makes no sense to me
in [Design]
|
From: Jim Thompson on 19 Jun 2010 15:47 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:16:58 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? > >http://www.ots.org/v20.php > >(somebody should do the math on that) > >John > 200 GPM ~ 1 CU.YD/min Say roughly one-sixth of the Gulf to process... only about 1 Giga Year :-) ...Jim Thompson -- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | Where is Joe McCarthy when you need him ??
From: Archimedes' Lever on 19 Jun 2010 16:02 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:47:48 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:16:58 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >>Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? >> >>http://www.ots.org/v20.php >> >>(somebody should do the math on that) >> >>John >> > >200 GPM ~ 1 CU.YD/min > >Say roughly one-sixth of the Gulf to process... only about 1 Giga Year >:-) > > ...Jim Thompson You guys are stupid to think that they want to simply grab and filter water. They want to remove the water volume from the contaminants collected, you dopey fucks. That makes the collection tanks (barges) over twice as efficient.
From: John Larkin on 19 Jun 2010 16:23 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:09:03 -0700, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:55:45 -0500, "George Jefferson" ><phreon111(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >>news:8lup1693rk4of51ej5vtoj3772et0i6b6a(a)4ax.com... >>> >>> Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? >>> >>> http://www.ots.org/v20.php >>> >>> (somebody should do the math on that) >>> >>> John >>> >> >>I was thinking the same thing. My best guess is that it will be used on the >>mixture skimmed from the surface in the hardest hit places. Obviously though >>Costner probably has no clue and is simply trying to make some money by >>using his status. > > > You guys are goddamned retards. > > He was working on this thing for the last ten years. > > He knows more about technology than any one of you uncivil fucktards. You obviously didn't see "Waterworld" John
From: krw on 19 Jun 2010 17:31 On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:03:19 -0700, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:13:09 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:16:58 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? >>> >>>http://www.ots.org/v20.php >>> >>>(somebody should do the math on that) >> >>Get AlwaysWrong to do it. > > > 6800+ barrels a day PER MACHINE get processed to yield 2750 barrels of >actual contaminant collected. Wrong newspaper article, AlwaysWrong. Try answering the question. > That makes every barge over twice as productive.
From: Sjouke Burry on 19 Jun 2010 20:19
John Larkin wrote: > Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM? > > http://www.ots.org/v20.php > > (somebody should do the math on that) > > John > > Nah, it is 1 RPD. |