torrent and other P2P
in [Computers]
|
Prev: How do I turn my mouse off?
Next: Centrelink error...
From: Rod Speed on 10 Apr 2010 07:00 Craig wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>> Wouldn't the redirector have to pass on all traffic to and from the P2P user? >> Thats one way of doing it. >>> If so, are you going to get good speeds from a free redirector? >> Yep. >>> Why would they give you so much bandwidth for free? >> Because they get it at no marginal cost themselves. > That doesn't really answer the question. Corse it does. > Why would they give it away for free? For the same reason Linux is given away for free. For the same reason I give free advice on technical issues. Etc etc etc.
From: Craig on 11 Apr 2010 00:43 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:82d0rfFfbkU1(a)mid.individual.net... > >>> Because no one gets costs awarded against them in that situation. > >> They might get a few K in costs just to be made an example of. > > Nope, it doesnt work like that with an individual downloader in this > country. > >>> And they couldnt get their costs out of me even if they were awarded by >>> the court anyway. > >> Are you going to stop the Sheriff taking your assets away? > > Nope, just dont have any assets in my name so there is nothing to take. What about your PC?
From: Rod Speed on 11 Apr 2010 02:08 Craig wrote > Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote >>>> Because no one gets costs awarded against them in that situation. >>> They might get a few K in costs just to be made an example of. >> Nope, it doesnt work like that with an individual downloader in this country. >>>> And they couldnt get their costs out of me even if they were awarded by the court anyway. >>> Are you going to stop the Sheriff taking your assets away? >> Nope, just dont have any assets in my name so there is nothing to take. > What about your PC? It wouldnt be in my name either.
From: Craig on 11 Apr 2010 03:19 "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:82d7b2Fd7eU1(a)mid.individual.net... > Craig wrote >> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote > >>>>> Because no one gets costs awarded against them in that situation. > >>>> They might get a few K in costs just to be made an example of. > >>> Nope, it doesnt work like that with an individual downloader in this >>> country. > >>>>> And they couldnt get their costs out of me even if they were awarded >>>>> by the court anyway. > >>>> Are you going to stop the Sheriff taking your assets away? > >>> Nope, just dont have any assets in my name so there is nothing to take. > >> What about your PC? > > It wouldnt be in my name either. If your computer and your internet connection are in another name then that name will be liable.
From: terryc on 11 Apr 2010 03:45
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:31:59 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: > terryc wrote >> Rod Speed wrote >>> Craig wrote >>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote > >>>>>>> Its only that situation which makes a civil action against an >>>>>>> individual downloader viable. > >>>>>> Damages could still be established. > >>>>> Nope, because they cant prove that the individual would have paid >>>>> for a legal copy. > >> Civil claims in NSw are decided on the balance of probabilities. > > DAMAGES arent. There are no imaginary losses. They all have to be real and quantifiable. > >> if the assessor decides that you acting as an uploader > > We are discussing in this sub thread someone who JUST downloads. Typical Roddles, trys to change the discussion to something else. |