privacy.net (Bella Jones) wrote:

> Graeme <Graeme(a)greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > In message <1jgqhoc.od73zehdixshN%jim(a)magrathea.plus.com>
> > jim(a)magrathea.plus.com (Jim) wrote:
> >
> > > Bella Jones <me9(a)privacy.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > To my shame I have already forgotten what mine's called. 3GS?
> > > > > > 3GSi or something.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3gs - it says on the back!
> > > >
> > > > Can't see the back because I've got your rubber thingy on it!
> > >
> > > I claim this "fnarr!" in name of u.c.s.m!
> > >
> >
> > Beat me to it.
>
> It was a cheap one, I admit.
>

OK so I'm cheap, but affordable!

--
Graeme Wall

My genealogy website <www.greywall.demon.co.uk/genealogy/>
From: Peter Ceresole on 10 Apr 2010 12:10
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> > Can't see the back because I've got your rubber thingy on it!
>
> I claim this "fnarr!" in name of u.c.s.m!

I resisted... *Somebody* has to preserve standards here.

Ah. It's ucsm. So maybe not.
--
Peter
From: Jim on 10 Apr 2010 12:41
Peter Ceresole <peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
> > > Can't see the back because I've got your rubber thingy on it!
> >
> > I claim this "fnarr!" in name of u.c.s.m!
>
> I resisted... *Somebody* has to preserve standards here.
>
> Ah. It's ucsm. So maybe not.

[grin]

Jim
--
"Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good
product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious
understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some
slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: Ian McCall on 10 Apr 2010 12:54
On 2010-04-10 17:10:16 +0100, peter(a)cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) said:

> Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:
>
>>> Can't see the back because I've got your rubber thingy on it!
>>
>> I claim this "fnarr!" in name of u.c.s.m!
>
> I resisted... *Somebody* has to preserve standards here.
>
> Ah. It's ucsm. So maybe not.

I would argue that they did.


Cheers,
Ian

From: Woody on 10 Apr 2010 16:01
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > > > Please tell me 4.0 lets you change the system sounds.
> > >
> > > First thing I looked at. But I don't want to be the bearer of bad news!
> >
> > By system sounds I am guessing you mean message tones.
>
> That and other alert sounds, yes.
>
> I take it that's a 'no' then?

Where are alert sounds set? Can't find them.

Anyway, whereas I would hate to say 'no' to changing message tones, any
other answer would be a complete lie!

--
Woody

www.alienrat.com
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Prev: Clearing up music tags
Next: IE8 daftness...