Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to date [Relativity]

Prev: Anitmatter in Thunderbolts??
Next: Why Pendulum as a clock do not shows, what General Theory of Relativity predicts?

From: PD on 3 Dec 2009 12:10

On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works.
>
> > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work?
> > > > > How does entanglement physically work?
> > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a
> > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or
> > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs
> > > > > and have nothing to do with nature).
> > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment?
> > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment?
>
> > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really
> > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in
> > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your
> > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I
> > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right
> > > > answer is.
>
> > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you
> > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow.
>
> > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to
> > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to
> > > > make up their own answers.
>
> > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to
> > > date.
>
> > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence.
>
> > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis,
> > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are
> > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken
> > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for
> > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation.
>
> That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is
> incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in
> the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am
> saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon
> is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite
> momentum due to conservation of momentum.
>
> Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is
> just more evidence of your mediocre mind.

And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves
according to your description?

>
>
>
> > > > > All of the above are answered by two simply physical properties. A
> > > > > photon consists of a physical wave in the aether and the ability to be
> > > > > detected as a quantum of aether. The physical wave in the aether
> > > > > travels the available paths and the photon 'particle' (i.e. the
> > > > > ability of the photon to be detected as a quantum of aether) travels a
> > > > > single path. In the EPR paradox, due to conservation of momentum, the
> > > > > 'particle' pair's momentum are exact opposites.
>
> > > > > Now, obviously, you have a mediocre mind and will not understand the
> > > > > above paragraph.
>
>

From: mpc755 on 3 Dec 2009 12:19

On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works.
>
> > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work?
> > > > > > How does entanglement physically work?
> > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a
> > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or
> > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs
> > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature).
> > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment?
> > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment?
>
> > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really
> > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in
> > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your
> > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I
> > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right
> > > > > answer is.
>
> > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you
> > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow.
>
> > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to
> > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to
> > > > > make up their own answers.
>
> > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to
> > > > date.
>
> > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence..
>
> > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis,
> > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are
> > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken
> > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for
> > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation.
>
> > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is
> > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in
> > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am
> > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon
> > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite
> > momentum due to conservation of momentum.
>
> > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is
> > just more evidence of your mediocre mind.
>
> And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves
> according to your description?
>

Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter
multiple slits besides you?

Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact
opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you?

>
> > > > > > All of the above are answered by two simply physical properties.. A
> > > > > > photon consists of a physical wave in the aether and the ability to be
> > > > > > detected as a quantum of aether. The physical wave in the aether
> > > > > > travels the available paths and the photon 'particle' (i.e. the
> > > > > > ability of the photon to be detected as a quantum of aether) travels a
> > > > > > single path. In the EPR paradox, due to conservation of momentum, the
> > > > > > 'particle' pair's momentum are exact opposites.
>
> > > > > > Now, obviously, you have a mediocre mind and will not understand the
> > > > > > above paragraph.
>
>

From: PD on 3 Dec 2009 12:34

On Dec 3, 11:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works.
>
> > > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work?
> > > > > > > How does entanglement physically work?
> > > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a
> > > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or
> > > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs
> > > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature).
> > > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment?
> > > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment?
>
> > > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really
> > > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in
> > > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your
> > > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is.. I
> > > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right
> > > > > > answer is.
>
> > > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you
> > > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow..
>
> > > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to
> > > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to
> > > > > > make up their own answers.
>
> > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to
> > > > > date.
>
> > > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence.
>
> > > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis,
> > > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are
> > > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken
> > > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for
> > > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation.
>
> > > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is
> > > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in
> > > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am
> > > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon
> > > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite
> > > momentum due to conservation of momentum.
>
> > > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is
> > > just more evidence of your mediocre mind.
>
> > And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves
> > according to your description?
>
> Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter
> multiple slits besides you?
>
> Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact
> opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you?

You didn't answer my question.

Now you've added another symptom of psychosis, having imaginary
friends that think like you do, just because that makes sense to YOU.

You do know you have a problem, right?

>
>
>
> > > > > > > All of the above are answered by two simply physical properties. A
> > > > > > > photon consists of a physical wave in the aether and the ability to be
> > > > > > > detected as a quantum of aether. The physical wave in the aether
> > > > > > > travels the available paths and the photon 'particle' (i.e. the
> > > > > > > ability of the photon to be detected as a quantum of aether) travels a
> > > > > > > single path. In the EPR paradox, due to conservation of momentum, the
> > > > > > > 'particle' pair's momentum are exact opposites.
>
> > > > > > > Now, obviously, you have a mediocre mind and will not understand the
> > > > > > > above paragraph.
>
>

From: mpc755 on 3 Dec 2009 12:39

On Dec 3, 12:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 11:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works.
>
> > > > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work?
> > > > > > > > How does entanglement physically work?
> > > > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a
> > > > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or
> > > > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs
> > > > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature).
> > > > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment?
> > > > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment?
>
> > > > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really
> > > > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in
> > > > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your
> > > > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I
> > > > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right
> > > > > > > answer is.
>
> > > > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you
> > > > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow.
>
> > > > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to
> > > > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to
> > > > > > > make up their own answers.
>
> > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to
> > > > > > date.
>
> > > > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence.
>
> > > > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis,
> > > > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are
> > > > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken
> > > > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for
> > > > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation.
>
> > > > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is
> > > > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in
> > > > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am
> > > > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon
> > > > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite
> > > > momentum due to conservation of momentum.
>
> > > > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is
> > > > just more evidence of your mediocre mind.
>
> > > And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves
> > > according to your description?
>
> > Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter
> > multiple slits besides you?
>
> > Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact
> > opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you?
>
> You didn't answer my question.
>
> Now you've added another symptom of psychosis, having imaginary
> friends that think like you do, just because that makes sense to YOU.
>
> You do know you have a problem, right?
>

Do you understand a wave in a medium is able to travel multiple paths?

Do you realize the C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the
aether in a double slit experiment?

From: mpc755 on 3 Dec 2009 13:27

First | Prev | Next | Last
Pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Prev: Anitmatter in Thunderbolts??
Next: Why Pendulum as a clock do not shows, what General Theory of Relativity predicts?