``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature)
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Solutions Manual, Test Bank, Instructor's Manual [NEW Collection] 22/11/2008
Next: Quantum Gravity 299.1: Russia Moves Toward Reals Rather Than Complex Numbers in Physics
From: Androcles on 8 Dec 2008 18:57 <mahipal7638(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:e2706f2d-080e-4afe-a2a2-c5274cf7d480(a)w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On Dec 5, 10:15 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:cb7d62aa-86b7-4f80-9a53-fdfb25b8f8fd(a)t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 4, 3:38 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > [snip] > > > > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > > > Obviousism. > > > Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. > > Site an example of when and what mass is constant in Nature. > > ========================================== > Ok, er... Trafalgar Square, London. Or did you want an example cited? > If so you used the wrong poetic homonym. I accept the written word is often subject to varied interpretations. ============================================ Different written words with different spelling such as site, sight, cite, slight and sleight have different meanings. ============================================ But an example of constant mass is pending. I asked to make a point. Thanks for making a funny. It shows character. ============================================ Energy is relative, E = 1/2 mv^2 and v is relative. If I throw a stone away from you it will have negative energy relative to you because it cannot strike you, unlike a stone thrown toward you with constant mass m. Should you argue that the mass of the stone may be converted to energy I would not disagree, but you will not receive all that energy unless it elastically collides elsewhere and is reflected in your direction. ============================================ Your example of constant Sunday Mass, is, if you examine it more closely, never exactly the same. =========================================== I made no such example, you are hallucinating.
From: mahipal7638 on 9 Dec 2008 10:14 On Dec 8, 6:57 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:e2706f2d-080e-4afe-a2a2-c5274cf7d480(a)w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 5, 10:15 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > > > > > > > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:cb7d62aa-86b7-4f80-9a53-fdfb25b8f8fd(a)t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > > On Dec 4, 3:38 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > > > > Obviousism. > > > > Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. > > > Site an example of when and what mass is constant in Nature. > > > ========================================== > > Ok, er... Trafalgar Square, London. Or did you want an example cited? > > If so you used the wrong poetic homonym. > > I accept the written word is often subject to varied interpretations. > ============================================ > Different written words with different spelling such as site, sight, cite, > slight and sleight have different meanings. > ============================================ O, I wasn't thinking of mere individual words. It's rude and impolite to break down others' paragraphs, into sentences, or, even worse, into words. We already know how they breakdown into alphabits. It's just plain inconsiderate given how technology has made bits available on the order of gigabytes. > But an example of constant mass is pending. I asked to make a point. > Thanks for making a funny. It shows character. > ============================================ > Energy is relative, E = 1/2 mv^2 and v is relative. If I throw a stone > away from you it will have negative energy relative to you because > it cannot strike you, unlike a stone thrown toward you with > constant mass m. The kinetic energy of the stone, thrown towards or away from me, is a positive definite quantity. Only the velocity has direction. Relativity yields that the mass of the stone is variable with its changing velocity magnitude. > Should you argue that the mass of the stone may be converted to > energy I would not disagree, but you will not receive all that energy > unless it elastically collides elsewhere and is reflected in your direction. > ============================================ > > Your example of constant Sunday Mass, is, if you examine it more > closely, never exactly the same. > =========================================== > I made no such example, you are hallucinating. Hallucinations, built-in human mind functionality, are a nice welcomed break. From my perspective, I apparently gave your words more credit than you admit they deserved. Enjo(y). -- Mahipal ``We search our Earth and her limitless skies all the while discovering in our hearts and minds is where heaven lies'' http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/
From: mahipal7638 on 9 Dec 2008 12:54 On Dec 9, 10:14 am, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > On Dec 8, 6:57 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > > > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:e2706f2d-080e-4afe-a2a2-c5274cf7d480(a)w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com.... > > On Dec 5, 10:15 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > > > > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >news:cb7d62aa-86b7-4f80-9a53-fdfb25b8f8fd(a)t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com.... > > > On Dec 4, 3:38 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > > > > > Obviousism. > > > > > Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. > > > > Site an example of when and what mass is constant in Nature. > > > > ========================================== > > > Ok, er... Trafalgar Square, London. Or did you want an example cited? > > > If so you used the wrong poetic homonym. > > > I accept the written word is often subject to varied interpretations. > > ============================================ > > Different written words with different spelling such as site, sight, cite, > > slight and sleight have different meanings. > > ============================================ > > O, I wasn't thinking of mere individual words. Ok I fumbled. You focused on Site/Cite, where I was on mass/mass. Mea cupla. I am known to make such errors of/from pronounciation. I've written mute for moot. It's in my cross-cultural upbringing, and I realize spell checkers alone are not enough. I confuse Mary for Meri; such for such. Happens. Regardless, Trafalgar Square is not a example of "Show me an example..." Language can lead to funny times. That's all good and expected. Enjo(y). -- Mahipal "In Hindi, such means true" Virdy ``We search our Earth and her limitless skies all the while discovering in our hearts and minds is where heaven lies'' http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/
From: Androcles on 9 Dec 2008 13:23 <mahipal7638(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:9c750957-10d9-43bc-9c8f-dc66fd2b6410(a)f3g2000vbf.googlegroups.com... On Dec 8, 6:57 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:e2706f2d-080e-4afe-a2a2-c5274cf7d480(a)w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 5, 10:15 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > > > > > > > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:cb7d62aa-86b7-4f80-9a53-fdfb25b8f8fd(a)t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > > On Dec 4, 3:38 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > > > > Obviousism. > > > > Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. > > > Site an example of when and what mass is constant in Nature. > > > ========================================== > > Ok, er... Trafalgar Square, London. Or did you want an example cited? > > If so you used the wrong poetic homonym. > > I accept the written word is often subject to varied interpretations. > ============================================ > Different written words with different spelling such as site, sight, cite, > slight and sleight have different meanings. > ============================================ O, I wasn't thinking of mere individual words. It's rude and impolite to break down others' paragraphs, into sentences, or, even worse, into words. ============================================== Yeah, well, I never claimed to be otherwise. A pity if that hurts your lousy feelings. ============================================== We already know how they breakdown into alphabits. It's just plain inconsiderate given how technology has made bits available on the order of gigabytes. > But an example of constant mass is pending. I asked to make a point. > Thanks for making a funny. It shows character. > ============================================ > Energy is relative, E = 1/2 mv^2 and v is relative. If I throw a stone > away from you it will have negative energy relative to you because > it cannot strike you, unlike a stone thrown toward you with > constant mass m. The kinetic energy of the stone, thrown towards or away from me, is a positive definite quantity. Only the velocity has direction. Relativity yields that the mass of the stone is variable with its changing velocity magnitude. > Should you argue that the mass of the stone may be converted to > energy I would not disagree, but you will not receive all that energy > unless it elastically collides elsewhere and is reflected in your > direction. > ============================================ > > Your example of constant Sunday Mass, is, if you examine it more > closely, never exactly the same. > =========================================== > I made no such example, you are hallucinating. Hallucinations, built-in human mind functionality, are a nice welcomed break. =========================================== It's rude, impolite, dishonest and highly unethical to accuse others of making statements they did not make. Enjoy your dreaming.
From: Androcles on 9 Dec 2008 13:32
<mahipal7638(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:7e805793-1636-4eb9-9efb-acc3cad15751(a)w24g2000prd.googlegroups.com... On Dec 9, 10:14 am, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > On Dec 8, 6:57 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > > > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:e2706f2d-080e-4afe-a2a2-c5274cf7d480(a)w35g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > On Dec 5, 10:15 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > > > > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >news:cb7d62aa-86b7-4f80-9a53-fdfb25b8f8fd(a)t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... > > > On Dec 4, 3:38 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 4, 1:20 pm, mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > "$me$ always changes" is a Physics Truism. It's a given. An > > > > > Obviousism. > > > > > Well, except when mass is constant. Which is lots of the time. > > > > Site an example of when and what mass is constant in Nature. > > > > ========================================== > > > Ok, er... Trafalgar Square, London. Or did you want an example cited? > > > If so you used the wrong poetic homonym. > > > I accept the written word is often subject to varied interpretations. > > ============================================ > > Different written words with different spelling such as site, sight, > > cite, > > slight and sleight have different meanings. > > ============================================ > > O, I wasn't thinking of mere individual words. Ok I fumbled. You focused on Site/Cite, where I was on mass/mass. Mea cupla. I am known to make such errors of/from pronounciation. I've written mute for moot. It's in my cross-cultural upbringing, and I realize spell checkers alone are not enough. I confuse Mary for Meri; such for such. ================ and "cupla" for "culpa", "pronounciation" for "pronunciation", for which you are culpable. ================ Happens. Regardless, Trafalgar Square is not a example of "Show me an example..." ========================================== Correct, it is a site of when and what mass is constant in Nature. ========================================== |