From: knews4u2chew on
On Oct 3, 3:06 pm, pv+use...(a)pobox.com (PV) wrote:
> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com writes:
> >Where is the building?
>
> It was destroyed, fucknugget.
>
So just how does a steel framed building fall straight down through
it's most resistant structure while being turned into micron sized
particles also containing iron spheres that could only be created by
incendiaries?
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS345&=&q=wtc+dust+thermite&aq=0&oq=wtc+dust&aqi=g1g-m9

From: knews4u2chew on
On Oct 3, 2:04 pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 3, 1:46 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com,
> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>
> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.googlegroups..com,
> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>
> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000prg.googlegroups.com,
> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>
> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.googlegroups.com,
> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>
> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> In article
> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=A0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=A0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =A0 And even there had been, it couldn't have melted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> =A0 We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only
> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible for
> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other than
> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar?
>
> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pile
> > >>>>>>>> at WTC.
> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand.
>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away?
> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molten"
> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING.
>
> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it was
> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled
> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten steel.
>
> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away because it
> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED.
> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since the
> > >>>>>>> evidence "we"
> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute."
>
> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's your claim
> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of THAT
> > >>>>>> claim?
>
> > >>>>> Where is the building?
>
> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world.
>
> > >>> Liar.
> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard.
>
> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world, and
> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had access.
>
> > >>>>> Who has it?
>
> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever?
>
> > >>> No answer noted.
>
> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted.
>
> > >>>>> Did it disappear?
>
> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who wanted to
> > >>>> see it.
>
> > >>> Liar.
>
> > >> Prove it.
>
> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored.
>
> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly included
> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion.
>
> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it.
>
> > >> Prove it.
>
> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never existed?
>
> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist.
>
> > >>> Liar.
> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf
>
> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just
> > >> fantasies and arm waving.
>
> > >>>>> How convenient.
>
> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient?
>
> > >>> The truth is the truth.
>
> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing.
>
> > >>> You are in denial.
>
> > >> Of fantasies.
>
> > > Your Mossad tactics.
> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS345&q=disinfo+tact...
>
> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics.  got it.
>
> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he is. It
> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes.

http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm

Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is
owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact and
should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way.

Zionist Jews control nearly all of the U.S. mass media: television and
radio networks, major newspapers, book publishers and leading book
stores, and the big film studios and chains of movie theatres.

They have taken control of the media for one reason - to manipulate
public opinion by controlling the message. It is the same with media
as with pipelines: He who owns the pipeline controls the product.

Many of the Jewish media moguls are members of the secret organization
of Freemasons, the International Order of B'nai B'rith. Philip Morris
Klutznick, the man who made Obama president, was the international
president of B'nai B'rith. The Sulzberger family who owns the New York
Times was one of the founding families of Lodge No. 1 of the B'nai
B'rith, which was started in New York City in 1843. It is through this
secret society, which is closed to all non-Jews, that the media moguls
and Jewish financiers are able to conspire against the American people
while living among them.

The B'nai B'rith also started the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the
early 1900s. The ADL is an organization that protects the Jewish
criminal network by attacking those who expose their crimes.
The ADL has infiltrated police departments across the United States.
The B'nai B'rith also runs Hillel, an organization for promoting the
Zionist agenda at every college campus in the United States. Through
their organizations like the ADL and Hillel, the secretive Elders of
Zion of the B'nai B'rith are able to push their agenda into every
community and college campus in America. The Protocols of the Elders
of Zion is certainly not a "hoary fake", and is most likely the
protocols from a meeting of the leaders of the B'nai B'rith.
From: Al Dykes on
In article <80fce413-8028-4143-b8bc-2381cf3e8068(a)b3g2000pre.googlegroups.com>,
<knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 3, 3:06=A0pm, pv+use...(a)pobox.com (PV) wrote:
>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com writes:
>> >Where is the building?
>>
>> It was destroyed, fucknugget.
>>
>So just how does a steel framed building fall straight down through
>it's most resistant structure while being turned into micron sized
>particles also containing iron spheres that could only be created by
>incendiaries?

Becuase your understanding of what really happened is really wrong.

You've been lied to by people that use the word "truth" much too much.




--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

From: Al Dykes on
In article <63ec6e4d-819a-4c83-9c1d-80479509c529(a)b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
<knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 3, 2:04=A0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 1:46=A0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com=
>,
>> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.googlegroups=
>.com,
>> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000prg.googlegrou=
>ps.com,
>> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.googlegro=
>ups.com,
>> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>> In article
>> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.googlegroups.=
>com>,
>>
>> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =3DA0 And even there had been, it couldn't have melted
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to.
>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> =3DA0 We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it.
>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible for
>> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other than
>> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000.
>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar?
>>
>> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pile
>> > >>>>>>>> at WTC.
>> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand.
>>
>> > >>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away?
>> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molten"
>> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING.
>>
>> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it was
>> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled
>> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten steel.
>>
>> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away because it
>> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED.
>> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since the
>> > >>>>>>> evidence "we"
>> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute."
>>
>> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's your claim
>> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of THAT
>> > >>>>>> claim?
>>
>> > >>>>> Where is the building?
>>
>> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world.
>>
>> > >>> Liar.
>> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard.
>>
>> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world, and
>> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had access.
>>
>> > >>>>> Who has it?
>>
>> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever?
>>
>> > >>> No answer noted.
>>
>> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted.
>>
>> > >>>>> Did it disappear?
>>
>> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who wanted to
>> > >>>> see it.
>>
>> > >>> Liar.
>>
>> > >> Prove it.
>>
>> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored.
>>
>> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly included
>> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion.
>>
>> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it.
>>
>> > >> Prove it.
>>
>> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never existed?
>>
>> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist.
>>
>> > >>> Liar.
>> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf
>>
>> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just
>> > >> fantasies and arm waving.
>>
>> > >>>>> How convenient.
>>
>> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient?
>>
>> > >>> The truth is the truth.
>>
>> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing.
>>
>> > >>> You are in denial.
>>
>> > >> Of fantasies.
>>
>> > > Your Mossad tactics.
>> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&rlz=3D1G1GGLQ_ENUS345&q=3Ddisinfo=
>+tact...
>>
>> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics. =A0got it.
>>
>> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he is. It
>> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes.
>
>http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm
>
>Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is
>owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact and
>should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way.
>


None of which has anything to do with the fact that all the
eyewitnesses and a massive amount of evidence shows that 19 Islamist
Arabs hijacked 4 airplanes and crashed them into 3 buildings killing
3,000 people.


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

From: Al Dykes on
In article <63ec6e4d-819a-4c83-9c1d-80479509c529(a)b25g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
<knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 3, 2:04=A0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 3, 1:46=A0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com=
>,
>> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.googlegroups=
>.com,
>> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000prg.googlegrou=
>ps.com,
>> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
>> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.googlegro=
>ups.com,
>> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused:
>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>> In article
>> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.googlegroups.=
>com>,
>>
>> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =3DA0 And even there had been, it couldn't have melted
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to.
>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> =3DA0 We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it.
>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible for
>> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other than
>> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000.
>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar?
>>
>> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pile
>> > >>>>>>>> at WTC.
>> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand.
>>
>> > >>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away?
>> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molten"
>> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING.
>>
>> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it was
>> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled
>> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten steel.
>>
>> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away because it
>> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED.
>> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since the
>> > >>>>>>> evidence "we"
>> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute."
>>
>> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's your claim
>> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of THAT
>> > >>>>>> claim?
>>
>> > >>>>> Where is the building?
>>
>> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world.
>>
>> > >>> Liar.
>> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard.
>>
>> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world, and
>> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had access.
>>
>> > >>>>> Who has it?
>>
>> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever?
>>
>> > >>> No answer noted.
>>
>> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted.
>>
>> > >>>>> Did it disappear?
>>
>> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who wanted to
>> > >>>> see it.
>>
>> > >>> Liar.
>>
>> > >> Prove it.
>>
>> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored.
>>
>> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly included
>> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion.
>>
>> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it.
>>
>> > >> Prove it.
>>
>> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never existed?
>>
>> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist.
>>
>> > >>> Liar.
>> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf
>>
>> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just
>> > >> fantasies and arm waving.
>>
>> > >>>>> How convenient.
>>
>> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient?
>>
>> > >>> The truth is the truth.
>>
>> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing.
>>
>> > >>> You are in denial.
>>
>> > >> Of fantasies.
>>
>> > > Your Mossad tactics.
>> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&rlz=3D1G1GGLQ_ENUS345&q=3Ddisinfo=
>+tact...
>>
>> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics. =A0got it.
>>
>> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he is. It
>> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes.
>
>http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm
>
>Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is
>owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact and
>should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way.


What does this have to do with the eyewitnesses, possibly as many as
100,000 that saw to some aspect of 9/11 and none of whom have joined
any "truth" movement.

I'm one of those eyewitnesses.



--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail