Aether Displacement
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: LHC versus cranks : 1-0
Next: Higgs security
From: mpc755 on 3 Apr 2010 20:40 On Apr 3, 8:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 5:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 3, 8:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 5:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 3, 4:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 3, 12:39 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 11:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > > > > > > > The wave nature of the electron > > > > > > > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > > > > > > > "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is > > > > > > > > carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer > > > > > > > > is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the > > > > > > > > interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular > > > > > > > > point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, > > > > > > > > that is to say the intensity at M."- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Probability can not be the basis. Wave aether causing fast and slow > > > > > > > speeds even rest for particles explains what we see without need of > > > > > > > probability. Probability is a lower order theory. And what would you > > > > > > > expect at that time of DeBroglie? > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > > > > > > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > > > > > > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > > > > > > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > > > > > > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > > > > > > interpretation" > > > > > > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > > > > > > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > > > > > > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > > > > > > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > > > > > > physical reality of waves and particles." > > > > > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > > > > > The wave nature of the electron > > > > > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > > > > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > > > > > > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > > > > > > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > > > > > > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > > > > > > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > > > > > > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.'- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > It is an aether wave not a probability wave. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > It's a physical wave not a wave-function. > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > > > > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > > > > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > > > > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > > > > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > > > > interpretation" > > > > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > > > > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > > > > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > > > > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > > > > physical reality of waves and particles." > > > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > > > The wave nature of the electron > > > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > > > > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > > > > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > > > > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > > > > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > > > > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.'- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Right. I do not use that math lingo of "function" but "probability" is > > > also a mathematical concept. Position is determined by how what we > > > detect is moving at the time. When fast it is found least often and > > > when slow more often and when at rest it will be found the most. > > > > Its an aether wave pushing energy vibration in two rates with an > > > exception I cannot mention here. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > When distinguishing Aether Displacement from the Copenhagen > > interpretation of QM the difference under discussion should be the > > physical aether wave vs. the wave-function. > > > de Broglie said it correctly, and so did the Editor. > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > The wave nature of the electron > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is > > carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer > > is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the > > interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular > > point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, > > that is to say the intensity at M." > > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.' > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > by the double solution theory > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > > interpretation" > > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > > physical reality of waves and particles."- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > I always maintain "aether wave substance" and no other description be > it a math function or a math probability. > > Mitch Raemsch Aether and matter are different states of the same material. My preferred concept of a photon is as a directed/pointed wave which is detected as a quantum of matter. When distinguishing Aether Displacement from the Copenhagen interpretation of QM the difference under discussion should be the physical aether wave vs. the wave-function. de Broglie said it correctly, and so did the Editor. 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE The wave nature of the electron Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929' http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, that is to say the intensity at M." 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.' 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen interpretation" "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles."
From: BURT on 3 Apr 2010 20:46 On Apr 3, 5:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 8:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 5:35 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 3, 8:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 3, 5:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 3, 4:15 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 12:39 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Apr 2, 11:37 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > > > > > > > > The wave nature of the electron > > > > > > > > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > > > > > > > > "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is > > > > > > > > > carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer > > > > > > > > > is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the > > > > > > > > > interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular > > > > > > > > > point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, > > > > > > > > > that is to say the intensity at M."- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Probability can not be the basis. Wave aether causing fast and slow > > > > > > > > speeds even rest for particles explains what we see without need of > > > > > > > > probability. Probability is a lower order theory. And what would you > > > > > > > > expect at that time of DeBroglie? > > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > > > > > > > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > > > > > > > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > > > > > > > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > > > > > > > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > > > > > > > interpretation" > > > > > > > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > > > > > > > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > > > > > > > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > > > > > > > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > > > > > > > physical reality of waves and particles." > > > > > > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > > > > > > The wave nature of the electron > > > > > > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > > > > > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > > > > > > > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > > > > > > > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > > > > > > > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > > > > > > > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > > > > > > > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.'- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > It is an aether wave not a probability wave. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > > > It's a physical wave not a wave-function. > > > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > > > by the double solution theory > > > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > > > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > > > > > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > > > > > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > > > > > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > > > > > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > > > > > interpretation" > > > > > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > > > > > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > > > > > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > > > > > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > > > > > physical reality of waves and particles." > > > > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > > > > The wave nature of the electron > > > > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > > > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > > > > > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > > > > > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > > > > > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > > > > > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > > > > > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.'- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Right. I do not use that math lingo of "function" but "probability" is > > > > also a mathematical concept. Position is determined by how what we > > > > detect is moving at the time. When fast it is found least often and > > > > when slow more often and when at rest it will be found the most. > > > > > Its an aether wave pushing energy vibration in two rates with an > > > > exception I cannot mention here. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > When distinguishing Aether Displacement from the Copenhagen > > > interpretation of QM the difference under discussion should be the > > > physical aether wave vs. the wave-function. > > > > de Broglie said it correctly, and so did the Editor. > > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > > The wave nature of the electron > > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > > "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is > > > carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer > > > is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the > > > interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular > > > point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, > > > that is to say the intensity at M." > > > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > > > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > > > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > > > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > > > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > > > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.' > > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > > by the double solution theory > > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001..pdf > > > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > > > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > > > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > > > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > > > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > > > interpretation" > > > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > > > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > > > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > > > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > > > physical reality of waves and particles."- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > I always maintain "aether wave substance" and no other description be > > it a math function or a math probability. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > > My preferred concept of a photon is as a directed/pointed wave which > is detected as a quantum of matter. > > When distinguishing Aether Displacement from the Copenhagen > interpretation of QM the difference under discussion should be the > physical aether wave vs. the wave-function. > > de Broglie said it correctly, and so did the Editor. > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > The wave nature of the electron > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is > carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer > is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the > interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular > point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, > that is to say the intensity at M." > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.' > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > by the double solution theory > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > interpretation" > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > physical reality of waves and particles."- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - There is an aether/energy matter relationship that we call time. These are two different substances that together make up time forms. Sameness needs to be balanced with the immutable difference of universal substances existing together. Light time form is the unified field or force. It is the Unified form of the universe. And its job is communication. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 3 Apr 2010 20:51 On Apr 3, 8:46 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > There is an aether/energy matter relationship that we call time. > These are two different substances that together make up time forms. > Sameness needs to be balanced with the immutable difference of > universal substances existing together. > > Light time form is the unified field or force. It is the Unified form > of the universe. And its job is communication. > Mitch Raemsch Time is a concept. The rate at which an atomic clock ticks has nothing to do with time. An atomic clock ticks based upon the aether pressure in which it exists. If you are on a space ship orbiting the Earth and an atomic clock ticks off 370 days and you determine by measurements against the stars one year has passed, how much time has passed? One year has passed. The Earth's orbit of the Sun is a more accurate clock then the rate at which an atomic clock ticks. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Aether and matter are different states of the same material. My preferred concept of a photon is as a directed/pointed wave which is detected as a quantum of matter. When distinguishing Aether Displacement from the Copenhagen interpretation of QM the difference under discussion should be the physical aether wave vs. the wave-function. de Broglie said it correctly, and so did the Editor. 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE The wave nature of the electron Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929' http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-lecture.pdf "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, that is to say the intensity at M." 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.' 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen interpretation" "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles."
From: BURT on 3 Apr 2010 20:59 On Apr 3, 5:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 8:46 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > There is an aether/energy matter relationship that we call time. > > These are two different substances that together make up time forms. > > Sameness needs to be balanced with the immutable difference of > > universal substances existing together. > > > Light time form is the unified field or force. It is the Unified form > > of the universe. And its job is communication. > > Mitch Raemsch > > Time is a concept. The rate at which an atomic clock ticks has nothing > to do with time. An atomic clock ticks based upon the aether pressure > in which it exists. If you are on a space ship orbiting the Earth and > an atomic clock ticks off 370 days and you determine by measurements > against the stars one year has passed, how much time has passed? One > year has passed. The Earth's orbit of the Sun is a more accurate clock > then the rate at which an atomic clock ticks. > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > > My preferred concept of a photon is as a directed/pointed wave which > is detected as a quantum of matter. > > When distinguishing Aether Displacement from the Copenhagen > interpretation of QM the difference under discussion should be the > physical aether wave vs. the wave-function. > > de Broglie said it correctly, and so did the Editor. > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > The wave nature of the electron > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is > carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer > is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the > interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular > point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, > that is to say the intensity at M." > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.' > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > by the double solution theory > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > interpretation" > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > physical reality of waves and particles." Aether and energy are immutable substances. Samess is wrong Unification except in the case of the Universal Light Form. Every part of light is unified with the other. The same cannot be said about matter. Mitch Raemsch Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 3 Apr 2010 21:01
On Apr 3, 8:59 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Apr 3, 5:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 3, 8:46 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > There is an aether/energy matter relationship that we call time. > > > These are two different substances that together make up time forms. > > > Sameness needs to be balanced with the immutable difference of > > > universal substances existing together. > > > > Light time form is the unified field or force. It is the Unified form > > > of the universe. And its job is communication. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Time is a concept. The rate at which an atomic clock ticks has nothing > > to do with time. An atomic clock ticks based upon the aether pressure > > in which it exists. If you are on a space ship orbiting the Earth and > > an atomic clock ticks off 370 days and you determine by measurements > > against the stars one year has passed, how much time has passed? One > > year has passed. The Earth's orbit of the Sun is a more accurate clock > > then the rate at which an atomic clock ticks. > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. > > > Aether and matter are different states of the same material. > > > My preferred concept of a photon is as a directed/pointed wave which > > is detected as a quantum of matter. > > > When distinguishing Aether Displacement from the Copenhagen > > interpretation of QM the difference under discussion should be the > > physical aether wave vs. the wave-function. > > > de Broglie said it correctly, and so did the Editor. > > > 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE > > The wave nature of the electron > > Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929'http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-le... > > > "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is > > carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer > > is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the > > interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular > > point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, > > that is to say the intensity at M." > > > 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A > > wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the > > waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive > > positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale > > mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which > > is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.' > > > 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics > > by the double solution theory > > Louis de BROGLIE'http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf > > > "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first > > lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe > > observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract > > mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected > > to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen > > interpretation" > > > "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was > > looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, > > of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in > > his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the > > physical reality of waves and particles." > > Aether and energy are immutable substances. Samess is wrong > Unification except in the case of the Universal Light Form. Every part > of light is unified with the other. The same cannot be said about > matter. > > Mitch Raemsch > > Mitch Raemsch Aether and matter are different states of the same material. Matter is compressed aether and aether is uncompressed matter. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. My preferred concept of a photon is as a directed/pointed wave which is detected as a quantum of matter. When distinguishing Aether Displacement from the Copenhagen interpretation of QM the difference under discussion should be the physical aether wave vs. the wave-function. de Broglie said it correctly, and so did the Editor. 'LOUIS DE BROGLIE The wave nature of the electron Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1929' http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1929/broglie-lecture.pdf "I must restrict myself to the assertion that when an observation is carried out enabling the localization of the corpuscle, the observer is invariably induced to assign to the corpuscle a position in the interior of the wave and the probability of it being at a particular point M of the wave is proportional to the square of the amplitude, that is to say the intensity at M." 'To sum up the meaning of wave mechanics it can be stated that: "A wave must be associated with each corpuscle and only the study of the waves propagation will yield information to us on the successive positions of the corpuscle in space". In conventional large-scale mechanical phenomena the anticipated positions lie along a curve which is the trajectory in the conventional meaning of the word.' 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory Louis de BROGLIE' http://www.ensmp.fr/aflb/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf "EDITOR'S Note...But Louis de Broglie, as he explains in the first lines of his article, was a realist, and he could not believe observable physical phenomena to only follow from abstract mathematical wave-functions. Somehow, these latter had to be connected to real waves, at variance with the prevailing Copenhagen interpretation" "When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics [1] I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles." |