simulating local lexical variables with symbol macros
in [Lisp]
|
Prev: Mistake in the specification of rotatef ?
Next: [ann] LTK based libraries Runtime Library 3.0 and Gestalt Items 1.1
From: Madhu on 18 Nov 2009 08:38 * Kenneth Tilton <4b03eba4$0$31285$607ed4bc(a)cv.net> : Wrote on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:42:21 -0500: | Madhu wrote: |> Why dont you post a few articles on lisp or something and maybe come |> back to this thread later? All you are doing is continuing to |> ``return each remark with a machine gun burst of no less than than |> than four preposterous remarks each just screaming for rebuttal'' (in |> Ken Tilton's words observed of Garret's tactics in |> <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/f965378a4e2d4abe> |> ) | | "than than than"? Your editor has a stutter. Indeed. Apologies for misquoting you---I notice I yanked this incorrect text without fixing it in multiple places---in my haste to out-troll the troll, but I see I've lost points on sloppy and lack of proofreading. Ideally, I'd have been dictating to a secretary with a British accent of course. -- Madhu
From: Hanne Gudiksen on 18 Nov 2009 09:12 On Nov 18, 11:38 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > Ideally, I'd have been dictating to a secretary with a British accent of > course. I agree. Any secretary worth her salary would lose your drivel somewhere between your uttering it, and us reading it.
From: Madhu on 18 Nov 2009 09:28 * mdj <e95ec41f-a71f-4690-a980-901a1ffa5522(a)z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> : Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:55:46 -0800 (PST): | On Nov 18, 5:48 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: | |> | My use of language is perfectly clear; a point you've complimented |> | me on more than once. Go back and read my posts again. There is |> | nothing to be gained by repeating myself further You know this is rather unfair after you made me repeat myself so many times. |> But posts are perfectly clearl when seen as trollposts, where you are |> inviting me to correct your misunderstandings, inviting me to bicker |> pathologically about the meanings of subjective words and usages, and |> gratuitious insults like calling me a fraud. | | There is an unresolvable incongruity between asking me for further | clarification and your decision to label everything I say as troll. | That being the case, solving that impasse depends completely on you. I | am not going to retract my remarks without refutation, and you are not | going to refute anything on the grounds that it's trollbait. So we | have a stalemate. But this situation you outline has persisted from the start because we have no common ground. <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/58b348c4ed851268> |Others can decide their POV based on the already voluminous extant |material. I was just replying to you. not to others but this shows more of your intent. You have picked up another aspect of Ron's disease. ---- Bury your mistakes in an impenetrable trollfest of verbiage that no one will have the patience to dig through. Troll -- Madhu
From: Madhu on 18 Nov 2009 09:30 * Hanne Gudiksen <ebcc5c4f-46c2-43f5-b2c3-20d6d9327d15(a)x6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> : Wrote on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:12:16 -0800 (PST): |> Ideally, I'd have been dictating to a secretary with a British accent of |> course. | | I agree. Any secretary worth her salary would lose your drivel | somewhere between your uttering it, and us reading it. I believe you are demonstrating a pathological obsessive compulsive disorder which results in a need to have the last word in the thread. Do you think that having the last post somehow makes your position correct? -- Madhu
From: Hanne Gudiksen on 18 Nov 2009 09:47
On Nov 19, 12:28 am, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > * mdj <e95ec41f-a71f-4690-a980-901a1ffa5...(a)z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com> : > Wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:55:46 -0800 (PST): > > | On Nov 18, 5:48 pm, Madhu <enom...(a)meer.net> wrote: > | > |> | My use of language is perfectly clear; a point you've complimented > |> | me on more than once. Go back and read my posts again. There is > |> | nothing to be gained by repeating myself further > > You know this is rather unfair after you made me repeat myself so many > times. Made? Unfair? Grow up. > | There is an unresolvable incongruity between asking me for further > | clarification and your decision to label everything I say as troll. > | That being the case, solving that impasse depends completely on you. I > | am not going to retract my remarks without refutation, and you are not > | going to refute anything on the grounds that it's trollbait. So we > | have a stalemate. > > But this situation you outline has persisted from the start because we > have no common ground. > > <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/58b348c4ed851268> This post is not even early let alone from the start. Fraud. It does however contain brilliant retorts from you such as "Whatever" > |Others can decide their POV based on the already voluminous extant > |material. > > I was just replying to you. not to others but this shows more of your > intent. You have picked up another aspect of Ron's disease. ---- Bury > your mistakes in an impenetrable trollfest of verbiage that no one will > have the patience to dig through. Or so you'd like to think. The majority of readers see this as it unfolds, lying bullshit on your part included. Matt |