From: Dom on 7 Dec 2009 11:14 On Dec 2, 2:04 am, eestath <stathopoulo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > This is *exactly the same* as saying: > > "If for every n>4, the two prime numbers p and q satisfy p=/=q, > then for every m>4, if m is even then m is the sum of two prime > numbers. " > > No it is not what i say : > > If p/=q then it does not exist k sutch that p+q/=2k! As stated, the above is false: 3=/=5 and there exits k=5 such that 3+5=/=2(5). The rephrased statement: "If p=/=q then there exists k such that p +q=2k" is obviously true since p+q=2[(p+q)/2]
From: Tim Little on 9 Dec 2009 18:53 On 2009-12-09, Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. <ostap_bender_1900(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > The real question is: > > Was it **really** Ataturk's order mandating prostitutes to wear veils, > that lead to the drastic reduction in veil/scarf wearing by Turkish > women, or is this one of those urban legends/myths? Facts? Why confuse a simple discussion of rationality by bringing facts into it? ;-) - Tim
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 9 Dec 2009 20:41 On Dec 9, 3:53 pm, Tim Little <t...(a)little-possums.net> wrote: > On 2009-12-09, Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > The real question is: > > > Was it **really** Ataturk's order mandating prostitutes to wear veils, > > that lead to the drastic reduction in veil/scarf wearing by Turkish > > women, or is this one of those urban legends/myths? > > Facts? Why confuse a simple discussion of rationality by bringing > facts into it? ;-) > If I gave a serious reply - wouldn't I be accused of having no sense of humour?
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 9 Dec 2009 21:11
On Dec 9, 3:53 pm, Tim Little <t...(a)little-possums.net> wrote: > On 2009-12-09, Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > The real question is: > > > Was it **really** Ataturk's order mandating prostitutes to wear veils, > > that lead to the drastic reduction in veil/scarf wearing by Turkish > > women, or is this one of those urban legends/myths? > > Facts? Why confuse a simple discussion of rationality by bringing > facts into it? ;-) > An engineer and a mathematician are staying in a hotel room while attending a conference. A fire starts in the room. The engineer wakes up and smells smoke. He goes to the bathroom, he fills a trashcan with water and douses the fire. He goes back to bed. But he doesn't finish the job completely, and the fire returns. Later, the mathematician wakes up and smells smoke. He goes to the bathroom, sees the water faucet, thinks for a moment and then exclaims: 'Aha! A solution exists!' and then goes back to bed. |