what about acroread in squeeze i386?
in [Debian]
|
From: Francesco Pietra on 28 Feb 2010 13:50 What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive and more energy demanding 64-bit machines with lenny to have such packages. Curious about the reason why squeeze has no efficient pdf reader. thanks francesco pietra -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b87c422a1002281030k46e3214tf012b696a121eecf(a)mail.gmail.com
From: Vincenzo Tibullo on 28 Feb 2010 14:00 They moved to non-free, see http://debian-multimedia.org/. -- enzotib 2010/2/28 Francesco Pietra <chiendarret(a)gmail.com>: > What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain > a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why > acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on > debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive > and more energy demanding 64-bit machines with lenny to have such > packages. Curious about the reason why squeeze has no efficient pdf > reader. > > thanks > francesco pietra > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-request(a)lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/b87c422a1002281030k46e3214tf012b696a121eecf(a)mail.gmail.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/756bdd601002281052n56c36fd4pecaf8775719a0c28(a)mail.gmail.com
From: Tyler Smith on 28 Feb 2010 14:30 Francesco Pietra <chiendarret(a)gmail.com> writes: > What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain > a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why > acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on > debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive > and more energy demanding 64-bit machines with lenny to have such > packages. Curious about the reason why squeeze has no efficient pdf > reader. > Out of curiosity, what is particularly inefficient about Okular or Evince? Tyler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mxytb1um.fsf(a)eku238261.eku.edu
From: "Wayne linuxtwo on 28 Feb 2010 14:50 Francesco Pietra wrote: > What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain > a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why > acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on > debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive > and more energy demanding 64-bit machines with lenny to have such > packages. Curious about the reason why squeeze has no efficient pdf > reader. I am running 386 acroread on a 686 squeeze box with the only problem being the print option for Odd an Even pages works backwards. I have not been able to use acroread on my 64bit box for months now. Same goes for cups, OK on 386, none on 64 bit. Both running squeeze. Wayne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4B8AC8BD.1010204(a)gmail.com
From: Jameson Rollins on 28 Feb 2010 18:50 On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:30:32 +0100, Francesco Pietra <chiendarret(a)gmail.com> wrote: > What about acroread in squeeze i386? The only reason here to maintain > a computer with squeeze is to provide a needed tool to scientists. Why > acroread acroread-mozilla acroread-plugins can't be found on > debian-multimedia i386 squeeze/testing? We have to run more expensive > and more energy demanding 64-bit machines with lenny to have such > packages. Curious about the reason why squeeze has no efficient pdf > reader. There are plenty of very good free pdf readers in squeeze: evince xpdf konqueror jamie.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Asus WL-167g (rt2500usb) DHCP fails Next: Fresh Debian Install w/o Exim? |