the adventure of photography
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: sobriquet on 28 May 2010 13:23 On 28 mei, 16:39, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >[.. babbling ..] No time to reply to this drivel. You're a nazi cockroach, that's blatantly obvious by now.
From: Ray Fischer on 29 May 2010 01:58 whisky-dave <whisky-dave(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >"sobriquet" <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> Nobody is claiming that anyone who owns a bitstring or other >> information is forced to disclose it, even though it belongs to the >> public domain. > >Why are you claiming it belongs in the public domain. Because he wants it and doesn't want to pay for it. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: Ray Fischer on 29 May 2010 01:59 sobriquet <dohduhdah(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On 26 mei, 14:26, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:a10305a2-547b-4de0-8177-800e1428060d(a)40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> >> >> > On 25 mei, 12:13, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:2a737fbb-73bf-42c1-97e9-94e692956309(a)i31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> > On 24 mei, 16:26, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> >> >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >>news:c063ec8c-240e-4015-b873-1fbcb0c48512(a)k31g2000vbu.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >> > On 19 mei, 15:01, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: >> >> >> >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> >> >> > Nobody is claiming that anyone who owns a bitstring or other >> >> >> > information is forced to disclose it, even though it belongs to the >> >> >> > public domain. >> >> >> >> Why are you claiming it belongs in the public domain. >> >> >> > Because that's the only way you can define the public domain in a >> >> > sensible way. >> >> >> No it's not, no more than you'd describe a public carpark >> >> as somewhere you put you car so others can use it. >> >> Why can't ther be private domains like yuor bathroom which >> >> isn;t open to the public. >> >> > Because your money will also no longer be your private property if you >> > deliberately chose >> > to scatter it out on the streets wherever you go. >> >> And where do you see software companies scattering their CDs/DVDs >> on the streets ? > >Usually their stuff is available for free on bt sites like >thepiratebay and similar p2p networks. Just as you can buy other stolen goods. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: sobriquet on 29 May 2010 06:52 On 29 May, 07:59, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > sobriquet <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On 26 mei, 14:26, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > >>news:a10305a2-547b-4de0-8177-800e1428060d(a)40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com.... > > >> > On 25 mei, 12:13, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >> >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > >> >>news:2a737fbb-73bf-42c1-97e9-94e692956309(a)i31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com... > > >> >> > On 24 mei, 16:26, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >> >> >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > >> >> >>news:c063ec8c-240e-4015-b873-1fbcb0c48512(a)k31g2000vbu.googlegroups.com... > > >> >> >> > On 19 mei, 15:01, "whisky-dave" <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >> >> >> >> "sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > >> >> >> > Nobody is claiming that anyone who owns a bitstring or other > >> >> >> > information is forced to disclose it, even though it belongs to the > >> >> >> > public domain. > > >> >> >> Why are you claiming it belongs in the public domain. > > >> >> > Because that's the only way you can define the public domain in a > >> >> > sensible way. > > >> >> No it's not, no more than you'd describe a public carpark > >> >> as somewhere you put you car so others can use it. > >> >> Why can't ther be private domains like yuor bathroom which > >> >> isn;t open to the public. > > >> > Because your money will also no longer be your private property if you > >> > deliberately chose > >> > to scatter it out on the streets wherever you go. > > >> And where do you see software companies scattering their CDs/DVDs > >> on the streets ? > > >Usually their stuff is available for free on bt sites like > >thepiratebay and similar p2p networks. > > Just as you can buy other stolen goods. > > -- > Ray Fischer > rfisc...(a)sonic.net Stolen goods get taken away from someone.. copyright infringing files that are shared online were never taken away from anyone.
From: sobriquet on 29 May 2010 06:53
On 29 May, 07:58, rfisc...(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: > whisky-dave <whisky-d...(a)final.front.ear> wrote: > >"sobriquet" <dohduh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > >> Nobody is claiming that anyone who owns a bitstring or other > >> information is forced to disclose it, even though it belongs to the > >> public domain. > > >Why are you claiming it belongs in the public domain. > > Because he wants it and doesn't want to pay for it. > > -- > Ray Fischer > rfisc...(a)sonic.net Because there is no way to define the public domain in a sensible way otherwise. You can't distinguish between bitstrings that are private intellectual property and bitstrings that belong to the public domain in a sensible way. |