Prev: LHC versus cranks : 1-0
Next: Higgs security
From: mpc755 on 1 Apr 2010 00:09
On Mar 31, 11:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> > C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
> > C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
> > experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
> > the available slits. >
>
> The C60 molecule could easily be replaced with any other molecular
> form and they will always have the exact same quantum macro aether
> wave. Free electric particles can wave collapse taking the macro
> aether wave with them.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

The C-60 molecule can be replaced by any 'particle', including a
photon.

Every moving physical 'particle' has an associated physical aether
wave.

The size of the associated aether wave will be determined by the
'particles' momentum.

'Particle' is in quotes because it is my assumption a photon is a
directed/pointed wave where the 'particle' is part of the wave and
consists of a very small region of the overall photon wave.

The photon 'particle' is detected as a quantum of matter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

"His 1924 doctoral thesis, Recherches sur la théorie des quanta
(Research on Quantum Theory), introduced his theory of electron waves.
This included the wave-particle duality theory of matter, based on
the work of Albert Einstein and Max Planck on light. The thesis
examiners, unsure of the material, passed his thesis to Einstein for
evaluation who endorsed his wave-particle duality proposal
wholeheartedly; de Broglie was awarded his doctorate. This research
culminated in the de Broglie hypothesis stating that any moving
particle or object had an associated wave. De Broglie thus created a
new field in physics, the mécanique ondulatoire, or wave mechanics,
uniting the physics of light and matter. For this he won the Nobel
Prize in Physics in 1929. Among the applications of this work has been
the development of electron microscopes to get much better image
resolution than optical ones, because of the shorter wavelengths of
electrons compared with photons.

In his later career, de Broglie worked to develop a causal explanation
of wave mechanics, in opposition to the wholly probabilistic models
which dominate quantum mechanical theory. Today, this explanation is
known as the de Broglie–Bohm theory, since it was refined by David
Bohm in the 1950s."

de Broglie was correct.
From: BURT on 1 Apr 2010 00:45
On Mar 31, 9:09 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 11:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> > > C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
> > > C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
> > > experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
> > > the available slits. >
>
> > The C60 molecule could easily be replaced with any other molecular
> > form and they will always have the exact same quantum macro aether
> > wave. Free electric particles can wave collapse taking the macro
> > aether wave with them.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> The C-60 molecule can be replaced by any 'particle', including a
> photon.
>
> Every moving physical 'particle' has an associated physical aether
> wave.
>
> The size of the associated aether wave will be determined by the
> 'particles' momentum.
>
> 'Particle' is in quotes because it is my assumption a photon is a
> directed/pointed wave where the 'particle' is part of the wave and
> consists of a very small region of the overall photon wave.
>
> The photon 'particle' is detected as a quantum of matter.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality
>
> "His 1924 doctoral thesis, Recherches sur la théorie des quanta
> (Research on Quantum Theory), introduced his theory of electron waves.
> This included the wave-particle duality  theory of matter, based on
> the work of Albert Einstein and Max Planck on light. The thesis
> examiners, unsure of the material, passed his thesis to Einstein for
> evaluation who endorsed his wave-particle duality proposal
> wholeheartedly; de Broglie was awarded his doctorate. This research
> culminated in the de Broglie hypothesis stating that any moving
> particle or object had an associated wave. De Broglie thus created a
> new field in physics, the mécanique ondulatoire, or wave mechanics,
> uniting the physics of light and matter. For this he won the Nobel
> Prize in Physics in 1929. Among the applications of this work has been
> the development of electron microscopes to get much better image
> resolution than optical ones, because of the shorter wavelengths of
> electrons compared with photons.
>
> In his later career, de Broglie worked to develop a causal explanation
> of wave mechanics, in opposition to the wholly probabilistic models
> which dominate quantum mechanical theory. Today, this explanation is
> known as the de Broglie–Bohm theory, since it was refined by David
> Bohm in the 1950s."
>
> de Broglie was correct.

The aether wave passes through two slits in an experiment but where in
nature does that same event happen? Where in nature is there two
slits?

Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 1 Apr 2010 00:49
On Mar 31, 11:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 30, 7:52 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > A C-60 molecule displaces the aether.
>
> > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> > C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
> > C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
> > experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
> > the available slits. >
>
> The C60 molecule could easily be replaced with any other molecular
> form and they will always have the exact same quantum macro aether
> wave. Free electric particles can wave collapse taking the macro
> aether wave with them.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

The C-60 molecule can be replaced by any 'particle', including a
photon.

Every moving physical 'particle' has an associated physical aether
wave.

The size of the associated aether wave will be determined by the
'particles' momentum.

'Particle' is in quotes because it is my assumption a photon is a
directed/pointed wave where the 'particle' is part of the wave and
consists of a very small region of the overall photon aether wave.

The photon 'particle' is detected as a quantum of matter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

"His 1924 doctoral thesis, Recherches sur la théorie des quanta
(Research on Quantum Theory), introduced his theory of electron waves.
This included the wave-particle duality theory of matter, based on
the work of Albert Einstein and Max Planck on light. The thesis
examiners, unsure of the material, passed his thesis to Einstein for
evaluation who endorsed his wave-particle duality proposal
wholeheartedly; de Broglie was awarded his doctorate. This research
culminated in the de Broglie hypothesis stating that any moving
particle or object had an associated wave. De Broglie thus created a
new field in physics, the mécanique ondulatoire, or wave mechanics,
uniting the physics of light and matter. For this he won the Nobel
Prize in Physics in 1929. Among the applications of this work has been
the development of electron microscopes to get much better image
resolution than optical ones, because of the shorter wavelengths of
electrons compared with photons.

In his later career, de Broglie worked to develop a causal explanation
of wave mechanics, in opposition to the wholly probabilistic models
which dominate quantum mechanical theory. Today, this explanation is
known as the de Broglie–Bohm theory, since it was refined by David
Bohm in the 1950s."

de Broglie was correct.
From: mpc755 on 1 Apr 2010 00:55
On Apr 1, 12:45 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 9:09 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 31, 11:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The
> > > > C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the wave. The
> > > > C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double slit
> > > > experiment. The associated aether displacement wave enters and exits
> > > > the available slits. >
>
> > > The C60 molecule could easily be replaced with any other molecular
> > > form and they will always have the exact same quantum macro aether
> > > wave. Free electric particles can wave collapse taking the macro
> > > aether wave with them.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > The C-60 molecule can be replaced by any 'particle', including a
> > photon.
>
> > Every moving physical 'particle' has an associated physical aether
> > wave.
>
> > The size of the associated aether wave will be determined by the
> > 'particles' momentum.
>
> > 'Particle' is in quotes because it is my assumption a photon is a
> > directed/pointed wave where the 'particle' is part of the wave and
> > consists of a very small region of the overall photon wave.
>
> > The photon 'particle' is detected as a quantum of matter.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality
>
> > "His 1924 doctoral thesis, Recherches sur la théorie des quanta
> > (Research on Quantum Theory), introduced his theory of electron waves.
> > This included the wave-particle duality  theory of matter, based on
> > the work of Albert Einstein and Max Planck on light. The thesis
> > examiners, unsure of the material, passed his thesis to Einstein for
> > evaluation who endorsed his wave-particle duality proposal
> > wholeheartedly; de Broglie was awarded his doctorate. This research
> > culminated in the de Broglie hypothesis stating that any moving
> > particle or object had an associated wave. De Broglie thus created a
> > new field in physics, the mécanique ondulatoire, or wave mechanics,
> > uniting the physics of light and matter. For this he won the Nobel
> > Prize in Physics in 1929. Among the applications of this work has been
> > the development of electron microscopes to get much better image
> > resolution than optical ones, because of the shorter wavelengths of
> > electrons compared with photons.
>
> > In his later career, de Broglie worked to develop a causal explanation
> > of wave mechanics, in opposition to the wholly probabilistic models
> > which dominate quantum mechanical theory. Today, this explanation is
> > known as the de Broglie–Bohm theory, since it was refined by David
> > Bohm in the 1950s."
>
> > de Broglie was correct.
>
> The aether wave passes through two slits in an experiment but where in
> nature does that same event happen? Where in nature is there two
> slits?
>
> Mitch Raemsch

You are confusing the ability of the photon to create an interference
pattern in a double slit experiment with the ability of the photon to
collapse and be detected as a quantum of matter.

In the photoelectric effect experiment, photons are physically
entering and occupying three dimensional space in the metal as quanta
of matter which causes electrons to be emitted.

When a photon enters your eye it collapses and is detected as a
quantum of matter. This quantum of matter then 'radiates as heat'.
What is occurring after the photon is detected as a quantum of matter
is there is still an aether wave but it 'dissipates'. Think of an
ocean wave which propagates through a channel and is 'detected' by a
bunch of buoys. The wave still exists but it 'dissipates'.

The aether wave 'dissipates' by interacting with matter which
generates heat.
From: ENTIKY05 on 1 Apr 2010 01:57
why is it incumbent upon me to "explain how
it can occur without aether?"

why are you so obsessed with Newtonmaia'a "photon?"

how can you explain *any* electromagnetic phenomenon,
such as permitivity & permeability, or antimatter,
with this allegedly needful aetherstuff?

why are not electrons in atoms & in plasmas sufficient
for electro-magnetism

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_Broglie

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.com
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Prev: LHC versus cranks : 1-0
Next: Higgs security