``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature)
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Solutions Manual, Test Bank, Instructor's Manual [NEW Collection] 22/11/2008
Next: Quantum Gravity 299.1: Russia Moves Toward Reals Rather Than Complex Numbers in Physics
From: mahipal7638 on 4 Dec 2008 13:20 On Dec 4, 11:29 am, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 9:56 am, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > On Dec 2, 2:44 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 1, 11:34 am, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Good day, > > > > > The links below are just a page in length. > > > > >http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/meforce.pdf > > > [dvi form snipped] > > > > Your feedback, objective or otherwise, is welcomed. > > > > I doubt it. > > > > Your page is bad poetry. > > > I claim the meforce page as Poetic, not exactly poetry. The thought is > > poetic. > > See? I didn't expect feedback to be welcomed. It's posters like you that give Usenet a bad name. I read your input. I ended up giving you a high school level lesson on the linear relation e=mcc. Which you promptly snipped as if it never was. Nice honest move. Your feedback was welcomed, but it was just plain wrong. Try search for "y=mx" in any Calculus book. Then play, or fumble, if you will, with derivatives. > > > > You *assume* that an equation isn't true. Then you > > > use the non-truth of that equation to prove things > > > that follow from a completely different equation. > > > > This is not even wrong. > > > It's logical reasoning. It's imagining. It's a written concrete > > literary construct. > > It's not even reasononing, never mind logical. That's not even cute. Learn to spell, or read-then-cut-and-paste. If not that, learn to spell check. Think ten times before hitting the send button. > > Maybe if I restate it for you. Here's what you did. > > A is true. > Assume A is not true. > Therefore B (which is pulled out of the air and is not true > in the context) implies C. That's too simplistic and nowhere near what I actually do. I too, am constrained by Logic. In Math, the difference between some function equalling 0, and not 0, independent of magnitude of the entity involved, is meaningfully consequential. > It is not reasononing at all. It is bad poetry. Don't forget to learn to spell check. There's a difference between poetry and poetic. Good or bad poetry, a poem, a physics based mathematical poem, meforce is. "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An Obviousism. However anyone arrives at the conclusion is primarily simply an act of paraphrasing. Using Leibniz's Law to get there, is unique and timeless. Then by accident of Language, $me$ is me is self- referential. It, being $me$, is an arts(y) coinicidence. > > > Besides, fumbling with math equations is freely allowed within the > > constraints imposed by the Laws of Physics on human hands and writing > > tools. > > Fumbling with equations seems to be your limit. Fumbling, with words and/or equations, is all there is for any person at all engaged in Writing. People have gone through the trouble of writing algorithms to generate meaningful sentences via CPUs. > > You seriously need some remedial instruction. > I don't have the time it would take, which would be > some months at least. You need to go back to some > place around about age 15. Maybe earlier. > Socks- Hide quoted text - Yeah. Sure. What's your age? Actually, you probably can't count that high. So nevermind. Enjo(y). -- Mahipal ``We search our Earth and her limitless skies all the while discovering in our hearts and minds is where heaven lies'' http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/
From: Puppet_Sock on 4 Dec 2008 15:38 On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: [snip] > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > Obviousism. Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. You should send your photo into failblog.org. Bet you anything it would get published. Seriously dude, I wish you'd been in one of the classes I was TA for. It would have been a lot of fun putting big fat F's on your homework assignments. Socks
From: mahipal7638 on 5 Dec 2008 09:55 On Dec 4, 3:38 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > [snip] > > > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > > Obviousism. > > Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. Site an example of when and what mass is constant in Nature. > You should send your photo into failblog.org. Bet you > anything it would get published. I'm not lacking publicity. There are plenty of silent readers. A few need to update their webpages to keep track of my current active web link. > Seriously dude, I wish you'd been in one of the classes I was > TA for. It would have been a lot of fun putting big fat F's on > your homework assignments. Where were you a TA? > Socks Do you have a name given to you by your Parents? Enjo(y). -- Mahipal "One survives being Educated" Virdy ``We search our Earth and her limitless skies all the while discovering in our hearts and minds is where heaven lies'' http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/
From: Androcles on 5 Dec 2008 10:15 <mahipal7638(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:cb7d62aa-86b7-4f80-9a53-fdfb25b8f8fd(a)t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On Dec 4, 3:38 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > [snip] > > > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > > Obviousism. > > Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. Site an example of when and what mass is constant in Nature. ========================================== Ok, er... Trafalgar Square, London. Or did you want an example cited? If so you used the wrong poetic homonym.
From: mahipal7638 on 8 Dec 2008 16:31
On Dec 5, 10:15 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:cb7d62aa-86b7-4f80-9a53-fdfb25b8f8fd(a)t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 4, 3:38 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > [snip] > > > > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > > > Obviousism. > > > Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. > > Site an example of when and what mass is constant in Nature. > > ========================================== > Ok, er... Trafalgar Square, London. Or did you want an example cited? > If so you used the wrong poetic homonym. I accept the written word is often subject to varied interpretations. But an example of constant mass is pending. I asked to make a point. Thanks for making a funny. It shows character. Your example of constant Sunday Mass, is, if you examine it more closely, never exactly the same. One can never go to the same river twice. Same hymn, changed incantation every time. Otherwise, repetition would be deafening. While on the influence of Languages, mostly of the poetic kind, there's this First Commandment, that mentions a $me$. Homonyms, not my invention. Nor Maths, nor words with meanings. Nor http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza/ ... there's a lot I can't take credit for. Poetic Axiom of Nature: All mass is restless. Enjo(y). -- Mahipal ``We search our Earth and her limitless skies all the while discovering in our hearts and minds is where heaven lies'' http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/ |