Prev: 9-11 Truth - Inside Job
Next: Brain Locus as Radio Re: Precision definition of life versus nonlife Chapt 21 #255 Atom Totality #27 Brain Locus theory
From: Claudius Denk on 1 Aug 2010 18:20 On Aug 1, 2:39 pm, Roger Coppock <rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: > You seem to have trouble with the basic science. > I expected many people on this forum would, that > is why I included the following link in my original post: > > To get a grip on global warming science, Here are some lectures > recorded in a classroom at a world class university: > > http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FA75A0DDB89ACCD7 Roger, you can't say you weren't given an opportunity to make a retraction.
From: Sam Wormley on 1 Aug 2010 19:07 On 8/1/10 3:21 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > On Aug 1, 1:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: > >> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by >> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and an estimate >> of the growth of that forcing over time. >> >> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v410/n6826/abs/410355a0.html > > I read your link thoroughly. Unfortunately I was unable to find > anything therein that can be described as, "actual measurement of the > climate forcing by CO2 and other greenhouse gases." Might I have > missed it? Maybe you could be so kind as to cut and paste something > from the text that specifically substantiates this assertion? > > Thanks in advance for your response. > See Figure 3 http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/ http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi_2008.fig3_med.png
From: Sam Wormley on 1 Aug 2010 19:08 On 8/1/10 4:38 PM, Last Post wrote: > On Aug 1, 4:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: > >> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by >> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and an estimate >> of the growth of that forcing over time. > > � There is NO climate forcing by CO2 and > "other greenhouse gases" >> >> http://www.nature.com > > � Nature is not a peer-reviewed journal THE NOAA ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS INDEX (AGGI) http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/
From: Last Post on 1 Aug 2010 19:46 On Aug 1, 7:08 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/1/10 4:38 PM, Last Post wrote: > > > On Aug 1, 4:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com>  wrote: > > >> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by > >> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and an estimate > >> of the growth of that forcing over time. > > > à There is NO climate forcing by CO2 and > >    "other greenhouse gases" > > >>http://www.nature.com > > > à Nature is not a peer-reviewed journal > > THE NOAA ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS INDEX (AGGI) >   http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/ à A total waste of time and space GH GAS | TOTAL | NATUR |MAN MADE âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ H2O Vapour | 95.000% | 94.999% |0.001% âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ â¨CO2 | 03.618% | 3.502% |0.117% âââââââââââââ¨âââââââââââââââââââ Methane | 0.260% | 0.294% |0.066% âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ Nitrous oxide | 0.950% | 0.903% |0.047% âââââââââââ¨âââââââââââââââââââââ Misc, CFC etc| 0.072% | 0.025% |0.047% âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ Not much there is there, Sam? â â | In real science the burden of proof is always | on the proposer, never on the skeptics. So far | neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one | iota of valid data for global warming nor have | they provided data that climate change is being | effected by commerce and industry, and not by | natural causes.
From: Claudius Denk on 1 Aug 2010 19:55
On Aug 1, 4:07 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/1/10 3:21 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > > > > > > > On Aug 1, 1:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: > > >> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by > >> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and an estimate > >> of the growth of that forcing over time. > > >>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v410/n6826/abs/410355a0.html > > > I read your link thoroughly. Unfortunately I was unable to find > > anything therein that can be described as, "actual measurement of the > > climate forcing by CO2 and other greenhouse gases." Might I have > > missed it? Maybe you could be so kind as to cut and paste something > > from the text that specifically substantiates this assertion? > > > Thanks in advance for your response. > > See Figure 3 > http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/ > http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi_2008.fig3_med.png Thank you, Mr. Wormley. The rapidity of your response is appreciated. I read your link thoroughly. Unfortunately I was unable to find anything therein that can be described as, "actual measurement of the climate forcing by CO2 and other greenhouse gases." Might I have missed it? Maybe you could be so kind as to cut and paste something from the text that specifically substantiates this assertion? BTW, if the term, "cut and paste," is foreign to your ears I suggest you research the topic. (EG. go to *Google* and search that exact phrase: "cut and paste.") I am genuinely waiting in anticipation of a detailed (and non- adhominen) response from you on this very important matter. Regards, (And, checkmate.) |