Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to date
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Anitmatter in Thunderbolts??
Next: Why Pendulum as a clock do not shows, what General Theory of Relativity predicts?
From: mpc755 on 3 Dec 2009 13:32 On Dec 3, 12:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works. > > > > > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work? > > > > > > > > How does entanglement physically work? > > > > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a > > > > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or > > > > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs > > > > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature). > > > > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment? > > > > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment? > > > > > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really > > > > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in > > > > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your > > > > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I > > > > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right > > > > > > > answer is. > > > > > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you > > > > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow. > > > > > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to > > > > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to > > > > > > > make up their own answers. > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to > > > > > > date. > > > > > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence. > > > > > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis, > > > > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are > > > > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken > > > > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for > > > > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation. > > > > > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is > > > > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in > > > > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am > > > > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon > > > > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite > > > > momentum due to conservation of momentum. > > > > > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is > > > > just more evidence of your mediocre mind. > > > > And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves > > > according to your description? > > > Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter > > multiple slits besides you? > > > Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact > > opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you? > > You didn't answer my question. > > Now you've added another symptom of psychosis, having imaginary > friends that think like you do, just because that makes sense to YOU. > > You do know you have a problem, right? > Do you understand a wave in a medium is able to travel multiple paths? Do you realize the C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether in a double slit experiment? Choosing to believe 60 interconnected atoms can travel through multiple slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing energy, or having a change in momentum vs. aether exists is the sign of a mediocre mind. Choosing to believe the future determines the past vs. aether exists is the sign of a mediocre mind. Choosing to believe in instantaneous action at a distance and entanglement and not being able to understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact opposite momentum in order to conserve momentum is the sign of a mediocre mind. Refusing to believe a not at rest displaced aether physically explains gravity, quantum eraser experiments, delayed choice experiments and double slit experiments is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > > > > > > > > > All of the above are answered by two simply physical properties. A > > > > > > > > photon consists of a physical wave in the aether and the ability to be > > > > > > > > detected as a quantum of aether. The physical wave in the aether > > > > > > > > travels the available paths and the photon 'particle' (i.e. the > > > > > > > > ability of the photon to be detected as a quantum of aether) travels a > > > > > > > > single path. In the EPR paradox, due to conservation of momentum, the > > > > > > > > 'particle' pair's momentum are exact opposites. > > > > > > > > > Now, obviously, you have a mediocre mind and will not understand the > > > > > > > > above paragraph. > >
From: PD on 3 Dec 2009 14:19 On Dec 3, 12:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 12:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works. > > > > > > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work? > > > > > > > > > How does entanglement physically work? > > > > > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a > > > > > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or > > > > > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs > > > > > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature). > > > > > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment? > > > > > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment? > > > > > > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really > > > > > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in > > > > > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your > > > > > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I > > > > > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right > > > > > > > > answer is. > > > > > > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you > > > > > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow. > > > > > > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to > > > > > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to > > > > > > > > make up their own answers. > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to > > > > > > > date. > > > > > > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence. > > > > > > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis, > > > > > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are > > > > > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken > > > > > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for > > > > > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation. > > > > > > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is > > > > > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in > > > > > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am > > > > > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon > > > > > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite > > > > > momentum due to conservation of momentum. > > > > > > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is > > > > > just more evidence of your mediocre mind. > > > > > And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves > > > > according to your description? > > > > Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter > > > multiple slits besides you? > > > > Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact > > > opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you? > > > You didn't answer my question. > > > Now you've added another symptom of psychosis, having imaginary > > friends that think like you do, just because that makes sense to YOU. > > > You do know you have a problem, right? > > Do you understand a wave in a medium is able to travel multiple paths? > > Do you realize the C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the > aether in a double slit experiment? > > Choosing to believe 60 interconnected atoms can travel through > multiple slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing > energy, or having a change in momentum vs. aether exists is the sign > of a mediocre mind. > > Choosing to believe the future determines the past vs. aether exists > is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > Choosing to believe in instantaneous action at a distance and > entanglement and not being able to understand a downgraded photon pair > must have exact opposite momentum in order to conserve momentum is the > sign of a mediocre mind. > > Refusing to believe a not at rest displaced aether physically explains > gravity, quantum eraser experiments, delayed choice experiments and > double slit experiments is the sign of a mediocre mind. > ......aaaaand so being unable to face the personality issues that are impeding your ability to actually learn anything, you fall back on the reliable, passive-aggressive strategy of repeating your self-generated statements over and over and over again, the verbose analog of "La-la- la-la-la! I can't HEAR YOU!"
From: BURT on 3 Dec 2009 14:53 On Dec 3, 7:03 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 2, 9:10 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 9:49 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 2, 2:30 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 2, 3:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 2, 11:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 2, 1:16 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 1, 10:05 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 10:40 am, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 30, 6:01 am, mpc755 wrote: > > > > > > > > > >< glird, > > > > > > > > > The denser the local material is per volume, the stronger the > > > > > > > > > reactive aether pressure will be. > > > > > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > > > > >< The displacement wave the C-60 molecule creates in the aether exists prior to the C-60 molecule entering a slit.> > > > > > > > > > Yes. (The molecule travels far slower than the wave, which travels > > > > > > > > > in air at c.) > > > > > > > > > ><The aether displacement wave created by the C-60 molecule enters available slits. The observed behaviors of a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule is more a > > > > > > > > > function of the moving C-60 molecule having an associated aether > > > > > > > > > displacement wave and this wave enters available slits than it is the > > > > > > > > > C-60 molecule affecting the material which separates the slits. > > > > > > > > > > Yes; BUT the molecule also affects the material filling the slit and > > > > > > > > > that of the wall. In effect, the wall becomes asymmetrically charged. > > > > > > > > > It is stronger on one side of the slit and the walls than in and on > > > > > > > > > the other. > > > > > > > > > Although that has a negligible affect on subsequent wave systems, it > > > > > > > > > has a measurable affect on the relatively slow moving molecules that > > > > > > > > > subsequently traverse each slit. THAT'S what causes the resulting > > > > > > > > > pattern that appears in such experiments. > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > I disagree with the last sentence. The C-60 molecule interacting with > > > > > > > > the single slit could be shown to be incorrect by placing a barrier in > > > > > > > > front of one of the slits. Send the C-60 molecule multiple times > > > > > > > > through the unblocked slit. Then switch which slit is blocked and re- > > > > > > > > execute the test so the C-60 molecule enters and exits the other slit, > > > > > > > > which is now unblocked, multiple times. There will not be an > > > > > > > > interference pattern because the displacement wave was not allowed to > > > > > > > > physically enter and exit the available slits, create interference, > > > > > > > > and alter the direction the C-60 molecule travels. > > > > > > > > > The distance the slits are apart will effect the pattern. > > > > > > > > > The red and blue lines in the image on the right here represents the > > > > > > > > paths the photon wave travels:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experi... > > > > > > > > > The photon wave is physically traveling the available paths and when > > > > > > > > the red and blue paths are combined, interference occurs, altering the > > > > > > > > direction the photon 'particle' travels. This is misinterpreted as > > > > > > > > something is being erased. > > > > > > > > > Something similar is occurring when a C-60 molecule is used in a > > > > > > > > double slit experiment. The displacement wave the C-60 molecule > > > > > > > > creates in the aether physically enters and exits the available slits, > > > > > > > > creating interference, altering the direction the C-60 molecule > > > > > > > > travels. This is functionally the same as a boat and its bow wave. If > > > > > > > > there is only a single slit the bow wave the boat is creating will not > > > > > > > > greatly alter the direction the boat is traveling upon exiting the > > > > > > > > slit. If there are multiple slits, the bow wave enters and exits the > > > > > > > > multiple slits. The bow waves exiting the slits the boat does not > > > > > > > > travel through will cross out ahead of the boat's path and interfere > > > > > > > > with the bow waves exiting the other slits, including the bow wave > > > > > > > > riding out ahead of and along with the boat through the slit the boat > > > > > > > > travels through, and alter the direction the boat travels. > > > > > > > > You may be right. :-) > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > There is no right or wrong. Only correct and incorrect. Right and > > > > > > wrong are final. Correct and incorrect can change as experimental > > > > > > evidence is re-evaluated (like delayed choice experiments better > > > > > > interpreted as physical waves in the aether traveling available > > > > > > paths). > > > > > > > What we need is evidence of physical waves in the aether traveling > > > > > > available paths. > > > > > > > We need a modified version of:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser#The_experi... > > > > > > > Where the downgraded mirror-image photons interact in such a way that > > > > > > the aether wave of one photon (not containing the photon 'particle') > > > > > > interacts with the aether wave of the other photon (containing the > > > > > > photon 'particle') and an interference pattern occurs. > > > > > > > What has to happen is the photon 'particle' of one of the photons > > > > > > needs to be detected and the photon 'particle' of the other photon > > > > > > needs not to be detected. The photon aether wave of the detected > > > > > > photon and the photon aether wave (along with the photon 'particle') > > > > > > of the other photon are combined. > > > > > > > An interference pattern should still be created in this scenario. > > > > > > > I know of no way QM could account for this because after the one > > > > > > photon 'particle' is detected, that is it. There is no associated > > > > > > aether wave and the other photon 'particle' has nothing to interfere > > > > > > with so an interference pattern should not be created. > > > > > > > Now of course, since QM is very incorrect, something will be made up > > > > > > about delayed choice or erasers or some other such nonsense. But, this > > > > > > experiment will be more evidence of physical waves in the aether > > > > > > traveling available paths. > > > > > > > Thanks!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Einstein was the right one about Quantum Mechanics. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > Yes, it is incomplete.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Every theory is incomplete. If you do not see this you are not > > > objective about your own theory. > > > Einstein knew that QM was wrong in many ways. That is what I am > > > refering to. But science had to judge him and they were wrong. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > I am simply referring to a common interpretation of Einstein's quote: > > >http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein > > > "Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me > > that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not > > really bring us any closer to the secret of the 'old one'. I, at any > > rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice." > > Einstein himself proposed the experiment that proved him wrong. > Unfortunately, this happened after his death.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - No. That is just a wrong interpretation. Einstein was right about Qunatum Mechanics. And he still is. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 3 Dec 2009 15:28 On Dec 3, 2:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 12:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works. > > > > > > > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work? > > > > > > > > > > How does entanglement physically work? > > > > > > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a > > > > > > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or > > > > > > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs > > > > > > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature). > > > > > > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment? > > > > > > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment? > > > > > > > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really > > > > > > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in > > > > > > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your > > > > > > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I > > > > > > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right > > > > > > > > > answer is. > > > > > > > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you > > > > > > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow. > > > > > > > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to > > > > > > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to > > > > > > > > > make up their own answers. > > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to > > > > > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence. > > > > > > > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis, > > > > > > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are > > > > > > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken > > > > > > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for > > > > > > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation. > > > > > > > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is > > > > > > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in > > > > > > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am > > > > > > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon > > > > > > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite > > > > > > momentum due to conservation of momentum. > > > > > > > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is > > > > > > just more evidence of your mediocre mind. > > > > > > And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves > > > > > according to your description? > > > > > Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter > > > > multiple slits besides you? > > > > > Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact > > > > opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you? > > > > You didn't answer my question. > > > > Now you've added another symptom of psychosis, having imaginary > > > friends that think like you do, just because that makes sense to YOU. > > > > You do know you have a problem, right? > > > Do you understand a wave in a medium is able to travel multiple paths? > > > Do you realize the C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the > > aether in a double slit experiment? > > > Choosing to believe 60 interconnected atoms can travel through > > multiple slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing > > energy, or having a change in momentum vs. aether exists is the sign > > of a mediocre mind. > > > Choosing to believe the future determines the past vs. aether exists > > is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > > Choosing to believe in instantaneous action at a distance and > > entanglement and not being able to understand a downgraded photon pair > > must have exact opposite momentum in order to conserve momentum is the > > sign of a mediocre mind. > > > Refusing to believe a not at rest displaced aether physically explains > > gravity, quantum eraser experiments, delayed choice experiments and > > double slit experiments is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > .....aaaaand so being unable to face the personality issues that are > impeding your ability to actually learn anything, you fall back on the > reliable, passive-aggressive strategy of repeating your self-generated > statements over and over and over again, the verbose analog of "La-la- > la-la-la! I can't HEAR YOU!" Anyone who chooses to believe a moving C-60 molecule, 60 interconnected atoms, enters, travels through, and exits multiple slits without requiring energy, releasing energy, or having a change in momentum, is a more correct physical description of the observed behaviors of C-60 molecules in a double slit experiment vs. the moving C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether is incorrect.
From: mpc755 on 3 Dec 2009 15:30
On Dec 3, 2:19 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 3, 12:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:34 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Dec 3, 12:10 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:23 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:19 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:16 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 11:14 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:00 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 3, 10:47 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nonsense. We certain do have a good idea how it physically works. > > > > > > > > > > > How does instantaneous action at a distance physically work? > > > > > > > > > > How does entanglement physically work? > > > > > > > > > > How does a particle physically create an interference pattern in a > > > > > > > > > > double slit experiment? (And once you respond with 'function' or > > > > > > > > > > 'probability' it will be noted that these are mathematical constructs > > > > > > > > > > and have nothing to do with nature). > > > > > > > > > > How is something physically delayed in a delayed choice experiment? > > > > > > > > > > How is something physically erased in a quantum eraser experiment? > > > > > > > > > > Now, you see, you've asked a bunch of questions, but you're not really > > > > > > > > > interested in the answers. I can see this because you instead jump in > > > > > > > > > with *your own* shallow, uninformed answers. You'd rather make up your > > > > > > > > > own answer to a question than to learn what the right answer is. I > > > > > > > > > take it that's because you're intimidated by learning what the right > > > > > > > > > answer is. > > > > > > > > > > So you PRETEND that there isn't any other answer other than what you > > > > > > > > > want to believe. This is easier for your fragile ego to swallow. > > > > > > > > > > This is a personality defect, MPC. It will inhibit your ability to > > > > > > > > > learn anything. Fear of learning often forces the insecure person to > > > > > > > > > make up their own answers. > > > > > > > > > Aether Displacement is the most correct physical unified theory to > > > > > > > > date. > > > > > > > > > Your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the above sentence. > > > > > > > > Congratulations, MPC, you're moving into fully-ignited psychosis, > > > > > > > exhibiting the classic symptom of thinking that your statements are > > > > > > > true but too advanced for other mortals to understand. It hasn't taken > > > > > > > you long to move to this stage, and so I expect it won't take long for > > > > > > > you to descend into complete breakdown and incapacitation. > > > > > > > That's not what I am saying at all. I am saying your mediocre mind is > > > > > > incapable of understanding a photon consists of a displacement wave in > > > > > > the aether and the ability to be detected as a quantum of aether. I am > > > > > > saying your mediocre mind is incapable of understanding when a photon > > > > > > is downgraded to a photon pair, the pair must have exact opposite > > > > > > momentum due to conservation of momentum. > > > > > > > Of course, you think you speak for everyone, when in fact, that is > > > > > > just more evidence of your mediocre mind. > > > > > > And who have you found that DOES understand that nature behaves > > > > > according to your description? > > > > > Who doesn't understand a wave propagating through a medium will enter > > > > multiple slits besides you? > > > > > Who doesn't understand a downgraded photon pair must have exact > > > > opposite momentum due to conservation of momentum besides you? > > > > You didn't answer my question. > > > > Now you've added another symptom of psychosis, having imaginary > > > friends that think like you do, just because that makes sense to YOU. > > > > You do know you have a problem, right? > > > Do you understand a wave in a medium is able to travel multiple paths? > > > Do you realize the C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the > > aether in a double slit experiment? > > > Choosing to believe 60 interconnected atoms can travel through > > multiple slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing > > energy, or having a change in momentum vs. aether exists is the sign > > of a mediocre mind. > > > Choosing to believe the future determines the past vs. aether exists > > is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > > Choosing to believe in instantaneous action at a distance and > > entanglement and not being able to understand a downgraded photon pair > > must have exact opposite momentum in order to conserve momentum is the > > sign of a mediocre mind. > > > Refusing to believe a not at rest displaced aether physically explains > > gravity, quantum eraser experiments, delayed choice experiments and > > double slit experiments is the sign of a mediocre mind. > > .....aaaaand so being unable to face the personality issues that are > impeding your ability to actually learn anything, you fall back on the > reliable, passive-aggressive strategy of repeating your self-generated > statements over and over and over again, the verbose analog of "La-la- > la-la-la! I can't HEAR YOU!" Anyone who chooses to believe a moving C-60 molecule, 60 interconnected atoms, enters, travels through, and exits multiple slits simultaneously without requiring energy, releasing energy, or having a change in momentum, is a more correct physical description of the observed behaviors of C-60 molecules in a double slit experiment vs. the moving C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether is incorrect. |