proof of Goldbach conjecture
in [Math]
|
From: eestath on 4 Dec 2009 10:31 and you just said nothing... Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.
From: Dik T. Winter on 4 Dec 2009 10:50 In article <fc672ffa-444c-4bd8-88fd-d6991149902f(a)z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> eestath <stathopoulosee(a)gmail.com> writes: > Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. > > THANK YOU VERY MUTCH MY FRIEND ALL I WANTED IS TO KNOW WHY? > YOU ANSWERED CORRECTLY:) WAS THIS SO HARD! > YES IT IS OBVIOUS!:) Why are you answering so insulting? -- dik t. winter, cwi, science park 123, 1098 xg amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131 home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~dik/
From: Pubkeybreaker on 4 Dec 2009 11:28 On Dec 4, 10:50 am, "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Win...(a)cwi.nl> wrote: > In article <fc672ffa-444c-4bd8-88fd-d69911499...(a)z41g2000yqz.googlegroups..com> eestath <stathopoulo...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. > > > > THANK YOU VERY MUTCH MY FRIEND ALL I WANTED IS TO KNOW WHY? > > YOU ANSWERED CORRECTLY:) WAS THIS SO HARD! > > YES IT IS OBVIOUS!:) > > Why are you answering so insulting? Because: A cranks is a crank, of course, of course, And noone can talk to a crank, of course, Unless the crank who shouts himself hoarse, Isn't clueless, dumb, or dead.
From: eestath on 5 Dec 2009 09:12 if mathematics would depend on what you could make sense to you it would simply stop to exist!:) i said something if you fail to understand it is ok!i bet is not the first time! can you disprove it:) NO arturo had the confendce that could disprove something an he did... can you do the same thing... first try to understand, then find the error!:)
From: eestath on 5 Dec 2009 09:50
just see this and the answer will come to you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48TR0vUPQCs |