911 and the Demo Truth
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Intermediate Accounting 12th and 13th edition Kieso Weygandt
Next: JSH: Back to conic section parameterization result
From: AllYou! on 4 Oct 2009 12:02 In news:80fce413-8028-4143-b8bc-2381cf3e8068(a)b3g2000pre.googlegroups.com, knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> mused: > On Oct 3, 3:06 pm, pv+use...(a)pobox.com (PV) wrote: >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com writes: >>> Where is the building? >> >> It was destroyed, fucknugget. >> > So just how does a steel framed building fall straight down > through > it's most resistant structure while being turned into micron > sized > particles also containing iron spheres that could only be > created by > incendiaries? Fifteen floors of steel structure falling through 50 to 60 feet has enough of an impact effect so as to destroy everything beneath it. As to everything after the "while", all of that is just a lie on your part.
From: knews4u2chew on 4 Oct 2009 13:59 On Oct 4, 2:40 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <80fce413-8028-4143-b8bc-2381cf3e8...(a)b3g2000pre.googlegroups.com>, > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Oct 3, 3:06=A0pm, pv+use...(a)pobox.com (PV) wrote: > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com writes: > >> >Where is the building? > > >> It was destroyed, fucknugget. > > >So just how does a steel framed building fall straight down through > >it's most resistant structure while being turned into micron sized > >particles also containing iron spheres that could only be created by > >incendiaries? > > Becuase your understanding of what really happened is really wrong. > http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html 9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect > You've been lied to by people that use the word "truth" much too much. > > -- > Al Dykes http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html 3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.
From: Al Dykes on 4 Oct 2009 14:36 In article <9cdc821d-b24a-4947-af2d-98d60ad39cfe(a)h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 4, 2:40=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <80fce413-8028-4143-b8bc-2381cf3e8...(a)b3g2000pre.googlegroups.= >com>, >> >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >On Oct 3, 3:06=3DA0pm, pv+use...(a)pobox.com (PV) wrote: >> >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com writes: >> >> >Where is the building? >> >> >> It was destroyed, fucknugget. >> >> >So just how does a steel framed building fall straight down through >> >it's most resistant structure while being turned into micron sized >> >particles also containing iron spheres that could only be created by >> >incendiaries? >> >> Becuase your understanding of what really happened is really wrong. >> >http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html >9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, You have yet to show any evidence for anything like molten steel on the pile. You have yet to name anyone thats says anything like "I saw molten steel". -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail
From: knews4u2chew on 4 Oct 2009 16:27 On Oct 4, 2:46 am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > In article <63ec6e4d-819a-4c83-9c1d-80479509c...(a)b25g2000prb.googlegroups..com>, > > > > <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >On Oct 3, 2:04=A0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 3, 1:46=A0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > > >> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.com= > >, > >> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.googlegroups= > >.com, > >> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000prg.googlegrou= > >ps.com, > >> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: > >> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.googlegro= > >ups.com, > >> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: > > >> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>> In article > >> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.googlegroups.= > >com>, > > >> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =3DA0 And even there had been, it couldn't have melted > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel, > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. > > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> =3DA0 We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it. > > >> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible for > >> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other than > >> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000. > > >> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar? > > >> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pile > >> > >>>>>>>> at WTC. > >> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand. > > >> > >>>>>>>> -- > >> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away? > >> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molten" > >> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING. > > >> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it was > >> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled > >> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten steel. > > >> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away because it > >> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED. > >> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since the > >> > >>>>>>> evidence "we" > >> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute." > > >> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's your claim > >> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of THAT > >> > >>>>>> claim? > > >> > >>>>> Where is the building? > > >> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world. > > >> > >>> Liar. > >> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard. > > >> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world, and > >> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had access. > > >> > >>>>> Who has it? > > >> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever? > > >> > >>> No answer noted. > > >> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted. > > >> > >>>>> Did it disappear? > > >> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who wanted to > >> > >>>> see it. > > >> > >>> Liar. > > >> > >> Prove it. > > >> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored. > > >> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly included > >> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion. > > >> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it. > > >> > >> Prove it. > > >> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never existed? > > >> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist. > > >> > >>> Liar. > >> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.pdf > > >> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just > >> > >> fantasies and arm waving. > > >> > >>>>> How convenient. > > >> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient? > > >> > >>> The truth is the truth. > > >> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing. > > >> > >>> You are in denial. > > >> > >> Of fantasies. > > >> > > Your Mossad tactics. > >> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&rlz=3D1G1GGLQ_ENUS345&q=3Ddisinfo= > >+tact... > > >> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics. =A0got it. > > >> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he is. It > >> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes. > > >http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm > > >Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is > >owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact and > >should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way. > > What does this have to do with the eyewitnesses, possibly as many as > 100,000 that saw to some aspect of 9/11 and none of whom have joined > any "truth" movement. > "None?" Proof? > I'm one of those eyewitnesses. > So you are denying your own eyes. http://www.family.org.sg/default.aspx?go=article&aid=643 > -- > Al Dykes > News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. > - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail And also your sig makes you a hypocrite.
From: Al Dykes on 4 Oct 2009 19:07
In article <e8591c31-2930-460b-b10e-203db9e19c1c(a)q40g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, <knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Oct 4, 2:46=A0am, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> In article <63ec6e4d-819a-4c83-9c1d-80479509c...(a)b25g2000prb.googlegroups= >.com>, >> >> >> >> =A0<knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >On Oct 3, 2:04=3DA0pm, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> On Oct 3, 1:46=3DA0pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >> >> > Innews:e32b8bbc-63db-4a1e-aacb-8a37dcbcbabc(a)i4g2000prm.googlegroups.= >com=3D >> >, >> >> > knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> > > On Oct 3, 7:11 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >> > >> Innews:216eb011-4375-45a9-a6e3-8b8c16716135(a)y28g2000prd.googlegro= >ups=3D >> >.com, >> >> > >> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> > >>> On Oct 2, 4:39 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >> > >>>> Innews:6a329f66-529c-4225-b022-39c9f5eb0426(a)v37g2000prg.googleg= >rou=3D >> >ps.com, >> >> > >>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2:35 pm, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>> Innews:852aa34a-add3-464d-abed-3068ff9b03db(a)g1g2000pra.google= >gro=3D >> >ups.com, >> >> > >>>>>> knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> mused: >> >> >> > >>>>>>> On Oct 1, 12:22 pm, ady...(a)panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>> In article >> >> > >>>>>>>> <dd6e9f5e-86fd-4222-a0ae-dde189490...(a)d9g2000prh.googlegrou= >ps.=3D >> >com>, >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> <knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 8:13=3D3DA0am, Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote= >: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 7:58=3D3DA0am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Daniel wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 23, 3:49 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D3DA0 And even there had been, it couldn't have melt= >ed >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the steel, >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It didn't melt the steel, and it didn't have to. >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> =3D3DA0 We know the fires didn't melt the steel. Only >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> thermite explains it. >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> No steel melted, and it is physically impossible for >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> thermite to produce what happened on 9/11. Other than >> >> > >>>>>>>>>> that, Hankie, you're still batting 0.000. >> >> >> > >>>>>>>>> How does one become such a liar? >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> There is no eyewitness reports of molten steel on the pile >> >> > >>>>>>>> at WTC. >> >> > >>>>>>>> All the reports are second-hand. >> >> >> > >>>>>>>> -- >> >> > >>>>>>> So who took the "first hand" evidence away? >> >> > >>>>>>> There are EYEWITNESS accounts of "red hot flowing molten" >> >> > >>>>>>> SOMETHING. >> >> >> > >>>>>> Even if that fantasy were true, it's not proof that it was >> >> > >>>>>> steel. Moreover, you've never shown how any controlled >> >> > >>>>>> demolition has ever resulted in pools of molten steel. >> >> >> > >>>>>>> The eyewitness couldn't cart the "evidence" away because it >> >> > >>>>>>> was CONTROLLED. >> >> > >>>>>>> ANY "true scientific" analysis is "IMPOSSIBLE" since the >> >> > >>>>>>> evidence "we" >> >> > >>>>>>> have is "in dispute." >> >> >> > >>>>>> So you have no proof for your claims because it's your claim >> >> > >>>>>> that all the proof was stolen. Do you have any proof of THAT >> >> > >>>>>> claim? >> >> >> > >>>>> Where is the building? >> >> >> > >>>> In the middle of the largest city in the world. >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> > >>> It was hauled away under heavy guard. >> >> >> > >> In the middle of one of the largest cities in the world, and >> >> > >> then over to various sites to which almost anyone had access. >> >> >> > >>>>> Who has it? >> >> >> > >>>> Did you expect it to be saved forever? >> >> >> > >>> No answer noted. >> >> >> > >> Yes, your non answer is noted. >> >> >> > >>>>> Did it disappear? >> >> >> > >>>> Not before it was thouroughly examined by anyone who wanted to >> >> > >>>> see it. >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> >> > >> Prove it. >> >> >> > >>> And the evidence of what was examined has been ignored. >> >> >> > >> All the real evidence of what happened was thoroughly included >> >> > >> in the determination of the real conclusion. >> >> >> > >>> So you and the report writers lie about it. >> >> >> > >> Prove it. >> >> >> > >>>>> If there is none does that mean the buildings never existed? >> >> >> > >>>> It means that your imaginary thermite didn't exist. >> >> >> > >>> Liar. >> >> > >>>http://journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/Ryan_NIST_and_Nano-1.p= >df >> >> >> > >> Nothing there is proof of anything at all. It's all just >> >> > >> fantasies and arm waving. >> >> >> > >>>>> How convenient. >> >> >> > >>>> So all of your proof is that THE truth is convenient? >> >> >> > >>> The truth is the truth. >> >> >> > >> Of which you seem to be incapable of recognizing. >> >> >> > >>> You are in denial. >> >> >> > >> Of fantasies. >> >> >> > > Your Mossad tactics. >> >> > >http://www.google.com/search?hl=3D3Den&rlz=3D3D1G1GGLQ_ENUS345&q=3D= >3Ddisinfo=3D >> >+tact... >> >> >> > So THAT's where you learned your tactics. =3DA0got it. >> >> >> He's finally exposing himself for the anti-semitic kooker he is. It >> >> all comes down to the evil joooooooooos for these asswipes. >> >> >http://rense.com/general87/nhe.htm >> >> >Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is >> >owned and controlled by Zionist Jews. This is a statement of fact and >> >should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way. >> >> What does this have to do with the eyewitnesses, possibly as many as >> 100,000 that saw to some aspect of 9/11 and none of whom have joined >> any "truth" movement. >> >"None?" >Proof? > Name one. -- Al Dykes News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising. - Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail |