From: Sjoerd Hiemstra on 1 Mar 2010 12:10 Francesco Pietra: > Unfortunately, for dealing with most editors of scientific journals, > and for personal use of the scientific literature, either as author or > referee, neither the readers you mention, nor any one other I know > except acroread, are enough. You can use Adobe Reader for Linux from www.adobe.com. Run the .bin file and follow instructions. By installing it into /usr/local, you stay out of reach of the package manager. There is an uninstall option though. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100301174819.94572ed0.shiems(a)kpnmail.nl
From: Florian Weimer on 1 Mar 2010 15:20 * Francesco Pietra: > Unfortunately, for dealing with most editors of scientific journals, > and for personal use of the scientific literature, either as author or > referee, neither the readers you mention, nor any one other I know > except acroread, are enough. Because of these problems (which are not > unique to acroread), most my colleagues have turned to either > Microsoft or Apple for the desktop. What problems exactly? The usual criticism of alternatives for Adobe's Reader revolves around PDF forms, which are still problematic to fill out. Embedded Flash and Javascript are obviously problematic, too, but it seems that no one misses *that*. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87tysz3iq1.fsf(a)mid.deneb.enyo.de
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Asus WL-167g (rt2500usb) DHCP fails Next: Fresh Debian Install w/o Exim? |