makes no sense to me
in [Design]
|
From: YD on 26 Jun 2010 09:33 Late at night, by candle light, DrParnassus <DrParnassus(a)hereforlongtime.org> penned this immortal opus: >On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:22:58 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman ><bill.sloman(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >>Language is defined by what people say, not by lists. If your list >>doesn't include "It'd" as a contraction of "It would", then your list >>is incomplete, > > It is not "the complete lest", it is "the generally accepted proper use >list", AND it would sound strange to use it in conversation, which is the >basic criteria. "Complete lest"? That's a load of old cobblers. - YD. -- Remove HAT if replying by mail.
From: YD on 26 Jun 2010 09:46 Late at night, by candle light, Pieyed Piper <pieyedPiper(a)thebongshopattheendoftheuniverse.org> penned this immortal opus: >On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 22:20:55 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> >wrote: > >>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:32:26 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Hey, leave Archie alone! LOL >> >>Why? Do you claim it as your personal property or something? > > You're all a bunch of immature little Putzes. So why do you love them so much? - YD. -- Remove HAT if replying by mail.
From: DrParnassus on 26 Jun 2010 12:11 On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:33:01 -0300, YD <ydtechHAT(a)techie.com> wrote: >That's a load You're a load. Your mother should be in prison for not flushing you the moment she shat you.
From: John Larkin on 27 Jun 2010 16:33 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:32:57 -0700, Pieyed Piper <pieyedPiper(a)thebongshopattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:41:41 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:50:30 -0700, Pieyed Piper >><pieyedPiper(a)thebongshopattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:27:39 -0700, John Larkin >>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Some people age gracefully, some don't. >>> >>> Bet I look better than you. >> >>You sure snip better than I do. > > Are you saying that the "age gracefully" remark would appear >differently with the other parts of the post which I snipped away? > > If so, what have you been smoking? >> >>So, how old are you? > > 50 Good. It's not too late for you to learn a little math, a little theory, and acquire some social skills. John
From: krw on 27 Jun 2010 17:18
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:33:02 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:32:57 -0700, Pieyed Piper ><pieyedPiper(a)thebongshopattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > >>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:41:41 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:50:30 -0700, Pieyed Piper >>><pieyedPiper(a)thebongshopattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: >>> >>>>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:27:39 -0700, John Larkin >>>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Some people age gracefully, some don't. >>>> >>>> Bet I look better than you. >>> >>>You sure snip better than I do. >> >> Are you saying that the "age gracefully" remark would appear >>differently with the other parts of the post which I snipped away? >> >> If so, what have you been smoking? >>> >>>So, how old are you? >> >> 50 > >Good. It's not too late for you to learn a little math, a little >theory, and acquire some social skills. Yes it is. |