From: Alex P. on

"Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:5n7sv5tumujj5jkts64098t8hgq5aq0uuv(a)4ax.com...
> On Wed, 26 May 2010 22:00:53 GMT, habshi(a)anony.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>photo on
>>
>>
>>http://www.ecofriend.org/entry/mira-ev-shatters-previous-record-by-running-more-than-1000km-on-a-single-charge/
>>Cant find youtube video
>>
>>Amazing stuff! Now wind and solar energy will supply all our transport
>>needs as well.
>
> Calculate!
> Battery + motor efficiency,
> (how much of the fed charge do you get back as drive)
> and then,
> how many nuclear power plants will be needed to charge
> all electric vehicles.

It takes about 15 to 20 kWh to power an average user scale electric/plugin
vehicle for about 100 km. In the US, where the distance travelled for
personal transportation is more than 3 billions miles per year,
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/10febtvt/figure1.cfm
they will need more than 900 TWh/year of electricity, or the total nuclear
electricity US production. Pratically, personal electric vehicles are only
*one possible* strategy to electrificate transportation (both of goods and
people) and home heating/conditioning with efficient electric pumps



From: bert on
On May 28, 11:16 am, "Alex P." <al...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> "Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> ha scritto nel messaggionews:5n7sv5tumujj5jkts64098t8hgq5aq0uuv(a)4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 26 May 2010 22:00:53 GMT, hab...(a)anony.net wrote:
>
> >>photo on
>
> >>http://www.ecofriend.org/entry/mira-ev-shatters-previous-record-by-ru....
> >>Cant find youtube video
>
> >>Amazing stuff! Now wind and solar energy will supply all our transport
> >>needs as well.
>
> > Calculate!
> > Battery + motor efficiency,
> > (how much of the fed charge do you get back as drive)
> > and then,
> > how many nuclear power plants will be needed to charge
> > all electric vehicles.
>
> It takes about 15 to 20 kWh to power an average user scale electric/plugin
> vehicle for about 100 km. In the US, where the distance travelled for
> personal transportation is more than 3 billions miles per year,http://www..fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/10febtvt/figure1.cfm
> they will need more than 900 TWh/year of electricity, or the total nuclear
> electricity US production. Pratically, personal electric vehicles are only
> *one possible* strategy to electrificate transportation (both of goods and
> people) and home heating/conditioning with efficient electric pumps- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

We need "inerttia cars" They run off very heavy flywheel. Chicago had
a bus that ran stop and go for 50 miles on one pull of the string.
TreBert
From: Bert Hyman on
In
news:63fa41ae-f1a6-48d7-9f68-84f4b4c17281(a)k31g2000vbu.googlegroups.com
bert <herbertglazier79(a)msn.com> wrote:

>
> We need "inerttia cars" They run off very heavy flywheel. Chicago had
> a bus that ran stop and go for 50 miles on one pull of the string.

So, where does the energy to pull that string come from?

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN bert(a)iphouse.com
From: Alex P. on

"Bert Hyman" <bert(a)iphouse.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:Xns9D866F1548AC5VeebleFetzer(a)216.250.188.140...
> In
> news:63fa41ae-f1a6-48d7-9f68-84f4b4c17281(a)k31g2000vbu.googlegroups.com
> bert <herbertglazier79(a)msn.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> We need "inerttia cars" They run off very heavy flywheel. Chicago had
>> a bus that ran stop and go for 50 miles on one pull of the string.
>
> So, where does the energy to pull that string come from?


I guess a mix of nuclear (including in the near future thorium reactors,
read a post of some days ago), renewables and natural gas plants, in this
order (nuclear and reliable renewables like geothermal and biomass for the
base load, intermittent renewables when and where available, hydro and
eventually gas plants for the peaks, including heat pumps demand)

But I think that the question is badly posted, even with no nuclear or
renewables, you gain a double efficiency using an electricic vehicle rather
that a petrol engine and an efficient heat pums (instead a gas boiler), even
if all the kWh came from a quite efficient natural gas CC plant


From: Androcles on

"Alex P." <alexp(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:A7RLn.174111$9f6.292439(a)twister1.libero.it...
|
| "Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> ha scritto nel messaggio
| news:5n7sv5tumujj5jkts64098t8hgq5aq0uuv(a)4ax.com...
| > On Wed, 26 May 2010 22:00:53 GMT, habshi(a)anony.net wrote:
| >
| >>
| >>
| >>photo on
| >>
| >>
|
>>http://www.ecofriend.org/entry/mira-ev-shatters-previous-record-by-running-more-than-1000km-on-a-single-charge/
| >>Cant find youtube video
| >>
| >>Amazing stuff! Now wind and solar energy will supply all our transport
| >>needs as well.
| >
| > Calculate!
| > Battery + motor efficiency,
| > (how much of the fed charge do you get back as drive)
| > and then,
| > how many nuclear power plants will be needed to charge
| > all electric vehicles.
|
| It takes about 15 to 20 kWh to power an average user scale electric/plugin
| vehicle for about 100 km. In the US, where the distance travelled for
| personal transportation is more than 3 billions miles per year,
| http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/10febtvt/figure1.cfm
| they will need more than 900 TWh/year of electricity, or the total nuclear
| electricity US production. Pratically, personal electric vehicles are only
| *one possible* strategy to electrificate transportation (both of goods and
| people) and home heating/conditioning with efficient electric pumps
|
So doubling the existing number of nuclear power stations would do it?
Seems like a good idea...