makes no sense to me
in [Design]
|
From: krw on 20 Jun 2010 20:57 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:57:46 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:21:55 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:56:58 -0700, DrParnassus >><DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:21:03 -0700, John Larkin >>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Did you see his dreadful "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves" movie? People >>>>called it "Mudworld." The great thing about it was that it inspired >>>>Mel Brooks' parody, "Robin Hood: Men in Tights" >>>> >>>>John >>> >>> The question is... was it *his* movie, or was he hired to act in some >>>other fucker's bad movie? >> >>Wiki: >> >>Roger Ebert praised Morgan Freeman's performance as well as Alan >>Rickman's, but ultimately decried the film as a whole, giving it two >>stars and stating "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is a murky, >>unfocused, violent and depressing version of the classic story...The >>most depressing thing about the movie is that children will attend it >>expecting to have a good time." >> >>Carpenter also explains that Costner and the others involved in the >>Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves film have admitted to watching the Robin >>of Sherwood as inspiration for their film. >> >>John >> >> > >Ebert/Wiki == Gross Ignorance. I'd advise everyone to watch it for >themselves. > >The latest Robin Hood (Russell Crowe version) is a Paris-sewer-level >stinker. Thank you.
From: DrParnassus on 20 Jun 2010 22:20 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:21:55 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:56:58 -0700, DrParnassus ><DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote: > >>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:21:03 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>Did you see his dreadful "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves" movie? People >>>called it "Mudworld." The great thing about it was that it inspired >>>Mel Brooks' parody, "Robin Hood: Men in Tights" >>> >>>John >> >> The question is... was it *his* movie, or was he hired to act in some >>other fucker's bad movie? > >Wiki: > >Roger Ebert praised Morgan Freeman's performance as well as Alan >Rickman's, but ultimately decried the film as a whole, giving it two >stars and stating "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is a murky, >unfocused, violent and depressing version of the classic story...The >most depressing thing about the movie is that children will attend it >expecting to have a good time." > >Carpenter also explains that Costner and the others involved in the >Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves film have admitted to watching the Robin >of Sherwood as inspiration for their film. > >John > > All of which, just like you, is meaningless tripe.
From: DrParnassus on 20 Jun 2010 22:34 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:57:46 -0700, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote: >The latest Robin Hood (Russell Crowe version) is a Paris-sewer-level >stinker. Hey, at least it isn't a Parisian Politician Stink Level.
From: George Jefferson on 21 Jun 2010 08:26 "Perenis" <Perenis(a)hereforlongtime.org> wrote in message news:k50u169ulj8dob919avpvgmm0e2qutarrl(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:16:09 -0700, John Larkin > <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >> >>John > > I in fact noticed it right away too, but it was too late since I had > already posted it. > HAHA, except you have been saying Kostner!!! You noticed it right away... hahaha!!! riiiiiighhhthtt Your pathetic but I bet you revel in that?
From: DrParnassus on 21 Jun 2010 13:17
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:37:42 -0400, JW <none(a)dev.null> wrote: >It'd. Before he spell lames me. "It'd"? Hahahaha! You do the lame thing just fine, all by yourself. |