the adventure of photography
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: sobriquet on 13 May 2010 02:57 On 13 mei, 07:57, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >[.. babbling ..] You are a nazi cockroach that belongs in jail along with all the rest of the nazi scum that fail to respect human rights.
From: Dänk 110100100 on 13 May 2010 03:11 On May 4, 7:02 am, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > Sociopath. You're a sociopath. > Thief. You're a thief.
From: whisky-dave on 13 May 2010 09:09 "sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c6b16be6-9392-4db6-bd6e-21a0e3a42c57(a)o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > True. Not to share. But I do it anyway since copyright laws primarily > serve corporations > and corporations more or less own the government, so they have been > able to manipulate > the situation to suit their interests. True to some extent but copyright is for everyone. > Hence, I share information freely without respecting spurious > intellectual property claims. You think you're some sort of Robin Hood. > This makes me someone with a blatant disrespect for copyright laws and > I freely acknowledge > this to anyone who points this out. However, when people call me a > thief for doing so (which is a form of demonization, given that, at no > point during copyright infringement is anything being taken away from > anyone), And this is nprobabaly the only think I'm agreeing with here, you might be many other things, but I've never called you a thief. >I respond by demonizing them in turn by calling them a nazi. > I have a very strong conviction that the UDHR grants me the right to > share information freely, Not with copyrighted materail. > just like the UDHR grants me the freedom to > pursue a lifestyle of my preference, provided I don't infringe upon > the freedom of others, Yep and some peoples freedom is to keep their information private and not in the public domain. >even if that involves growing cannabis at home > if those happen to be my favorite flowers. Even Amsterdam has laws regarding this, you should know that. Remmeber cannabis is decriminalised not legal, do you not understand the difference. > The UDHR is intended to protect the interests of individual citizens > like me, when the government fails to do so, because they primarily > act to serve the interests of corporations. It was invented after the > nazi scum in former Nazi Germany set a particularly nasty example of > what can happen when the government blatantly disrespects human > rights. We in the UK have a similar thing which was started somewhat earlier even before the Nazis it's called Bill of Rights 1689. >
From: sobriquet on 13 May 2010 09:30 On 13 mei, 15:09, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >[..babbling..] I'm done with you.. I only argue with people who are able to deal with arguments in a rational fashion, not with manipulative nazi cockroaches who keep coming up with the same bullshit in response to rational arguments. If you follow a course on argumentation, perhaps we could continue this discussion in a rational fashion: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4919006/TTC_VIDEO_-_Argumentation__The_Study_of_Effective_Reasoning_2nd_
From: sobriquet on 13 May 2010 09:30
On 13 mei, 14:56, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >[..babbling..] I'm done with you.. I only argue with people who are able to deal with arguments in a rational fashion, not with manipulative nazi cockroaches who keep coming up with the same bullshit in response to rational arguments. If you follow a course on argumentation, perhaps we could continue this discussion in a rational fashion: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4919006/TTC_VIDEO_-_Argumentation__The_Study_of_Effective_Reasoning_2nd_ |