``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature)
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Solutions Manual, Test Bank, Instructor's Manual [NEW Collection] 22/11/2008
Next: Quantum Gravity 299.1: Russia Moves Toward Reals Rather Than Complex Numbers in Physics
From: mahipal7638 on 10 Dec 2008 17:37 On Dec 2, 11:58 am, w...(a)scarlet.be wrote: > mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > On Dec 1, 12:54 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >> <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/meforce.pdf32768 Bytes > >>>http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/meforce.dvifewer Bytes > > >>> Your feedback, objective or otherwise, is welcomed. > > It seems simpler to me to see > e~m, > ie to consider e and m as values (expressed in different units) of a > same > entity "energy-mass". This seems to be the modern underlying thought/quandary. Energy is mass, mass is energy, but what is either? Or, what do we do with this identity, this knowledge? > My personal view is that the energy content of lightclocks (either as > gauging tools or as composing entities for matter) contributes to the > mass > content of a matter particle. I view lightclocks as the mechanism of > transforming light speed particles into infraluminal mass particles. > In this > my view, even "rest mass" would consist of lightclock energy. > I'd agree this can't be the whole story but I think it conributes to > it. > See my SR pageshttp://home.scarlet.be/~pin12499/paratwin.htm#MySRT.http://home.scarlet.be/~pin12499/qbRelaty.html > guido google wugi I really like your links. I had aspired to be a graphics developer myself once; because moving pictures speak louder than thousands of words. I visited your links at least a week back. But you need a good abstract or summary of what your simulations and website offer. Contributing to a better geometrical understanding of SRT, of TP, is a nice introduction. But I'm sure I missed something still, so do not shy away from focusing my attention to something I might've overlooked. Lightclocks are hypotherical devices serving as guides in thought experiments. I respect English is a second language to you and me both. How is lightclock, either energy or mass, contained in rest mass? Enjo(y). -- Mahipal As much as I enjoy lingusitic quirks, especially those which are mathematically inclined, I forget how many radians that is, I've deleted both sci.math and sci.lang. Readers in sci.lang must be thankful that both physics and math are gone as subject matters. Readers in sci.math can't ever be happ(y), matter-energy or not; abstractions are their life. http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/
From: Androcles on 10 Dec 2008 17:46 <mahipal7638(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:49772e86-9530-4d0a-a9ae-e7abd4919c49(a)e1g2000pra.googlegroups.com... On Dec 2, 11:58 am, w...(a)scarlet.be wrote: > mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > On Dec 1, 12:54 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >> <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/meforce.pdf32768 Bytes > >>>http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/meforce.dvifewer Bytes > > >>> Your feedback, objective or otherwise, is welcomed. > > It seems simpler to me to see > e~m, > ie to consider e and m as values (expressed in different units) of a > same > entity "energy-mass". This seems to be the modern underlying thought/quandary. Energy is mass, mass is energy, but what is either? Or, what do we do with this identity, this knowledge? > My personal view is that the energy content of lightclocks (either as > gauging tools or as composing entities for matter) contributes to the > mass > content of a matter particle. I view lightclocks as the mechanism of > transforming light speed particles into infraluminal mass particles. > In this > my view, even "rest mass" would consist of lightclock energy. > I'd agree this can't be the whole story but I think it conributes to > it. > See my SR > pageshttp://home.scarlet.be/~pin12499/paratwin.htm#MySRT.http://home.scarlet.be/~pin12499/qbRelaty.html > guido google wugi I really like your links. I had aspired to be a graphics developer myself once; because moving pictures speak louder than thousands of words. I visited your links at least a week back. But you need a good abstract or summary of what your simulations and website offer. Contributing to a better geometrical understanding of SRT, of TP, is a nice introduction. But I'm sure I missed something still, so do not shy away from focusing my attention to something I might've overlooked. =============================================== HAHAHAHA! Here's a better geometrical understanding of bullshit. http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/PoR/PoR.htm Lightclocks are hypotherical devices serving as guides in thought experiments. I respect English is a second language to you and me both. How is lightclock, either energy or mass, contained in rest mass? Enjo(y). -- Mahipal As much as I enjoy lingusitic quirks, especially those which are mathematically inclined, I forget how many radians that is, I've deleted both sci.math and sci.lang. Readers in sci.lang must be thankful that both physics and math are gone as subject matters. Readers in sci.math can't ever be happ(y), matter-energy or not; abstractions are their life. http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/
From: mahipal7638 on 11 Dec 2008 08:45 On Dec 10, 6:06 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote in message > > news:1GX%k.50831$xx1.17906(a)newsfe24.ams2... > > > <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >news:49772e86-9530-4d0a-a9ae-e7abd4919c49(a)e1g2000pra.googlegroups.com... > > On Dec 2, 11:58 am, w...(a)scarlet.be wrote: > >> mahipal7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > >> > On Dec 1, 12:54 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics> wrote: > >> >> <mahipal7...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >> >>>http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/meforce.pdf32768Bytes > >> >>>http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/meforce.dvifewerBytes > > >> >>> Your feedback, objective or otherwise, is welcomed. > > >> It seems simpler to me to see > >> e~m, > >> ie to consider e and m as values (expressed in different units) of a > >> same > >> entity "energy-mass". > > > This seems to be the modern underlying thought/quandary. Energy is > > mass, mass is energy, but what is either? Or, what do we do with this > > identity, this knowledge? > > >> My personal view is that the energy content of lightclocks (either as > >> gauging tools or as composing entities for matter) contributes to the > >> mass > >> content of a matter particle. I view lightclocks as the mechanism of > >> transforming light speed particles into infraluminal mass particles. > >> In this > >> my view, even "rest mass" would consist of lightclock energy. > >> I'd agree this can't be the whole story but I think it conributes to > >> it. > >> See my SR > >> pageshttp://home.scarlet.be/~pin12499/paratwin.htm#MySRT.http://home.scarl... > >> guido google wugi > > > I really like your links. I had aspired to be a graphics developer > > myself once; because moving pictures speak louder than thousands of > > words. I visited your links at least a week back. But you need a good > > abstract or summary of what your simulations and website offer. > > Contributing to a better geometrical understanding of SRT, of TP, is a > > nice introduction. But I'm sure I missed something still, so do not > > shy away from focusing my attention to something I might've > > overlooked. > > =============================================== > > HAHAHAHA! > > Here's a better geometrical understanding of bullshit. > > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/PoR/PoR.htm > > > Lightclocks are hypotherical devices > > Nonsense, I've buil(r) one, (r)hey'(t)e no(r) hypo(r)he(r)ical, (r)hey a(t)e > (t)eal. > http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/lightclock.gif > > You seem to have your r's and t's mixed up. Androcles, you are talking to yourself, about yourself. Your gifs and pages are nonsense. You need attention in a sad desperate way. Start your own threads instead of hounding _everybody_ else that posts. You are not funny, never will be intelligent. Get off my case. It's a big Internet that you can find out if someone will follow-up on your own initiated threads or webpages. Enjo(y)... Mahipal "Maturity is a Virtue" http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/
From: mahipal7638 on 22 Dec 2008 11:36
Good day, Per a discussion, some time ago, thank you Google, I've added a group. Science, Fact or Fiction, is still Science. Remember, the meforce will be with you always. http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/meforce.pdf Please reference/read the link below. If you have to fiddle with it to work, thanks for your effort. I can simply cut and paste the link. I have tested that it works. I do not have to, or should not have to, rewrite what has already been... http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/29e8033a8bf55df7/fed4256de0983615#fed4256de0983615 The language group may also realize why I have posted there. Your feedback, objective or otherwise, is always welcomed. Enjo(y)... -- Mahipal ``We search our Earth and her limitless skies all the while discovering in our hearts and minds is where heaven lies'' http://mysite.verizon.net/mahipalvirdy/ |