simulating local lexical variables with symbol macros
in [Lisp]
|
Prev: Mistake in the specification of rotatef ?
Next: [ann] LTK based libraries Runtime Library 3.0 and Gestalt Items 1.1
From: mdj on 18 Nov 2009 02:22 On Nov 18, 5:13 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > * mdj <b5eb427a-9e5a-4985-9794-2f63ef989...(a)b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com> : > Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:05:10 -0800 (PST): > > | On Nov 18, 4:37 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > | > |> |> But They do. "Everyone" can see that. > |> | > |> | Oh yes, shame on my for being so crooked and taking Ken at his word! > |> > |> You really want me to tell you what logical fallacy you are comitting > |> here dont you? > | > | I did not make that (admittedly sarcastic) remark in response to that > | statement, you deleted text to make it appear that way. > > Here is the context reinserted: > > * mdj <d0233017-3433-469e-b15e-424950027...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com> : > Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:05:58 -0800 (PST): > > | On Nov 18, 1:57=C2=A0pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > |> Why dont you post a few articles on lisp or something and maybe come > |> back to this thread later? All you are doing is continuing to ``return > |> each remark with a machine gun burst of no less than than than four > |> preposterous remarks each just screaming for rebuttal'' (in Ken Tilton's > |> words observed of Garret's tactics in > |> <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/f965378a4e2d4abe> ) > | > | Since Ken has already posted to this thread and pointed out that is > | observations of Ron in that context don't apply to me, > > They do apply to all your activity on comp.lang.lisp No, they don't. It only looks that way to you. > You really want me to tell you what logical fallacy you are comitting > here dont you? No. I've already convinced myself you're incapable of such. Your further input on this point is neither requested nor required.
From: mdj on 18 Nov 2009 02:25 On Nov 18, 4:45 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > * mdj <eacee83c-aed4-4b7a-a311-d44c4f4e2...(a)t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com> : > Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:42:21 -0800 (PST): > > | On Nov 18, 4:14 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > | > |> | No, I'm intent on exposing you as a fraud. > |> > |> Have you succeeded yet? > | > | I believe so. All the evidence of course is circumstantial, but the > | extremely one dimensional nature of it does not permit any other > | conclusion. > > Can I get a citation stating I am a fraud on Such-and-such-a-count? > Also, a solid proof of how you exposed me would be useful. I'd like to > have proof to show prospective employers and such, you know Since you've already stated many times that you wish to avoid irony and troll feeding, I can only summise that you hold that position only when you're out of your depth, which is of course the point I have been making.
From: Madhu on 18 Nov 2009 02:27 * mdj <d967ee81-d923-4659-adb0-ba7ae721a063(a)s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com> : Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:25:13 -0800 (PST): |> |> | No, I'm intent on exposing you as a fraud. |> |> |> |> Have you succeeded yet? |> | |> | I believe so. All the evidence of course is circumstantial, but the |> | extremely one dimensional nature of it does not permit any other |> | conclusion. |> |> Can I get a citation stating I am a fraud on Such-and-such-a-count? |> Also, a solid proof of how you exposed me would be useful. I'd like to |> have proof to show prospective employers and such, you know | | Since you've already stated many times that you wish to avoid irony | and troll feeding, I can only summise that you hold that position only | when you're out of your depth, which is of course the point I have | been making. You're out of depth now? Or can you state clearly on what count of fraud you have succeeded in convicting me of, and what evidence and reasoning you used to arrive at your `proof' -- Madhu
From: Madhu on 18 Nov 2009 02:36 * mdj <8a3f2e56-5748-4113-856f-2cc2703ae113(a)e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com> : Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:22:15 -0800 (PST): | On Nov 18, 5:13 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: |> * mdj <b5eb427a-9e5a-4985-9794-2f63ef989...(a)b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com> : |> Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:05:10 -0800 (PST): |> |> | On Nov 18, 4:37 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: |> | |> |> |> But They do. "Everyone" can see that. |> |> | |> |> | Oh yes, shame on my for being so crooked and taking Ken at his word! |> |> |> |> You really want me to tell you what logical fallacy you are comitting |> |> here dont you? |> | |> | I did not make that (admittedly sarcastic) remark in response to that |> | statement, you deleted text to make it appear that way. |> |> Here is the context reinserted: |> |> * mdj <d0233017-3433-469e-b15e-424950027...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com> : |> Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:05:58 -0800 (PST): |> |> | On Nov 18, 1:57=C2=A0pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: |> |> Why dont you post a few articles on lisp or something and maybe come |> |> back to this thread later? All you are doing is continuing to ``return |> |> each remark with a machine gun burst of no less than than than four |> |> preposterous remarks each just screaming for rebuttal'' (in Ken Tilton's |> |> words observed of Garret's tactics in |> |> <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/f965378a4e2d4abe> ) |> | |> | Since Ken has already posted to this thread and pointed out that is |> | observations of Ron in that context don't apply to me, |> |> They do apply to all your activity on comp.lang.lisp | | No, they don't. It only looks that way to you. Oh. where did you figure that out? |> You really want me to tell you what logical fallacy you are comitting |> here dont you? | | No. I've already convinced myself you're incapable of such. Your | further input on this point is neither requested nor required. Don't worry, I'm not going to tell you, because that would be falling for your trollbait (which is implied in the quoted text) -- Madhu
From: mdj on 18 Nov 2009 02:41
On Nov 18, 5:19 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > |http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/4fa15d1543542987 > > See <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/e18056ac28857be7> > > Or pick any of my responses to you before that. Unless time is now running backwards and nobody told me, I see no reason why your response would predate my statement. |