911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: knews4u2chew on 5 Oct 2009 13:28 On Oct 5, 6:51 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <f8c12e60-843f-47e3-b46a-b135a89da...(a)j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, > > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Oct 4, 4:07=A0pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> In article <e8591c31-2930-460b-b10e-203db9e19...(a)q40g2000prh.googlegroups= > >.com>, > > >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >On Oct 4, 2:46=3DA0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> >> In article <63ec6e4d-819a-4c83-9c1d-80479509c...(a)b25g2000prb.googlegro= > >ups=3D > >> >.com>, > > >> >> =3DA0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >On Oct 3, 2:04=3D3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Oct 3, 1:46=3D3DA0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > >> >> >> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.googlegrou= > >ps.=3D > >> >com=3D3D > >> >> >, > >> >> >> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >> >> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.google= > >gro=3D > >> >ups=3D3D > >> >> >.com, > >> >> >> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >> >> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> >> >> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000prg.goog= > >leg=3D > >> >rou=3D3D > >> >> >ps.com, > >> >> >> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >> >> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> >> >> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.goo= > >gle=3D > >> >gro=3D3D > >> >> >ups.com, > >> >> >> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> In article > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.googleg= > >rou=3D > >> >ps.=3D3D > >> >> >com>, > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=3D3D3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> = > >wrote=3D > >> >: > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=3D3D3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.or= > >g> > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote: > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3DA0 And even there had been, it couldn't have= > > melt=3D > >> >ed > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel, > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> =3D3D3DA0 We know the fires didn't melt the steel. On= > >ly > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it. > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible for > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other than > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000. > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar? > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pi= > >le > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> at WTC. > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand. > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away? > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molten" > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING. > > >> >> >> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it was > >> >> >> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled > >> >> >> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten steel. > > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away because = > >it > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED. > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since the > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> evidence "we" > >> >> >> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute." > > >> >> >> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's your cla= > >im > >> >> >> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of TH= > >AT > >> >> >> > >>>>>> claim? > > >> >> >> > >>>>> Where is the building? > > >> >> >> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world. > > >> >> >> > >>> Liar. > >> >> >> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard. > > >> >> >> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world, and > >> >> >> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had access. > > >> >> >> > >>>>> Who has it? > > >> >> >> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever? > > >> >> >> > >>> No answer noted. > > >> >> >> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted. > > >> >> >> > >>>>> Did it disappear? > > >> >> >> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who wanted = > >to > >> >> >> > >>>> see it. > > >> >> >> > >>> Liar. > > >> >> >> > >> Prove it. > > >> >> >> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored. > > >> >> >> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly included > >> >> >> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion. > > >> >> >> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it. > > >> >> >> > >> Prove it. > > >> >> >> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never existed= > >? > > >> >> >> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist. > > >> >> >> > >>> Liar. > >> >> >> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-= > >1.p=3D > >> >df > > >> >> >> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just > >> >> >> > >> fantasies and arm waving. > > >> >> >> > >>>>> How convenient. > > >> >> >> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient? > > >> >> >> > >>> The truth is the truth. > > >> >> >> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing. > > >> >> >> > >>> You are in denial. > > >> >> >> > >> Of fantasies. > > >> >> >> > > Your Mossad tactics. > >> >> >> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=3D3D3Den&rlz=3D3D3D1G1GGLQ_ENUS3= > >45&q=3D3D=3D > >> >3Ddisinfo=3D3D > >> >> >+tact... > > >> >> >> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics. =3D3DA0got it. > > >> >> >> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he is. It > >> >> >> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes. > > >> >> >http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm > > >> >> >Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is > >> >> >owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact and > >> >> >should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way. > > >> >> What does this have to do with the eyewitnesses, possibly as many as > >> >> 100,000 that saw to some aspect of 9/11 and none of whom have joined > >> >> any "truth" movement. > > >> >"None?" > >> >Proof? > > >> Name one. > > >> -- > >> Al Dykes > > >You made the claim. > >You back it up. > Liar snippage noted. > Here is the list of all the eyewitnesses I know of that have joined the Truth Movement. > > 1. > 2. > 3. > > You are welcome to add to it. Names, please. Not URLS. > > -- > Al Dykes So, you live under a Zionist rock. What else is new? You are nothing. You provide nothing but distractions. You snip the links provided and arm wave. Who do you work for? Do you live in america? Are you a citizen? How many other nyms do you use? How long have you been working as a disinfo agent? http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
From: AllYou! on 5 Oct 2009 13:30 In news:7107fa1d-1794-4a70-b6cd-b40a8f531265(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Oct 5, 9:06 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> Innews:hacu2q$6kh$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >> >>> Daniel wrote: >>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> >>>>> And even there had been, it couldn't have melted the steel, >> >>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. >> >>> We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only thermite >>> explains it. >> >> There was no melted steel. There is only some anecdotal, second >> hand reports of some amount of molten metal. No molten steel. >> >> (Insert links here that you mean to imply is evidence of your >> claim, but which is only actually proof of mine) >> ------------> >> >>>> Get back to us once >>>> you have some credible sources to back up your claims. >> >>> Since you agree that the fires couldn't have produced >>> the molten metal, what claim are you disputing? >> >> That there was any molten steel. >> >>> Here are two of our 9-11 rescue heroes who observed molten >>> metal "flowing like lava - like a "foundry" >> >> Which is not any kind of evidence that it was molten steel. It >> could've been any amount of soft metals and other low-melting >> point substances that were in great abundance in a fully >> occupied sky scraper. >> >> And why have you never been able to produce even one example of >> a building destroyed by controlled demolition to have ever >> resulted in pools of molten steel flowing like lava in a >> foundry. > > http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516# > Watch. > Listen. > Then come back and lie and deny some more. 1) Instead of answereing a question directly, post a link to some whako site as though it's an answer to the question, when it doesn't even begin to be on point.
From: AllYou! on 5 Oct 2009 13:33 In news:dcd3ea47-80a4-4afe-8737-c2027e343736(a)u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Oct 5, 9:49 am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Oct 5, 8:11 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> >>> AllYou! wrote: >>>> Innews:h9b77b$740$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >>>> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >>>>> Please explain the violent 75 foot explosions seen >>>>> coming out the sides of both towers hundred of feet >>>>> below the "collapse" zone. >>>> Even a school kid who's ever stomped his foot really fast >>>> onto an empty carton of milk knows the answer to that one. >> >>> But apparently (and predictably) you can't... <chuckle> >> >>> Please explain the violent 75 foot explosions seen >>> coming out the sides of both towers hundred of feet >>> below the "collapse" zone. >> >> Uh, there were none. >> >> Are you talking about the puffs of compressed air being pushed >> out of broken windows? >> > And how did the windows break 30 floors away? > Don't tell me "the building was so air tight that the compressed > air pulverized concrete and ejected it from the building." > That would be another of your lies. > >> Tell us why you "think" those are explosions, Hankie. Make it >> good. >> > Because eyewitnesses describe such. They described how "it sounded like" much in the way that people say that the paths of tornadoes "look like" a nuclear bomb went off. IS that "hard evidence" that a nuclear bomb went off?
From: Al Dykes on 5 Oct 2009 13:36 In article <615a04f4-fbed-48ba-bf79-e3f9d1b2126c(a)t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 5, 9:11=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <qdGdna6miLDjhFfXnZ2dnUVZ_tGdn...(a)posted.choiceonecommunicatio= >ns>, >> >> >> >> AllYou! <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >Innews:hacu2q$6kh$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, >> >Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: >> >> Daniel wrote: >> >>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: >> >> >>>> =A0 And even there had been, it couldn't have melted the steel, >> >> >>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. >> >> >> =A0We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only thermite >> >> explains it. >> >> >There was no melted steel. =A0There is only some anecdotal, second >> >hand reports of some amount of molten metal. =A0No molten steel. >> >> >(Insert links here that you mean to imply is evidence of your claim, >> >but which is only actually proof of mine) >> >------------> >> >> >>> Get back to us once >> >>> you have some credible sources to back up your claims. >> >> >> =A0Since you agree that the fires couldn't have produced >> >> the molten metal, what claim are you disputing? >> >> >That there was any molten steel. >> >> >> =A0Here are two of our 9-11 rescue heroes who observed molten metal >> >> "flowing like lava - like a "foundry" >> >> >Which is not any kind of evidence that it was molten steel. =A0It >> >could've been any amount of soft metals and other low-melting point >> >substances that were in great abundance in a fully occupied sky >> >scraper. >> >> The "foundry" quote is from a few seconds of video of firemen speaking >> about WTC. =A0It's been edited out of something and I have been unable >> to identify the source. The firemen are not identified. >> >> Nowhere in the video is "I saw" spoken. The editing is so tight that >> the words that preceded "like a foundry" could very well be "i was told >> some bullshit about ...".. >> >> -- >> Al Dykes > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DKglmMbprfkw&feature=3Drelated >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DafZaK8zVbUw&feature=3Drelated >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D_wVLeKwSkXA >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DX-99CLdHWCc&feature=3Drelated >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCx33GuVsUtE&feature=3Drelated >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DIrrJCa1haaY&feature=3Drelated >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D3Ogrupgt4mI&feature=3Drelated Name one person that says something equal to "I saw molten steel on the pile". -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: knews4u2chew on 5 Oct 2009 13:36
On Oct 5, 10:30 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > Innews:7107fa1d-1794-4a70-b6cd-b40a8f531265(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com, > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > > > > On Oct 5, 9:06 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> Innews:hacu2q$6kh$1(a)ruby.cit.cornell.edu, > >> Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused: > > >>> Daniel wrote: > >>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > >>>>> And even there had been, it couldn't have melted the steel, > > >>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. > > >>> We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only thermite > >>> explains it. > > >> There was no melted steel. There is only some anecdotal, second > >> hand reports of some amount of molten metal. No molten steel. > > >> (Insert links here that you mean to imply is evidence of your > >> claim, but which is only actually proof of mine) > >> ------------> > > >>>> Get back to us once > >>>> you have some credible sources to back up your claims. > > >>> Since you agree that the fires couldn't have produced > >>> the molten metal, what claim are you disputing? > > >> That there was any molten steel. > > >>> Here are two of our 9-11 rescue heroes who observed molten > >>> metal "flowing like lava - like a "foundry" > > >> Which is not any kind of evidence that it was molten steel. It > >> could've been any amount of soft metals and other low-melting > >> point substances that were in great abundance in a fully > >> occupied sky scraper. > > >> And why have you never been able to produce even one example of > >> a building destroyed by controlled demolition to have ever > >> resulted in pools of molten steel flowing like lava in a > >> foundry. > > >http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6498070204870579516# > > Watch. > > Listen. > > Then come back and lie and deny some more. > > 1) Instead of answereing a question directly, post a link to some > whako site as though it's an answer to the question, when it doesn't > even begin to be on point. And your modus operandi continues: http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html |