proof of Goldbach conjecture
in [Math]
|
From: Pubkeybreaker on 5 Dec 2009 16:02 On Dec 2, 1:02�pm, Arturo Magidin <magi...(a)member.ams.org> wrote: > On Dec 2, 1:04�am, eestath <stathopoulo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > You have been abusive and impolite from the very beginning, by > repeatedly sending me unwanted e-mail despite my requests that you not > do so. Calling you an idiot at this point is not lack of politeness, > it is a simple statement of fact. > I too received private and very hostile emails from this person. They were full of profanity as well. Let's all simply ignore him.
From: eestath on 5 Dec 2009 18:22 i am in Greece i do not think i am very hostile from here:) if you make accusation simply...take a minute before you say something:) you proved your point...!!!!!!!!!!:) HAVE A NICE DAY:)
From: fernando revilla on 5 Dec 2009 20:07 eestath wrote: > Theorem > > Golbach conjecture is true for every n>4 if the two > prime numbers are > different Perhaps you meant: G_n : " ( n>4 even number) and ( n=p_n + q_n , p_n, q_n primes) " (G_n)^* : " ( n>4 even number) and ( n=p_n + q_n , p_n, q_n primes) and (p_n=/=q_n) ". Then, (G_n)^* => G_n In that case, your theorem is true. An alternative proof is: Proof: It is a particular case of the tautology (p and q and r) => (p and q). Regards.
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 7 Dec 2009 02:56 On Dec 4, 8:28 am, Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Dec 4, 10:50 am, "Dik T. Winter" <Dik.Win...(a)cwi.nl> wrote: > > > In article <fc672ffa-444c-4bd8-88fd-d69911499...(a)z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> eestath <stathopoulo...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. > > > > > > THANK YOU VERY MUTCH MY FRIEND ALL I WANTED IS TO KNOW WHY? > > > YOU ANSWERED CORRECTLY:) WAS THIS SO HARD! > > > YES IT IS OBVIOUS!:) > > > Why are you answering so insulting? > > Because: > > A cranks is a crank, of course, of course, > And noone can talk to a crank, of course, > Unless the crank who shouts himself hoarse, > Isn't clueless, dumb, or dead. > "Crank" comes form the German word for "sick/ill".
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 7 Dec 2009 03:07
On Dec 4, 3:03 am, eestath <stathopoulo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. > > THANK YOU VERY MUTCH MY FRIEND ALL I WANTED IS TO KNOW WHY? > YOU ANSWERED CORRECTLY:) WAS THIS SO HARD! > Yes, explaining even the most obvious things to you is indeed very hard. > > YES IT IS OBVIOUS!:) > This reminds me of a good Russian joke: A professor is giving a lecture to a college class. In the middle of his lecture he says: - From this, it is obvious that the series is bounded. Student X meekly raises his hand: - Why is this obvious? Professor explains: - Because of <this> and <that>. Student: - But what about <this>, <this> and <that> and the <other>? So, they keep on their discussion for the next 5 hours, having exhausted all blackboards in the building. Finally, they finish with satisfaction. The other students ask student X: - What did you guys figure out? - The professor was right: it is obvious. |