Centralised MsgBox
in [Visual Basic]
|
Prev: crack for VSFlex8 in VB6.0
Next: Component Handles
From: Mike Williams on 10 Oct 2009 15:54 "Scott M." <s-mar(a)nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:%23%23gaSwcSKHA.4704(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > If anyting Mike, we know you can't read What a silly thing to say. > so I'm not at all surprised that you couldn't find any of > the numerous posts I've made in many of the .NET groups. I didn't look in the .NET groups. I was responding to one of your troll posts in the Classic VB group. When I said that I had just been through your posts here for the last three months I was referring to the Classic VB newsgroup, where you very rarely post any helpful reponses to programming questions and where almost all of your posts are those of a troll. My response was copied to the VB.Net group (as many others have been) simply to let them know you are still infesting the Classic VB group with your troll activities. > the numerous posts I've made in many > of the .NET groups. I've no doubt that you have made numerous posts there. In fact I only recently had to correct one of your answers in the VB.Net group in which you incorrectly told the OP that there was no way to have an image as the background of a VB.Net Textbox. In fact as far as I am concerned the more posts you make to the .Net groups the better. The more time you spend over there there the less time you will have to infest the Classic VB group. Anyway, it won't bother me for a while because I go away for a short holiday on Sunday night, but I'm sure there will be lots of troll rubbish from you for me have to wade through when I get back. Have a nice day. Mike [This post again copied to the VB.Net group so that they will know you are a troll]
From: Scott M. on 10 Oct 2009 17:14 "Mike Williams" <Mike(a)WhiskyAndCoke.com> wrote in message news:Ojx0MYeSKHA.504(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > "Scott M." <s-mar(a)nospam.nospam> wrote in message > news:%23%23gaSwcSKHA.4704(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > I've no doubt that you have made numerous posts there. In fact I only > recently had to correct one of your answers in the VB.Net group in which > you incorrectly told the OP that there was no way to have an image as the > background of a VB.Net Textbox. It's really great that you've corrected something that I didn't say. Keep up the good work. And, practice your reading skills. -Scott
From: Scott M. on 10 Oct 2009 17:17 "Henning" <computer_hero(a)coldmail.com> wrote in message news:uqgVDcdSKHA.3876(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Swoooshh, there all backreferences dissapeared. Is that meaning we should > start a new thread from now on? > > "Scott M." <s-mar(a)nospam.nospam> skrev i meddelandet > news:%23ZSUW9cSKHA.1792(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> What I think we're boiled down to here is that I know for a fact that a >> valuable learning tool is to provide comparisons to the concept being >> taught and you personally disagree. > > I still don't see how someone (you) educating about apples will make me an > expert on oranges? I know and that was the point of my last message. It's very clear what you belive. > >> >> Since my position is a proven learning technique and your position is >> your personal opinion, I respect it, but disagree with it. > > Educating apple specialists by teaching about oranges? Don't think that is > a proven learning technique. > > How doe's one solve when two are disagreeing? Call in some 3:rd party > opinion(s)? Perhaps, but since I'm working with proven facts and you are working with personal opionions, I don't see the need. > >> >> As such, you really haven't convinced me of anything, other than you >> don't like .NET. >> >> -Scott > And for me you only convinced me that you really should stay in the safety > of dotnet groups. At least I, have learnt nothing new about VB6 in this > thread ;) Well, since it's obvious the neither of us is going to take the other's advice. I'll just keep on doing wihat I know is right and be sure to just ignore you in the future. Good luck.
From: Henning on 10 Oct 2009 18:11 "Scott M." <s-mar(a)nospam.nospam> skrev i meddelandet news:urnmY7eSKHA.1280(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > "Henning" <computer_hero(a)coldmail.com> wrote in message > news:uqgVDcdSKHA.3876(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Swoooshh, there all backreferences dissapeared. Is that meaning we should >> start a new thread from now on? >> >> "Scott M." <s-mar(a)nospam.nospam> skrev i meddelandet >> news:%23ZSUW9cSKHA.1792(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> What I think we're boiled down to here is that I know for a fact that a >>> valuable learning tool is to provide comparisons to the concept being >>> taught and you personally disagree. >> >> I still don't see how someone (you) educating about apples will make me >> an expert on oranges? > > I know and that was the point of my last message. It's very clear what > you belive. Jeeez, you still belive that comparing VB6 to dotnet would make me a better VB6 programmer? At the best I wouldn't know what you were talking about and ignore it. At the worst I might try it only to get compiler errors. > >> >>> >>> Since my position is a proven learning technique and your position is >>> your personal opinion, I respect it, but disagree with it. >> >> Educating apple specialists by teaching about oranges? Don't think that >> is a proven learning technique. >> >> How doe's one solve when two are disagreeing? Call in some 3:rd party >> opinion(s)? > > Perhaps, but since I'm working with proven facts and you are working with > personal opionions, I don't see the need. Or is it the other way around, you might overestimating your teaching skills. > >> >>> >>> As such, you really haven't convinced me of anything, other than you >>> don't like .NET. >>> >>> -Scott >> And for me you only convinced me that you really should stay in the >> safety of dotnet groups. At least I, have learnt nothing new about VB6 in >> this thread ;) > > Well, since it's obvious the neither of us is going to take the other's > advice. I'll just keep on doing wihat I know is right and be sure to just > ignore you in the future. > > Good luck. Throwing in the towel already? /Henning
From: Henning on 10 Oct 2009 18:14
I will bet on that some 10 codelines one-liner :) Will never forget that one. /Henning "Kevin Provance" <bill(a)localhost.com> skrev i meddelandet news:Ox1P3OeSKHA.4324(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > I'm curious Rick, what do you consider to be your "best" one liner? > > - Kev > > -- > 2025 > If you do not believe in time travel, > your beliefs are about to be tempered. > > http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=43606237254 > "Rick Rothstein" <rick.newsNO.SPAM(a)NO.SPAMverizon.net> wrote in message > news:e%23QhPzdSKHA.508(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > | >> Sorry, I forgot to clean up the top (we favor top posting in the > Excel > | >> newsgroups), don't be thrown by my signature at the top of my > previous > | >> message... simply scroll down to the bottom of it to see what I > posted. > | >> > | > > | > Yeah, Excel has ruined many a good programmer. > | > > | > -ralph > | > <g> > | > | LOL > | > | But I still get to wow them every now then with a one-liner.<g> And, of > | course, worksheet formulas sort of qualify as one-liners as well (there > are > | plenty of Excel volunteers who are far more skilled at this than I am). > | > | -- > | Rick (MVP - Excel) > | > > |