simulating local lexical variables with symbol macros
in [Lisp]
|
Prev: Mistake in the specification of rotatef ?
Next: [ann] LTK based libraries Runtime Library 3.0 and Gestalt Items 1.1
From: Madhu on 18 Nov 2009 01:29 * mdj <6ac15a82-c0bb-4507-bfa1-c8db6bc2a4d4(a)u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com> : Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:15:29 -0800 (PST): |> | You do realise don't you, that repeatedly calling me a troll while |> | all your arguments fall to pieces is the intellectual equivalent of |> | a small child placing its hands over it's ears and yelling |> | "LALALALALALALA" so it can no longer hear the truth ? |> |> You miss my point. I am not here to prove my intellectual prowess or |> bickering about language you are trolling for. My intention was to |> use the english language to make a point. I thought you misunderstood |> unintentionally, and sought to clarify it. You are just trolling to |> bicker about language. Arent you exhibiting the OCD you started |> accusing me of ? | | No, I'm pointing out the dishonest and nasty behaviour you keep | indulging in, and calling you on it whenever you try to hide your | malicious intent behind a scientific concept. What Nasty behaviour? What malicious intent? What scientific concept? | This is easy. |> |> I was using the word in a sense you were not familiar with. What is |> |> important is the point I was making through it, not bickering about |> |> the word, which is the object of your trolls |> | |> | I'm quite familiar with the sense you used the word in. |> |> There is a subjective view in which this can be shown to be a lie. | | In what subjective sense is a lie not a lie ? | | No, wait. That's a question. We know you don't answer questions. You just want to indulge in pathological bickering to display your l33t english language skills. Do you have any other point to make? -- Madhu
From: mdj on 18 Nov 2009 01:33 On Nov 18, 4:10 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > * mdj <d0233017-3433-469e-b15e-424950027...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com> : > Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:05:58 -0800 (PST): > > | On Nov 18, 1:57 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > |> Why dont you post a few articles on lisp or something and maybe come > |> back to this thread later? All you are doing is continuing to ``return > |> each remark with a machine gun burst of no less than than than four > |> preposterous remarks each just screaming for rebuttal'' (in Ken Tilton's > |> words observed of Garret's tactics in > |> <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/f965378a4e2d4abe> ) > | > | Since Ken has already posted to this thread and pointed out that is > | observations of Ron in that context don't apply to me, > > But They do. "Everyone" can see that. Either my newsfeed is broken or there's a lot of extra voices in your head agreeing with you. Which one, it's hard to tell. Maybe "Everyone" will chime in and clear it up. > | continuing to post this only makes you look like more of an idiot > | than you already do, and provides yet another example (like we needed > | one) of your stupidity and dishonesty. > | > | Shame on you :-P > > The dishonesty is on your part. Oh yes, shame on my for being so crooked and taking Ken at his word!
From: Madhu on 18 Nov 2009 01:35 * mdj <c26c6206-bccb-4e15-93b6-5ea60d1d173a(a)m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com> : Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:26:41 -0800 (PST): | On Nov 18, 3:35 pm, Kenneth Tilton <kentil...(a)gmail.com> wrote: | |> Jeez, what a suck up! | | Now that's just cheap. After starting the joke the least you could do | is run with for a bit. In case you missed it the joke is carried on elsewhere in your respnse to Ron | Bloody New Yorkers, always in a hurry :-P -- Madhu
From: Madhu on 18 Nov 2009 01:37 * mdj <069eaaed-3557-4d94-b874-7b21f85353e9(a)a39g2000pre.googlegroups.com> : Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:33:29 -0800 (PST): |> |> Why dont you post a few articles on lisp or something and maybe come |> |> back to this thread later? All you are doing is continuing to ``return |> |> each remark with a machine gun burst of no less than than than four |> |> preposterous remarks each just screaming for rebuttal'' (in Ken Tilton's |> |> words observed of Garret's tactics in |> |> <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/f965378a4e2d4abe> ) |> | |> | Since Ken has already posted to this thread and pointed out that is |> | observations of Ron in that context don't apply to me, |> |> But They do. "Everyone" can see that. | | Oh yes, shame on my for being so crooked and taking Ken at his word! You really want me to tell you what logical fallacy you are comitting here dont you? troll -- Madhu
From: mdj on 18 Nov 2009 01:42
On Nov 18, 4:14 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > | No, I'm intent on exposing you as a fraud. > > Have you succeeded yet? I believe so. All the evidence of course is circumstantial, but the extremely one dimensional nature of it does not permit any other conclusion. Tally ho. |