From: nospam on
In article <C8511198.4920F%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com>, George Kerby
<ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> The TSA goons really hassle you if you have any sort of implants as well. I
> can't wait until the full body scanners are installed everywhere. If
> anything else, it will make my travels a lot smoother.

the body scanners will result in a *lot* more hassles, invasive
procedures and humiliation. worse, they're slower and they don't detect
explosives. it's actually *easier* to slip something through.
From: VAXman- on
In article <michelle-1A4B93.13460530062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> writes:
>In article <00A9FBEF.CA00314E(a)SendSpamHere.ORG>,
> VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
>
>> I have one. Under older version of OS X you could also maintain
>> multiple profiles for quick configuration. This feature went missing
>> with 10.5.?
>
>I has nothing to do with the OS version, but everything to do with the
>version of Airport Utility, and the current one has this feature.

Current one? Meaning the one in SL? I'm still back on Leopard because
my Bayer glucometer won't work with SL.

--
VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)ORG

All your spirit rack abuses, come to haunt you back by day.
All your Byzantine excuses, given time, given you away.
From: George Kerby on



On 6/30/10 3:27 PM, in article 300620101327229033%nospam(a)nospam.invalid,
"nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <C8511198.4920F%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com>, George Kerby
> <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The TSA goons really hassle you if you have any sort of implants as well. I
>> can't wait until the full body scanners are installed everywhere. If
>> anything else, it will make my travels a lot smoother.
>
> the body scanners will result in a *lot* more hassles, invasive
> procedures and humiliation. worse, they're slower and they don't detect
> explosives. it's actually *easier* to slip something through.

Sorry, you are wrong. Most likely you never have been through the Tulsa
airport, or any of the several test installations around the country. For
me, and others who have to endure the 10 - 15 pat down delay every time I
travel, it is a blessing. Wouldn't know about you, but I get tired of some
geezer sticking his hands down my pants at the airport and having an
audience watching.

BTW: What's in YOUR wallet, pants, belt, shoes, watch, rings, jewelry,
glasses, etc., etc., etc.

You might find this enlightening if your mind is open...

<http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Full-body_scanners_at_a
irports>

From: Justin on
In article <C850EAA1.49125%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com>,
George Kerby <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/30/10 8:26 AM, in article 00A9FBBE.BC83D035(a)SendSpamHere.ORG, "VAXman-
> @SendSpamHere.ORG" <VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG> wrote:
>
> > In article <michelle-6AC190.04572430062010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>,
> > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> writes:
> >> In article <i0eicp$64s$4(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
> >> Justin <justin(a)nobecauseihatespam.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> One in each room.
> >>> Some of us arrive/leave before the others.
> >>
> >> You can afford expensive hotels in separate rooms. You can afford to
> >> travel to other countries. You can afford to do this multiple times a
> >> year. But you're too cheap to pay $15/day each for internet access?
> >
> > Others have said the same... this has to be a troll.
>
> To be frank (not THAT Frank), maybe he should build that little extra
> expense into his fee(s) that he charges to whomever he provides the
> services?

Great idea!
Then we can lose customers to competitors.
Check my header please - some of us use more than one OS.
From: Justin on
In article <300620101327229033%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>,
nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <C8511198.4920F%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com>, George Kerby
> <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The TSA goons really hassle you if you have any sort of implants as well. I
> > can't wait until the full body scanners are installed everywhere. If
> > anything else, it will make my travels a lot smoother.
>
> the body scanners will result in a *lot* more hassles, invasive
> procedures and humiliation. worse, they're slower and they don't detect
> explosives. it's actually *easier* to slip something through.

I actually look forward to the body scans.
Its what nature gave me.