From: Nico Coesel on
John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:32:51 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET
><kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>
>>On Jun 20, 1:16 am, John Larkin
>><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>> Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM?
>>
>>It is 200 GPM times N of the water taken up from the slick. It is a
>>very
>>effective way to reduce the total volume of what is scooped up to be
>>only the oil part.
>>
>
>Three numbers:
>
>200 GPM. One barge holds almost half a million gallons.

With 32 centrifuges it takes about 13 hours to process the entire
barge. Without knowing how long it takes to scoop that amount of slick
from the water it is impossible to say whether it is fast enough or
not.

--
Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply
indicates you are not using the right tools...
nico(a)nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
--------------------------------------------------------------
From: langwadt on
On 20 Jun., 21:29, n...(a)puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel) wrote:
> John Larkin <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> >On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:32:51 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET
> ><kensm...(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>
> >>On Jun 20, 1:16 am, John Larkin
> >><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
> >>> Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM?
>
> >>It is 200 GPM times N of the water taken up from the slick.  It is a
> >>very
> >>effective way to reduce the total volume of what is scooped up to be
> >>only the oil part.
>
> >Three numbers:
>
> >200 GPM. One barge holds almost half a million gallons.
>
> With 32 centrifuges it takes about 13 hours to process the entire
> barge. Without knowing how long it takes to scoop that amount of slick
> from the water it is impossible to say whether it is fast enough or
> not.
>

think you are off by a factor of ten.

500e3/200/60/32 ~= 1.3hour

-Lasse
From: Perenis on
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:29:41 GMT, nico(a)puntnl.niks (Nico Coesel) wrote:

>John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 09:32:51 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET
>><kensmith(a)rahul.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Jun 20, 1:16 am, John Larkin
>>><jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>>> Kevin Costner is going to centrifuge the Gulf of Mexico at 200 GPM?
>>>
>>>It is 200 GPM times N of the water taken up from the slick. It is a
>>>very
>>>effective way to reduce the total volume of what is scooped up to be
>>>only the oil part.
>>>
>>
>>Three numbers:
>>
>>200 GPM. One barge holds almost half a million gallons.
>
>With 32 centrifuges it takes about 13 hours to process the entire
>barge. Without knowing how long it takes to scoop that amount of slick
>from the water it is impossible to say whether it is fast enough or
>not.


You cannot even do math right. It would at the very most take only FOUR
for a 500,000 gallon job to be done in 13 hrs. It takes longer than that
to put that much into the barge from the slick.

32? What field of work did you pursue? Hope it didn't involve math.
From: Perenis on
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:31:03 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>>
>> He has been working on it for the last ten years, idiot.
>
>That makes it even dumber. Movie star types often fall for financing
>dorky inventions; it's all they can understand.
>

You are a goddamned idiot. In the last ten years, he has worked on
SEVERAL things. All of his time was not devoted to this one project, and
even though ten years passed, there was not ten man/years worth of labor
in that period. That makes you VERY dumb, since you cannot even measure
labor with any common sense.

You really are one thick ditz.
From: Perenis on
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:31:03 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>
>You always refer to poop. You are obsessed with poop. Your life is
>centered around poop.

Sorry, John, but my life is not centered around you.