makes no sense to me
in [Design]
|
From: John Fields on 25 Jun 2010 13:53 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:56:41 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >Would it be uncivil of me to call you a bunch of decrepid, squabbling >old hens? --- Can't stand not being in the limelight?
From: John Fields on 25 Jun 2010 14:11 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:27:39 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:40:12 -0700, Pieyed Piper ><pieyedPiper(a)thebongshopattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote: > >>On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 07:56:41 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>Would it be uncivil of me to call you a bunch of decrepid, squabbling >>>old hens? >>> >>>John >> >> What are you though, assessment boy? > >What language are you writing in? > >> >> I know the answer. > >I suspect you are a member of that same coop. How old are you, anyhow? > >Some people age gracefully, some don't. --- And some start out ungraceful. JF
From: Bill Sloman on 25 Jun 2010 19:29 On Jun 25, 6:54 pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:17:13 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman > > > > <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >On Jun 25, 5:47 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:37:11 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman > > >> <bill.slo...(a)ieee.org> wrote: > >> >On Jun 25, 12:19 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> > >> >wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:03:03 -0700 (PDT),Bill Sloman > >> >> >If listeners have an appreciable chance of > >> >> >misundertanding what is said to them, the speakers will amend what > >> >> >they say until it is creates a predictable effect on their listeners. > > >> >> --- > >> >> Got an example? > >> >> --- > > >> >Go find a linguistics text-book. Individual tutoring is reserved for > >> >students with some evidence of talent. > > >> --- > >> So you don't have an example? > >> --- > > >To waste on you? > > --- > Nope; to prove to everyone that you know what you're talking about. > --- They'll just have to rely on their common sense. <snipped the rest. John Fields gets tedious remarkably rapidly> -- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
From: MassiveProng on 25 Jun 2010 19:54 On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:18:05 -0400, JW <scatboy(a)dev.null> wrote: >ball-gag More insight as to just what you are about.
From: MassiveProng on 25 Jun 2010 19:57
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 03:32:26 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hey, More proof of your abject immaturity. |