Are Electric Fields Distrorted By Gravity? [Physics]

Prev: Relativistic "Doppler" shift, and why bp hates cap&trade derivatives [*], if they do.
Next: Proposed experiment for detection of absolute motion, and whether Murdoch/bp hate Captain Tax derivatives [*], re "climategate controversy."

From: mpc755 on 6 Aug 2010 15:50

On Aug 6, 3:23 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Please keep account of the quantity of claims that you make.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

A moving particle has an associated dark matter displacement wave. In
a double slit experiment, the particle travels a single path and
enters and exits a single slit. The associated dark matter
displacement wave enters and exits multiple slits. The dark matter
displacement wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which
alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle
causes decoherence of the associated dark matter displacement wave
(i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference.

Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material.
Dark matter is displaced by matter.
Dark matter is not at rest when displaced.
Dark matter displaced by matter exerts pressure towards the matter.
Pressure exerted by displaced dark matter towards matter is gravity.

Maxwell's displacement current is dark matter displacement.

'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?'
A. EINSTEIN
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

"If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass
diminishes by L/c2."

Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. The
mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists
as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter.
As matter converts to dark matter it expands in three dimensional
space. The physical effects this transition has on the neighboring
dark matter and matter is energy.

Mass is conserved.

From: PD on 6 Aug 2010 17:08

On Aug 6, 2:47 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 6, 9:49 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 6, 10:41 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Henri, Mike Cavedon is tired of replying to himself, and so he's
> > > > > > > > baiting anybody who will bite. His only regular conversation partner
> > > > > > > > is a homeless guy who thinks he won two Nobel Prizes last year.
>
> > > > > > > You have never answered if the ripple reaches the Earth and if not
> > > > > > > then why not?
>
> > > > > > And I've told you the reason why I don't answer your questions. Do you
> > > > > > remember the reason? Does it make sense to you?
>
> > > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not?
>
> > > > > Why won't you answer such a simple question?
>
> > > > I've already told you why I don't give YOU an answer to this simple
> > > > question. Why can you not remember or absorb that simple reason?
>
> > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not?
>
> > > Why won't you answer such a simple question?
>
> > Well, it's plain you cannot absorb the simple reason you aren't given
> > answers.
> > And so your only recourse is to repeat your question, which of course
> > further exacerbates the reason you aren't given answers.
>
> > Einstein did have an insight about this that you can quote, since
> > you're fond of quoting him:
> > "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
> > different results."
>
> > PD
>
>
> Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not?
>
> Why won't you answer such a simple question?
>

Sorry, I don't answer even simple questions for people who are
obviously insane.

From: mpc755 on 6 Aug 2010 20:55

On Aug 6, 5:08 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2:47 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 6, 2:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 6, 9:49 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Aug 6, 10:41 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Henri, Mike Cavedon is tired of replying to himself, and so he's
> > > > > > > > > baiting anybody who will bite. His only regular conversation partner
> > > > > > > > > is a homeless guy who thinks he won two Nobel Prizes last year.
>
> > > > > > > > You have never answered if the ripple reaches the Earth and if not
> > > > > > > > then why not?
>
> > > > > > > And I've told you the reason why I don't answer your questions. Do you
> > > > > > > remember the reason? Does it make sense to you?
>
> > > > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not?
>
> > > > > > Why won't you answer such a simple question?
>
> > > > > I've already told you why I don't give YOU an answer to this simple
> > > > > question. Why can you not remember or absorb that simple reason?
>
> > > > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not?
>
> > > > Why won't you answer such a simple question?
>
> > > Well, it's plain you cannot absorb the simple reason you aren't given
> > > answers.
> > > And so your only recourse is to repeat your question, which of course
> > > further exacerbates the reason you aren't given answers.
>
> > > Einstein did have an insight about this that you can quote, since
> > > you're fond of quoting him:
> > > "Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
> > > different results."
>
> > > PD
>
> > Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not?
>
> > Why won't you answer such a simple question?
>
> Sorry, I don't answer even simple questions for people who are
> obviously insane.

Does the ripple eventually reach the Earth and if not then why not?

Why won't you answer such a simple question?

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASAs Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view
of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two
galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is
somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the
water."

The ripple will eventually reach the Earth and this is evidence dark
matter exists from the galaxy cluster to the Earth. This is evidence
dark matter is the medium of space in which light waves propagate.

A moving particle has an associated dark matter displacement wave. In
a double slit experiment, the particle travels a single path and
enters and exits a single slit. The associated dark matter
displacement wave enters and exits multiple slits. The dark matter
displacement wave creates interference upon exiting the slits which
alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle
causes decoherence of the associated dark matter displacement wave
(i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference.

Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material.
Dark matter is displaced by matter.
Dark matter is not at rest when displaced.
Dark matter displaced by matter exerts pressure towards the matter.
Pressure exerted by displaced dark matter towards matter is gravity.

Maxwell's displacement current is dark matter displacement.

'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?'
A. EINSTEIN
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf

"If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass
diminishes by L/c2."

Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. The
mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists
as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter.
As matter converts to dark matter it expands in three dimensional
space. The physical effects this transition has on the neighboring
dark matter and matter is energy.

Mass is conserved.

From: Edward Green on 8 Aug 2010 15:53

On Aug 5, 10:01 am, dlzc <dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> Dear Henry Wilson DSc:
>
> On Aug 4, 3:29 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:04:16 -0700 (PDT),dlzc<dl...(a)cox.net> wrote:
> ...
> > >Note that materials affect electric (permittivity
> > >is pretty constant but not exactly so) and magnetic
> > >(ferro-, para- and dia-magnetism) fields
> > >differently than there mass would otherwise
> > >indicate.
>
> > >I had hoped you would have asked if measurements
> > >had been done to establish how those fields are
> > >altered by "elevation" in a g field (as opposed
> > >to "horizontal" distance). That would be
> > >interesting...
>
> > At least you are taking the question seriously
>
> Except for your massive leap from "do these fields deform" to "they
> must be the cause of gravitation".
>
> > even if you don't have any answers...
>
> I had an answer. The answer is, your conclusion doesn't follow, as my
> jello example showed.

I am reminded of irreversible thermo, though: if a gradient in A
drives a flux in B, the converse is often true. Or maybe always true.
(I'm not sure now if this is a theorem or a hypothesis). Obviously
your jello example doesn't quite fit this mold.

From: Henry Wilson DSc on 8 Aug 2010 18:59

On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 15:11:09 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Aug 8, 5:00�pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 17:03:59 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Aug 7, 5:13�pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 05:51:32 -0700 (PDT), PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>>
>> there are none.
>
>As I said...
>
>>
>> >This is religious fervor -- paying attention only to those things that
>> >support what you want to believe.
>>
>> You should know all about religious fervour, diaper.
>
>On the contrary, I like documented, corroborated, published results.
>To you, that means nothing.
>
>That's what marks what you do as religious fervor. Own it, Henry.

there is not one piece of evidence that cannot be explained by BaTh.

Henry Wilson...

........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.