A simple Q. but not a simple A,,
in [Physics]
|
Prev: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ FLIGHT RESERVATIONS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Next: superlatives of Volcano-Electricity #47 Volcano-Electricity: Earth's Energy Future
From: glird on 22 Jan 2010 21:08 On Jan 22, 6:04 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "cjcountess" <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > you are just trying to dance around the issue > > No .. that's what you are doing now that your dishonesty (or > stupidity) is exposed > > > I'll just leave it like that and let the people judge for themselves > > So you lie and run away. You're a coward. Either one or the other regardless of choice three. (Even a coward can't lie AND run away.) Either way, would you guys PLEASE stop making fools of each other? glirD
From: Inertial on 22 Jan 2010 21:14 "glird" <glird(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:5f5d9aa8-c30d-4eca-8441-f8fa9d8e7f41(a)f12g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > On Jan 22, 6:04 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> "cjcountess" <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> > you are just trying to dance around the issue >> >> No .. that's what you are doing now that your dishonesty (or >> stupidity) is exposed >> >> > I'll just leave it like that and let the people judge for themselves >> >> So you lie and run away. You're a coward. > > Either one or the other regardless of choice three. > (Even a coward can't lie AND run away.) Of course he can. He tells a lie and then runs away. Or can even tell the lie AS he runs away. Or do you mean 'lie' as in 'be in a horizontal position' ??? > Either way, would you guys PLEASE stop making fools of each other? I haven't.
From: Inertial on 22 Jan 2010 21:28 "Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> wrote in message news:036a480e$0$1314$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > > "glird" <glird(a)aol.com> wrote in message > news:5f5d9aa8-c30d-4eca-8441-f8fa9d8e7f41(a)f12g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> On Jan 22, 6:04 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >>> "cjcountess" <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> > you are just trying to dance around the issue >>> >>> No .. that's what you are doing now that your dishonesty (or >>> stupidity) is exposed >>> >>> > I'll just leave it like that and let the people judge for themselves >>> >>> So you lie and run away. You're a coward. >> >> Either one or the other regardless of choice three. >> (Even a coward can't lie AND run away.) > > Of course he can. He tells a lie and then runs away. Or can even tell > the lie AS he runs away. Or do you mean 'lie' as in 'be in a horizontal > position' ??? > >> Either way, would you guys PLEASE stop making fools of each other? > > I haven't. Well, haven't made a fool of myself. And countess has made enough of a fool of himself already .. I just pointed it out.
From: cjcountess on 23 Jan 2010 08:23 Even if I left out the disputed equations it would not invalidate my findings The geometrical evidence is sound it is also backed by mathmatical evidence listed by Planck Einstien Debroglie and Bohr that is independant of but still supports it You have no argument. E=mc^2+1/2mv^2 does not make E=mc^2 invalid and E=hf/c^2(delta)V does not make E=hf/c^2 invalid. Show us your work, you have none, and so you resort to criticising. But the more you clain to know, the more you reveal what you don' t know. You act like a jealious woman. Excuse me ladies, you are not that bad. You are a pitiful failier and you want to strike out at others But you cannot touch me Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 23 Jan 2010 10:12
You are right Spencer, except for last statement. Some of us do think that we comprehend how quantum and relativity can agree. But lots of us, I included, use these threads as jump off points, to test and talk about our own ideas, especialy if we think our idears can answer the question at hand. But some of these arguments do get messy, and imature, and so I am going to rest my case, but with the introduction of just one more piece of evidence that (E=hf/c^2), is valid equation than I am not going to waste my time anymore on it http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4TSHB_enUS314US314&q=e%3dhf%2fc2 Using above Google search I found Spacetime physics: introduction to special relativity - Google Books Result by Edwin F. Taylor, John Archibald Wheeler - 1992 - Science - 312 pages Use the Einstein relation between photon energy £ and classical wave frequency / namely £CTM = WOT E = hf/c2 and £' = hf/c2, to derive the transformations Conrad J Countess |