Can a *single** physical entity- be* at the same time* - in two **separated* locations ??!!
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Liquid Water has solid-like behaviour over long-distances andtime-frames
Next: Very cheap solar power
From: Y.Porat on 31 Jan 2010 14:44 On Jan 31, 9:29 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 12:25 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 31, 6:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 30, 3:27 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 30, 6:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 30, 10:40 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 2:47 pm, mpc755 < > > > > > > > > > -------------------- > > > > > > > > did anyone ever detected Aether?? > > > > > > > > > on the other hand > > > > > > > > i heard rumors that > > > > > > > > elcrons were detected and their properties were defined > > > > > > > > and so about photons > > > > > > > > > we can do physics only on detected entities > > > > > > > > the rest is guesses > > > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > > > i think that current physics > > > > > > > > can do well without Aether > > > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > > > It doesn't do well without aether. Just look at this thread. A photon > > > > > > > is either a directed/pointed wave in the aether or it is a moving > > > > > > > 'particle' with an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > With this understanding of nature, you have the 'particle' traveling a > > > > > > > single path and the associated wave propagating available paths. The > > > > > > > 'particle' enters and exits a single slit and the associated wave > > > > > > > propagates through the available slits. The wave exits the slits and > > > > > > > creates interference and the direction the 'particle' travels is > > > > > > > altered. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference. > > > > > > > > That is why I have on several occasions asked you what you think is > > > > > > > occurring in a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule. The C-60 > > > > > > > molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The analogy is > > > > > > > the bow wave a boat makes. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single > > > > > > > slit and the displacement wave it creates in the aether enters and > > > > > > > exits multiple slits. When the aether wave exits the slits it creates > > > > > > > interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. > > > > > > > Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > aether wave and there is no interference. > > > > > > > > With aether, de Broglie's statement of a moving particle has an > > > > > > > associated wave becomes a moving 'particle' has an associated aether > > > > > > > wave and if you know the particle consists of matter, the moving > > > > > > > particle has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > > > > > With this understanding of nature, this thread is unnecessary.. > > > > > > > > > if our Universe is expanding > > > > > > > > what happens to the **density* of Aether ??!! > > > > > > > > > Y.Porat > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > > > > > > > you ddint answer my questions > > > > > > > 1 > > > > > > did anyone ever detected Aether?? > > > > > > Yes. The aether is detected in every double slit experiment. The > > > > > observed behaviors in a double slit experiment are due to the > > > > > 'particle' traveling a single path and the associated aether wave > > > > > propagating available paths. > > > > > > The search for gravity waves is the search for aether displacement > > > > > waves. > > > > > > The pressure associated with aether displaced by massive objects is > > > > > gravity, so the fact that you are presently effected by gravity > > > > > evidence of aether. > > > > > > The fact that light reaches the Earth is evidence of aether. > > > > > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > > > > > "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is > > > > > unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation > > > > > of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space > > > > > and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time > > > > > intervals in the physical sense." > > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > if our Universe is expanding ... > > > > > > what happens to the **density** of you Aether ?? > > > > > > The universe is not expanding. The matter which we see in our > > > > > telescopes is moving away from us, but the universe as a whole is not > > > > > expanding. > > > > > > The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. > > > > > > Now it is your turn. What is physically occurring in nature in a > > > > > double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule? > > > > > ---------------------- > > > > --1 > > > > does a single C-60 is inyefering with itself ?? > > > > i ddint check it > > > > please show me a link that proves that > > > > C 60 is interfering with itself > > > > even if yest > > > > it is not an atom it is a MOLECULE . > > > > and surely subdivided !! > > > > 'Wave-particle duality seen in carbon-60 molecules'http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2952 > > > > If the molecule is subdivided and enters and exits multiple slits then > > > how is it if detectors are placed at the exits to the slits the > > > instant before the C-60 molecule exits the slits, the C-60 molecule is > > > always detected exiting a single slit? > > > > How does the C-60 molecule go from traveling through all of the > > > available slits to exiting a single slit if detectors are placed at > > > the exits to the slits the instant prior to the C-60 molecule exiting > > > all of the available slits? > > > > > 2 > > > > if yess > > > > the C 60 has as you say 60 Atoms!! > > > > not a single one > > > > how do you know that it was passing and remained with 60 Atoms > > > > may be it got out with 30 of them > > > > may be with 59 ? > > > > may be it was two molecules > > > > In any double slit experiment, the particle is ALWAYS detected exiting > > > a single slit no matter when the detectors are placed at the exits. > > > > Explain how this is possible if there are six slits and 10 atoms which > > > make up the C-60 molecule are traveling through each slit? > > > > How is it that all 60 atoms are always detected exiting a single slit? > > > > How is it the C-60 molecule is always detected as a self-contained > > > entity exiting a single slit no matter when the detectors are placed > > > at the exits? > > > > I'll tell you why, because the C-60 molecule always enters and exits a > > > single slit and it is the displacement wave the C-60 molecule creates > > > in the aether which propagates through all of the slits. > > > > > 3 > > > > how do you knoe it was a single molecule of C60 > > > > and not two of them ?? two C 60 ?? > > > > If you think an experiment cannot be performed where one C-60 molecule > > > at a time is known to exist in the experiment you are delusional. > > > ------------------- > > if you speak about the carbon molecule > > that is building our body > > that is another opera > > but a big but: > > please dont forgetthat the Carbon that we know > > from our every daylife > > > HAS A VAST RANGE OF WAVE SPECTRUM > > > it is *no*t a single photon or not even a single electron .. > > > and if it radioactive as well-- as the isotopes of C 12 > > it is again not a single physical entity > > > it that case it is actually spreading and spraying around it > > electrons neutrons etc and even em waves > > > so again it is ***not** 'a single physical entity'' > > that i was referring in my OP post !!! > > it is a completely different Opera ! > > > and the main point for you : > > **it has nothing to do with Aether** > > we can live nicely in that case > > without Aether !! > > > ATB > > Y.Porat > > ---------------------------- > > Why can't you answer the question I am proposing? > > If the C-60 molecule, 60 interconnected atoms, is not a single > physical entity, which I am assuming you mean it enters all of the > available slits, how is the C-60 molecule ALWAYS detected exiting a > single slit if detectors are placed at the exits the instant prior to > the C-60 molecule exiting the slits? > > How does the C-60 molecule go from propagating through all of the > slits to being detected as a single, self-contained, C-60 molecule if > detectors are placed at the exits the instant prior to the C-60 > molecule exiting the slits? > > Since you are unable or unwilling to answer this question, I will > answer it for you. The C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in > the aether and the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit while > the displacement wave the C-60 molecule creates in the aether enters > and exits the available slits. When the C-60 molecule exits the slits > it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule > travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the > associated aether displacement wave (i.e. the wave is turned into > chop) and there is no interference and the direction the C-60 molecule > travels is not altered. ---------------- common will you tel me - and exactly once and for all what is that C-60 molecule?? if it is composedof a few Carbon or carbon isotope as we know from conventional science or is it an invention of yours **including Aether !! i must know the facts before answering please answer quick before i am going to sleep (it seems that i am living at the other side of this globe (:-)) TIA Y.Porat
From: mpc755 on 31 Jan 2010 15:07 On Jan 31, 2:44 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 9:29 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 31, 12:25 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 6:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 30, 3:27 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 30, 6:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 10:40 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan 30, 2:47 pm, mpc755 < > > > > > > > > > > -------------------- > > > > > > > > > did anyone ever detected Aether?? > > > > > > > > > > on the other hand > > > > > > > > > i heard rumors that > > > > > > > > > elcrons were detected and their properties were defined > > > > > > > > > and so about photons > > > > > > > > > > we can do physics only on detected entities > > > > > > > > > the rest is guesses > > > > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > > > > i think that current physics > > > > > > > > > can do well without Aether > > > > > > > > > 3 > > > > > > > > > It doesn't do well without aether. Just look at this thread.. A photon > > > > > > > > is either a directed/pointed wave in the aether or it is a moving > > > > > > > > 'particle' with an associated aether wave. > > > > > > > > > With this understanding of nature, you have the 'particle' traveling a > > > > > > > > single path and the associated wave propagating available paths. The > > > > > > > > 'particle' enters and exits a single slit and the associated wave > > > > > > > > propagates through the available slits. The wave exits the slits and > > > > > > > > creates interference and the direction the 'particle' travels is > > > > > > > > altered. Detecting the 'particle' causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > wave and there is no interference. > > > > > > > > > That is why I have on several occasions asked you what you think is > > > > > > > > occurring in a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule. The C-60 > > > > > > > > molecule has an associated aether displacement wave. The analogy is > > > > > > > > the bow wave a boat makes. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single > > > > > > > > slit and the displacement wave it creates in the aether enters and > > > > > > > > exits multiple slits. When the aether wave exits the slits it creates > > > > > > > > interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. > > > > > > > > Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the associated > > > > > > > > aether wave and there is no interference. > > > > > > > > > With aether, de Broglie's statement of a moving particle has an > > > > > > > > associated wave becomes a moving 'particle' has an associated aether > > > > > > > > wave and if you know the particle consists of matter, the moving > > > > > > > > particle has an associated aether displacement wave. > > > > > > > > > With this understanding of nature, this thread is unnecessary. > > > > > > > > > > if our Universe is expanding > > > > > > > > > what happens to the **density* of Aether ??!! > > > > > > > > > > Y.Porat > > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > > > > > > > > you ddint answer my questions > > > > > > > > 1 > > > > > > > did anyone ever detected Aether?? > > > > > > > Yes. The aether is detected in every double slit experiment. The > > > > > > observed behaviors in a double slit experiment are due to the > > > > > > 'particle' traveling a single path and the associated aether wave > > > > > > propagating available paths. > > > > > > > The search for gravity waves is the search for aether displacement > > > > > > waves. > > > > > > > The pressure associated with aether displaced by massive objects is > > > > > > gravity, so the fact that you are presently effected by gravity > > > > > > evidence of aether. > > > > > > > The fact that light reaches the Earth is evidence of aether. > > > > > > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > > > > > > "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is > > > > > > unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation > > > > > > of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space > > > > > > and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time > > > > > > intervals in the physical sense." > > > > > > > > 2 > > > > > > > if our Universe is expanding ... > > > > > > > what happens to the **density** of you Aether ?? > > > > > > > The universe is not expanding. The matter which we see in our > > > > > > telescopes is moving away from us, but the universe as a whole is not > > > > > > expanding. > > > > > > > The universe is, or the local universe is in, a jet stream. > > > > > > > Now it is your turn. What is physically occurring in nature in a > > > > > > double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule? > > > > > > ---------------------- > > > > > --1 > > > > > does a single C-60 is inyefering with itself ?? > > > > > i ddint check it > > > > > please show me a link that proves that > > > > > C 60 is interfering with itself > > > > > even if yest > > > > > it is not an atom it is a MOLECULE . > > > > > and surely subdivided !! > > > > > 'Wave-particle duality seen in carbon-60 molecules'http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2952 > > > > > If the molecule is subdivided and enters and exits multiple slits then > > > > how is it if detectors are placed at the exits to the slits the > > > > instant before the C-60 molecule exits the slits, the C-60 molecule is > > > > always detected exiting a single slit? > > > > > How does the C-60 molecule go from traveling through all of the > > > > available slits to exiting a single slit if detectors are placed at > > > > the exits to the slits the instant prior to the C-60 molecule exiting > > > > all of the available slits? > > > > > > 2 > > > > > if yess > > > > > the C 60 has as you say 60 Atoms!! > > > > > not a single one > > > > > how do you know that it was passing and remained with 60 Atoms > > > > > may be it got out with 30 of them > > > > > may be with 59 ? > > > > > may be it was two molecules > > > > > In any double slit experiment, the particle is ALWAYS detected exiting > > > > a single slit no matter when the detectors are placed at the exits. > > > > > Explain how this is possible if there are six slits and 10 atoms which > > > > make up the C-60 molecule are traveling through each slit? > > > > > How is it that all 60 atoms are always detected exiting a single slit? > > > > > How is it the C-60 molecule is always detected as a self-contained > > > > entity exiting a single slit no matter when the detectors are placed > > > > at the exits? > > > > > I'll tell you why, because the C-60 molecule always enters and exits a > > > > single slit and it is the displacement wave the C-60 molecule creates > > > > in the aether which propagates through all of the slits. > > > > > > 3 > > > > > how do you knoe it was a single molecule of C60 > > > > > and not two of them ?? two C 60 ?? > > > > > If you think an experiment cannot be performed where one C-60 molecule > > > > at a time is known to exist in the experiment you are delusional. > > > > ------------------- > > > if you speak about the carbon molecule > > > that is building our body > > > that is another opera > > > but a big but: > > > please dont forgetthat the Carbon that we know > > > from our every daylife > > > > HAS A VAST RANGE OF WAVE SPECTRUM > > > > it is *no*t a single photon or not even a single electron .. > > > > and if it radioactive as well-- as the isotopes of C 12 > > > it is again not a single physical entity > > > > it that case it is actually spreading and spraying around it > > > electrons neutrons etc and even em waves > > > > so again it is ***not** 'a single physical entity'' > > > that i was referring in my OP post !!! > > > it is a completely different Opera ! > > > > and the main point for you : > > > **it has nothing to do with Aether** > > > we can live nicely in that case > > > without Aether !! > > > > ATB > > > Y.Porat > > > ---------------------------- > > > Why can't you answer the question I am proposing? > > > If the C-60 molecule, 60 interconnected atoms, is not a single > > physical entity, which I am assuming you mean it enters all of the > > available slits, how is the C-60 molecule ALWAYS detected exiting a > > single slit if detectors are placed at the exits the instant prior to > > the C-60 molecule exiting the slits? > > > How does the C-60 molecule go from propagating through all of the > > slits to being detected as a single, self-contained, C-60 molecule if > > detectors are placed at the exits the instant prior to the C-60 > > molecule exiting the slits? > > > Since you are unable or unwilling to answer this question, I will > > answer it for you. The C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in > > the aether and the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit while > > the displacement wave the C-60 molecule creates in the aether enters > > and exits the available slits. When the C-60 molecule exits the slits > > it creates interference which alters the direction the C-60 molecule > > travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence of the > > associated aether displacement wave (i.e. the wave is turned into > > chop) and there is no interference and the direction the C-60 molecule > > travels is not altered. > > ---------------- > common > will you tel me - and exactly once and for all > what is that C-60 molecule?? > > if it is composedof a few Carbon or carbon isotope as we know from > conventional science > or is it an invention of yours > **including Aether !! > i must know the facts before answering > please answer quick before i am going to sleep > > (it seems that i am living at the other side of this globe (:-)) > > TIA > Y.Porat You should be able to look-up and figure out what a C-60 molecule is on your own, but I will answer it for you: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/blobchaser/Graphics/AC3D/MetaC60.jpg
From: Y.Porat on 31 Jan 2010 15:44 On Jan 31, 10:07 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2:44 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 9:29 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 12:25 pm, "Y decoherence of the > > > associated aether displacement wave (i.e. the wave is turned into > > > chop) and there is no interference and the direction the C-60 molecule > > > travels is not altered. > > > ---------------- > > common > > will you tel me - and exactly once and for all > > what is that C-60 molecule?? > > > if it is composedof a few Carbon or carbon isotope as we know from > > conventional science > > or is it an invention of yours > > **including Aether !! > > i must know the facts before answering > > please answer quick before i am going to sleep > > > (it seems that i am living at the other side of this globe (:-)) > > > TIA > > Y.Porat > > You should be able to look-up and figure out what a C-60 molecule is > on your own, but I will answer it for you: > > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/blobchaser/Graphics/AC3D/MetaC60.jpg ---------------------- ok but still there are some questions about it i understand thatit is a huge molecule of Carbon 12 right? 2 still not clear if it is net C 12 or there is some of them C 13 or C 14 etc?? anyway there is something you dont get; the real physical entity that is interfering withitself is WHILE TH EENTITY IS PASSING THROUGH BOTH SLITS EQUALLY iow it is exactly the same entity that pased through left sliy and right slit it is NOT different entities in each slit 2 i am talking about a single physical entity not a multi entiry that is sub divided ! and you tell me a completely differnt story you youself say that the C60 is mpassing only through ONE slit and that is excactly my claijm against the alleged entity passing through the *two* slits so you actually confirm my claim !! 3 while you deal with 60 Atoms why wonder that it is acompanied by a quite big 'vail' or sub entites like eelctrons may be even neutrons and MAINLY A WHOLE 'AMY' of EM waives those company escorting the main C 60 -- waves are known physical entities you a enot discovering anything new but it is not your Aether so all those accompanied entities can pass the other slit as well no big deal or innovation but it is not our OP subject (issue ) we deal with a single (alleged single) entity that is alleged to pass** evenly** at the two slits (it is not the case you brought ) and it is not your spooky Aether !! is it clear enough at last ?? ATB Y.Porat --------------------
From: mpc755 on 31 Jan 2010 16:00 On Jan 31, 3:44 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 10:07 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 31, 2:44 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 9:29 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 31, 12:25 pm, "Y decoherence of the > > > > associated aether displacement wave (i.e. the wave is turned into > > > > chop) and there is no interference and the direction the C-60 molecule > > > > travels is not altered. > > > > ---------------- > > > common > > > will you tel me - and exactly once and for all > > > what is that C-60 molecule?? > > > > if it is composedof a few Carbon or carbon isotope as we know from > > > conventional science > > > or is it an invention of yours > > > **including Aether !! > > > i must know the facts before answering > > > please answer quick before i am going to sleep > > > > (it seems that i am living at the other side of this globe (:-)) > > > > TIA > > > Y.Porat > > > You should be able to look-up and figure out what a C-60 molecule is > > on your own, but I will answer it for you: > > >http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/blobchaser/Graphics/AC3D/MetaC60.jpg > > ---------------------- > ok but still there are some questions about it > i understand thatit is a huge molecule of Carbon 12 > right? > 2 > still not clear if it is net C 12 > or there is some of them C 13 or C 14 etc?? > anyway > there is something you dont get; > > the real physical entity that is interfering withitself is > WHILE TH EENTITY IS PASSING THROUGH > BOTH SLITS EQUALLY > iow > it is exactly the same entity that pased through > left sliy and right slit > it is NOT > different entities in each slit > 2 > i am talking about a single physical entity > not a multi entiry that is sub divided ! > and you tell me a completely differnt story > you youself say that the C60 is mpassing only through > ONE slit > and that is excactly my claijm against the alleged entity > passing through the *two* slits > so you actually confirm my claim !! > 3 > while you deal with 60 Atoms why wonder that it is acompanied by a > quite big 'vail' or sub entites like eelctrons > may be even neutrons > and MAINLY A WHOLE 'AMY' of EM waives > > those company escorting the main C 60 -- waves are known physical > entities you a enot discovering anything new > but it is not your Aether > so > all those accompanied entities can pass the other slit as well > no big deal or innovation > > but it is not our OP subject (issue ) > we deal with a single (alleged single) entity > that is alleged to pass** evenly** at the two slits > (it is not the case you brought ) > > and > it is not your spooky Aether !! > > is it clear enough at last ?? > > ATB > Y.Porat > -------------------- It is not clear at all. You still are unable or unwilling to answer how it is the C-60 molecule is able to be detected exiting a single slit when detectors are placed at the exits to the slits the instant prior to the C-60 molecule exiting the slit(s). The C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether and it is the displacement wave which enters and exits the available slits while the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit.
From: mpc755 on 31 Jan 2010 16:03
On Jan 31, 4:00 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 3:44 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 31, 10:07 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 31, 2:44 pm, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 31, 9:29 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 31, 12:25 pm, "Y decoherence of the > > > > > associated aether displacement wave (i.e. the wave is turned into > > > > > chop) and there is no interference and the direction the C-60 molecule > > > > > travels is not altered. > > > > > ---------------- > > > > common > > > > will you tel me - and exactly once and for all > > > > what is that C-60 molecule?? > > > > > if it is composedof a few Carbon or carbon isotope as we know from > > > > conventional science > > > > or is it an invention of yours > > > > **including Aether !! > > > > i must know the facts before answering > > > > please answer quick before i am going to sleep > > > > > (it seems that i am living at the other side of this globe (:-)) > > > > > TIA > > > > Y.Porat > > > > You should be able to look-up and figure out what a C-60 molecule is > > > on your own, but I will answer it for you: > > > >http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/blobchaser/Graphics/AC3D/MetaC60.jpg > > > ---------------------- > > ok but still there are some questions about it > > i understand thatit is a huge molecule of Carbon 12 > > right? > > 2 > > still not clear if it is net C 12 > > or there is some of them C 13 or C 14 etc?? > > anyway > > there is something you dont get; > > > the real physical entity that is interfering withitself is > > WHILE TH EENTITY IS PASSING THROUGH > > BOTH SLITS EQUALLY > > iow > > it is exactly the same entity that pased through > > left sliy and right slit > > it is NOT > > different entities in each slit > > 2 > > i am talking about a single physical entity > > not a multi entiry that is sub divided ! > > and you tell me a completely differnt story > > you youself say that the C60 is mpassing only through > > ONE slit > > and that is excactly my claijm against the alleged entity > > passing through the *two* slits > > so you actually confirm my claim !! > > 3 > > while you deal with 60 Atoms why wonder that it is acompanied by a > > quite big 'vail' or sub entites like eelctrons > > may be even neutrons > > and MAINLY A WHOLE 'AMY' of EM waives > > > those company escorting the main C 60 -- waves are known physical > > entities you a enot discovering anything new > > but it is not your Aether > > so > > all those accompanied entities can pass the other slit as well > > no big deal or innovation > > > but it is not our OP subject (issue ) > > we deal with a single (alleged single) entity > > that is alleged to pass** evenly** at the two slits > > (it is not the case you brought ) > > > and > > it is not your spooky Aether !! > > > is it clear enough at last ?? > > > ATB > > Y.Porat > > -------------------- > > It is not clear at all. You still are unable or unwilling to answer > how it is the C-60 molecule is able to be detected exiting a single > slit when detectors are placed at the exits to the slits the instant > prior to the C-60 molecule exiting the slit(s). > > The C-60 molecule creates a displacement wave in the aether and it is > the displacement wave which enters and exits the available slits while > the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit. If you are saying the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit, what is allowing the C-60 molecule to create an interference pattern? What exits the other slits, or all of the slits in order for interference to occur? It is the displacement wave the C-60 molecule creates in the aether which creates interference upon exiting the slits which alters the direction the C-60 molecule travels. If in your understanding of a double slit experiment with a C-60 molecule, if the C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit, and nothing exits the other slits, how is there interference? |