A Measurement of CO2 Climate Forcing, and an estimation of it's increase.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: 9-11 Truth - Inside Job
Next: Brain Locus as Radio Re: Precision definition of life versus nonlife Chapt 21 #255 Atom Totality #27 Brain Locus theory
From: Last Post on 4 Aug 2010 11:14 On Aug 3, 9:12 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/3/10 9:51 AM, leonard7...(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > It's your gullibility, Worm. You are a sucker > > for anything that has AGW in it. When push > > comes to shove your 5 cites are all frauds, and > > some are based on fraudulent data provided by > > NOAA, GISS/NASA, Hadley/CRU, and MET > > Fool easily, Leonard? Ø Yes you do, Worm! There are three types of people that you can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil. 1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the logic of what you say. You have to tell them what is right in very simple terms. If they do not agree, you will never be able to change their mind. 2- The religious fanatic: If what you say goes against their religious belief, they will cling to that belief even if it means their death. 3- There is no way to reform evil- not in a million years. There is no way to convince anthropogenic_global_warming_alarmists, terrorists, serial killers, paedophiles, and predators to change their evil ways, They knew what they were doing was wrong, but knowledge didn't stop them. It only made them more careful in how they went about performing their evil deeds.
From: george on 4 Aug 2010 19:26 On Aug 5, 6:15 am, Orval Fairbairn <o_r_fairbairn(a)earth_link.net> wrote: > In article <i3bs93$47...(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > "Erwin Schroedinger" <erschroedin...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > "Bill Ward" <bw...(a)ix.REMOVETHISnetcom.com> wrote in message > >news:O7mdnXdJx9aEOsXRnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > > > On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 09:21:27 +0200, Tom P wrote: > > > >> On 08/01/2010 11:38 PM, Last Post wrote: > > >>> On Aug 1, 4:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: > > > >>>> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by CO2 and other > > >>>> greenhouse gases, and an estimate of the growth of that forcing over > > >>>> time. > > > >>> Ø There is NO climate forcing by CO2 and > > >>> "other greenhouse gases" > > > >> So why is Venus so hot? > > > > Because the atmosphere is so massive. Look at the surface pressure > > > compared to Earth. > > > A massive atmosphere of, say, N2, would not make a planet hot. > > ... nor would trace amounts of CO2. After all, we are talking about > 0.04% concentration -- NOT massive percentages, like Venus. > > > > > > Why is Mars so cold? > > ...... and Mars ahs a very high percentage of CO2. > Atmosphere Composition 95.32% carbon dioxide Should be a runaway hothouse........
From: Claudius Denk on 4 Aug 2010 19:43 On Aug 4, 3:47 pm, Tom P <werot...(a)freent.dd> wrote: > On 08/04/2010 08:15 PM, Orval Fairbairn wrote: > > > > > > > In article<i3bs93$47...(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > > "Erwin Schroedinger"<erschroedin...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> "Bill Ward"<bw...(a)ix.REMOVETHISnetcom.com> wrote in message > >>news:O7mdnXdJx9aEOsXRnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > >>> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 09:21:27 +0200, Tom P wrote: > > >>>> On 08/01/2010 11:38 PM, Last Post wrote: > >>>>> On Aug 1, 4:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by CO2 and other > >>>>>> greenhouse gases, and an estimate of the growth of that forcing over > >>>>>> time. > > >>>>> Ø There is NO climate forcing by CO2 and > >>>>> "other greenhouse gases" > > >>>> So why is Venus so hot? > > >>> Because the atmosphere is so massive. Look at the surface pressure > >>> compared to Earth. > > >> A massive atmosphere of, say, N2, would not make a planet hot. > > > .... nor would trace amounts of CO2. After all, we are talking about > > 0.04% concentration -- NOT massive percentages, like Venus. > > The greenhouse effect on planet earth is determined primarily by WV and > CO2. WV operates in the lower troposphere, CO2 above it. This can be > seen quite clearly in the satellite measurements of the OLWR spectrum. You AGW whackos are habitual liars. > > > > > > >>> Why is Mars so cold? > > > ...... and Mars ahs a very high percentage of CO2.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: Sam Wormley on 4 Aug 2010 23:02 On 8/4/10 6:43 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > You AGW whackos are habitual liars. Translation: AKA Denk won't look at the scientific evidence. Reason for in ignorant attitude: unknown.
From: Sam Wormley on 4 Aug 2010 23:05
On 8/4/10 6:26 PM, george wrote: > Atmosphere Composition 95.32% carbon dioxide > > Should be a runaway hothouse........ Not at the conditions of atmospheric density and presure on Mars. Ever though about trying to understand the differences between the atmospheric physics on Mars and earth? "Principles of Planetary Climate" by R. T. Pierrehumbert http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/ClimateBook/ClimateVol1.pdf |