A Measurement of CO2 Climate Forcing, and an estimation of it's increase.
in [Physics]
|
Prev: 9-11 Truth - Inside Job
Next: Brain Locus as Radio Re: Precision definition of life versus nonlife Chapt 21 #255 Atom Totality #27 Brain Locus theory
From: Claudius Denk on 2 Aug 2010 10:44 On Aug 2, 4:47 am, Tom P <werot...(a)freent.dd> wrote: > On 08/02/2010 12:20 AM, Claudius Denk wrote: > > > On Aug 1, 2:39 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: > >> You seem to have trouble with the basic science. > >> I expected many people on this forum would, that > >> is why I included the following link in my original post: > > >> To get a grip on global warming science, Here are some lectures > >> recorded in a classroom at a world class university: > > >>http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=FA75A0DDB89ACCD7 > > > Roger, you can't say you weren't given an opportunity to make a > > retraction. > > Read the first sentence in the Nature article again: > "The evolution of the Earth's climate has been extensively studied1, and > a strong link between increases in surface temperatures and greenhouse > gases has been established" > > You could even try moving your lips at the same time. > > Now read this sentence: > > "Changes in the Earth's greenhouse effect can be detected from > variations in the spectrum of outgoing longwave radiation, which is a > measure of how the Earth cools to space and carries the imprint of the > gases that are responsible for the greenhouse effect" > > Now try reading this sentence: > "Our results provide direct experimental evidence for a significant > increase in the Earth's greenhouse effect that is consistent with > concerns over radiative forcing of climate." > > Get it? Other than the one on the top of your head, do you have a point?
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Aug 2010 15:29 NEWS: Weather or Not?: Last Winter's Record Snow Driven by Short-Term Meteorologic Patterns, Not Long-Term Climate Change A new study helps to explain how extraordinary snowfalls occur despite global warming http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=weather-or-not-last-winte&sc=DD_20100802
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Aug 2010 15:43 On 8/1/10 3:21 PM, Claudius Denk wrote: > On Aug 1, 1:16 pm, Roger Coppock<rcopp...(a)adnc.com> wrote: > >> An actual measurement of the climate forcing by >> CO2 and other greenhouse gases, and an estimate >> of the growth of that forcing over time. >> >> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v410/n6826/abs/410355a0.html > > I read your link thoroughly. Unfortunately I was unable to find > anything therein that can be described as, "actual measurement of the > climate forcing by CO2 and other greenhouse gases." Might I have > missed it? Maybe you could be so kind as to cut and paste something > from the text that specifically substantiates this assertion? > > Thanks in advance for your response. > 60-SECOND PSYCH PODCAST: Busting the Myth That Opposites Attract When it comes to love, we're ambivalent about "opposites attract" http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=global-warming-is-undeniable-10-08-01&sc=DD_20100802
From: Sam Wormley on 2 Aug 2010 15:44 On 8/1/10 4:58 PM, Last Post wrote: > There are three types of people that you > can_not_talk_into_behaving_well. The > stupid, the religious fanatic, and the evil. > > 1- The stupid aren't smart enough to follow the > logic of what you say. You have to tell them > what is right in very simple terms. If they do > not agree, you will never be able to change > their mind. > > 2- The religious fanatic: If what you say goes > against their religious belief, they will cling to > that belief even if it means their death. > > 3- There is no way to reform evil- not in a > million years. There is no way to convince > > anthropogenic_global_warming_alarmists, > > terrorists, serial killers, paedophiles, and > > predators to change their evil ways, They > knew what they were doing was wrong, but > knowledge didn't stop them. It only made > them more careful in how they went about > performing their evil deeds. 60-SECOND PSYCH PODCAST: Busting the Myth That Opposites Attract When it comes to love, we're ambivalent about "opposites attract" http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=global-warming-is-undeniable-10-08-01&sc=DD_20100802
From: Claudius Denk on 2 Aug 2010 15:45
On Aug 2, 12:29 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > NEWS: Weather or Not?: Last Winter's Record Snow Driven by Short-Term > Meteorologic Patterns, Not Long-Term Climate Change > A new study helps to explain how extraordinary snowfalls occur despite > global warming > > http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=weather-or-not-last-.... Blatant speculation. |